Assisted Debate Builder with Large Language Models

Overview

• ADBL2 is a new assisted debate builder tool that leverages large language models to perform relation-based argument mining.
• It can be used for (1) verifying pre-established relations in a debate and (2) assisting in the creation of new arguments.
• ADBL2 is highly modular and can work with any open-source large language models as plugins.
• The authors also provide a fine-tuned Mistral-7B large language model for relation-based argument mining, which outperforms existing approaches.

Plain English Explanation

ADBL2 is a new tool that helps people build better debates. It uses powerful language models, which are computer programs that can understand and generate human-like text, to analyze arguments and assist in creating new ones.

The key features of ADBL2 are:

1. Verifying Existing Arguments: ADBL2 can check whether the connections or "relations" between the different parts of a debate are valid and make sense.
2. Generating New Arguments: ADBL2 can also help create new arguments by using the language model to suggest new ideas and perspectives.

ADBL2 is designed to be very flexible, so it can work with many different types of language models. This makes it useful for a wide range of debate topics and scenarios.

As an added bonus, the researchers also created a specialized language model called Mistral-7B that is particularly good at the task of finding connections between arguments. This model outperforms other approaches and can be used with ADBL2.

Technical Explanation

ADBL2 is built on the idea of using large language models, which are powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data, to perform relation-based argument mining. This means the system can analyze the connections and relationships between different parts of an argument, rather than just the individual components.

The tool has two main functionalities:

1. Verification of Pre-Established Relations: ADBL2 can assess whether the connections and relationships between the claims, premises, and other elements of a debate are valid and well-supported. This helps ensure the debate is logically coherent.
2. Assisted Creation of New Arguments: By leveraging the generalization capabilities of large language models, ADBL2 can suggest new arguments, counterarguments, or alternative perspectives to expand the debate.

ADBL2 is designed to be highly modular, allowing it to work with a variety of open-source large language models as plugins. This makes it adaptable to different domains and use cases.

As part of this work, the researchers also provide a new fine-tuned Mistral-7B large language model specifically optimized for relation-based argument mining. This model outperforms existing approaches, achieving an F1-score of 90.59% across multiple domains.

Critical Analysis

The ADBL2 system represents an interesting and potentially useful application of large language models for debate and argument analysis. By focusing on the relationships between argument components, rather than just the individual elements, the system can provide deeper insights and more nuanced assistance.

However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential issues with this approach. For example, it's unclear how well ADBL2 would handle complex, multi-faceted debates or arguments that rely heavily on contextual information or implicit assumptions.

Additionally, while the Mistral-7B model demonstrates strong performance on relation-based argument mining, its generalization to real-world debates and discussions may be limited. Further research is needed to assess the model's robustness and scalability.

Readers should also consider the potential biases and ethical implications of using large language models, which can sometimes reflect societal biases or make unreliable or contestable decisions, for tasks like argument analysis and generation.

Conclusion

ADBL2 is an innovative tool that leverages the power of large language models to assist in the creation and analysis of debates. By focusing on the relationships between argument components, it offers a more sophisticated approach to argument mining and assessment compared to traditional methods.

The inclusion of a specialized Mistral-7B model for relation-based argument mining is also a noteworthy contribution, demonstrating the potential for further advancements in this area.

However, as with any AI-powered system, it is important to consider the limitations and potential issues, such as the system's ability to handle complex debates and the ethical implications of using large language models for such tasks. Ongoing research and critical analysis will be essential to ensure the responsible development and deployment of tools like ADBL2.