CFBenchmark: Chinese Financial Assistant Benchmark for Large Language Model
2311.05812
0
0
💬
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated great potential in the financial domain. Thus, it becomes important to assess the performance of LLMs in the financial tasks. In this work, we introduce CFBenchmark, to evaluate the performance of LLMs for Chinese financial assistant. The basic version of CFBenchmark is designed to evaluate the basic ability in Chinese financial text processing from three aspects~(emph{i.e.} recognition, classification, and generation) including eight tasks, and includes financial texts ranging in length from 50 to over 1,800 characters. We conduct experiments on several LLMs available in the literature with CFBenchmark-Basic, and the experimental results indicate that while some LLMs show outstanding performance in specific tasks, overall, there is still significant room for improvement in basic tasks of financial text processing with existing models. In the future, we plan to explore the advanced version of CFBenchmark, aiming to further explore the extensive capabilities of language models in more profound dimensions as a financial assistant in Chinese. Our codes are released at https://github.com/TongjiFinLab/CFBenchmark.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Researchers have developed a benchmark called CFBenchmark to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese financial text processing.
- CFBenchmark assesses LLMs' abilities in three areas: recognition, classification, and generation across eight financial tasks.
- The benchmark includes texts ranging from 50 to over 1,800 characters in length.
- Experiments on several LLMs show that while some perform well on specific tasks, there is still significant room for improvement in basic financial text processing.
- Future work will explore an advanced version of CFBenchmark to further assess LLMs' capabilities as Chinese financial assistants.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. Researchers have found that these models can be useful in the financial domain, such as for tasks like analyzing financial reports or helping with customer service.
To better understand how well LLMs perform on financial tasks, the researchers created a benchmark called CFBenchmark. This benchmark evaluates LLMs in three main areas: recognition (identifying key information in text), classification (categorizing text into different types), and generation (producing new financial text).
The benchmark includes a variety of financial texts, ranging from short 50-character snippets to longer 1,800-character passages. By testing LLMs on this diverse set of tasks and texts, the researchers can get a better sense of the models' strengths and weaknesses in the financial domain.
When the researchers tested several existing LLMs using CFBenchmark, they found that while some models performed very well on specific tasks, overall there is still room for improvement in basic financial text processing. This suggests that more work is needed to develop LLMs that can truly excel as Chinese financial assistants.
Going forward, the researchers plan to create an advanced version of CFBenchmark to further explore the capabilities of LLMs in more depth, with the goal of pushing the boundaries of what these models can do in the financial world.
Technical Explanation
The researchers introduced a new benchmark called CFBenchmark to evaluate the performance of large language models (LLMs) in Chinese financial text processing. The basic version of CFBenchmark assesses LLMs across three main areas: recognition, classification, and generation.
The recognition tasks involve identifying key entities, facts, and relationships within financial texts. The classification tasks require categorizing financial texts into different types, such as earnings reports or market analyses. The generation tasks assess the ability to produce coherent, relevant financial content.
The benchmark includes a diverse set of financial texts ranging from 50 to over 1,800 characters in length. This variety ensures a comprehensive evaluation of LLM capabilities in the financial domain.
The researchers conducted experiments using CFBenchmark-Basic on several LLMs available in the literature. The results showed that while some LLMs demonstrate outstanding performance on specific tasks, there is still significant room for improvement in overall financial text processing abilities.
Going forward, the researchers plan to develop an advanced version of CFBenchmark to further explore the extensive capabilities of LLMs as Chinese financial assistants. This may involve incorporating more complex financial tasks, such as graded fine-grained analysis or numeric-sensitive language processing.
Critical Analysis
The CFBenchmark provides a valuable tool for assessing the performance of LLMs in the financial domain. By testing a range of recognition, classification, and generation tasks, the benchmark offers a comprehensive evaluation of LLM capabilities.
However, it's important to note that the benchmark's scope is limited to basic financial text processing. The researchers acknowledge that more advanced tasks, such as financial decision-making or strategic planning, are not yet addressed. Expanding the benchmark to cover these higher-level capabilities would be a valuable next step.
Additionally, the benchmark's reliance on a fixed set of financial texts may not fully capture the diversity and complexity of real-world financial data. Incorporating more dynamic, up-to-date financial information could help to better simulate the challenges faced by LLMs in practical financial applications.
Despite these limitations, the CFBenchmark represents a significant step forward in evaluating the suitability of LLMs for financial tasks. The insights gained from the experiments can inform the development of more robust and capable financial AI systems, ultimately benefiting both the finance industry and the broader public.
Conclusion
The introduction of the CFBenchmark represents an important advancement in the assessment of large language models (LLMs) for Chinese financial text processing. By evaluating LLM performance across recognition, classification, and generation tasks, the benchmark provides a comprehensive understanding of the models' capabilities in the financial domain.
The experimental results indicate that while some LLMs show outstanding performance on specific tasks, there is still significant room for improvement in basic financial text processing. This suggests that further research and development are needed to create LLMs that can truly excel as Chinese financial assistants.
The researchers' plans to expand the CFBenchmark with more advanced tasks and diverse financial data hold great promise. By pushing the boundaries of LLM capabilities in the financial domain, this work can contribute to the development of more powerful and versatile AI-driven financial tools and services.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
FinDABench: Benchmarking Financial Data Analysis Ability of Large Language Models
Shu Liu, Shangqing Zhao, Chenghao Jia, Xinlin Zhuang, Zhaoguang Long, Jie Zhou, Aimin Zhou, Man Lan, Qingquan Wu, Chong Yang
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across a wide range of tasks. However, their proficiency and reliability in the specialized domain of financial data analysis, particularly focusing on data-driven thinking, remain uncertain. To bridge this gap, we introduce texttt{FinDABench}, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the financial data analysis capabilities of LLMs within this context. texttt{FinDABench} assesses LLMs across three dimensions: 1) textbf{Foundational Ability}, evaluating the models' ability to perform financial numerical calculation and corporate sentiment risk assessment; 2) textbf{Reasoning Ability}, determining the models' ability to quickly comprehend textual information and analyze abnormal financial reports; and 3) textbf{Technical Skill}, examining the models' use of technical knowledge to address real-world data analysis challenges involving analysis generation and charts visualization from multiple perspectives. We will release texttt{FinDABench}, and the evaluation scripts at url{https://github.com/cubenlp/BIBench}. texttt{FinDABench} aims to provide a measure for in-depth analysis of LLM abilities and foster the advancement of LLMs in the field of financial data analysis.
6/17/2024
Benchmarking Large Language Models on CFLUE -- A Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation Dataset
Jie Zhu, Junhui Li, Yalong Wen, Lifan Guo
0
0
In light of recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) that have revolutionized natural language processing (NLP), there is an urgent need for new benchmarks to keep pace with the fast development of LLMs. In this paper, we propose CFLUE, the Chinese Financial Language Understanding Evaluation benchmark, designed to assess the capability of LLMs across various dimensions. Specifically, CFLUE provides datasets tailored for both knowledge assessment and application assessment. In knowledge assessment, it consists of 38K+ multiple-choice questions with associated solution explanations. These questions serve dual purposes: answer prediction and question reasoning. In application assessment, CFLUE features 16K+ test instances across distinct groups of NLP tasks such as text classification, machine translation, relation extraction, reading comprehension, and text generation. Upon CFLUE, we conduct a thorough evaluation of representative LLMs. The results reveal that only GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo achieve an accuracy exceeding 60% in answer prediction for knowledge assessment, suggesting that there is still substantial room for improvement in current LLMs. In application assessment, although GPT-4 and GPT-4-turbo are the top two performers, their considerable advantage over lightweight LLMs is noticeably diminished. The datasets and scripts associated with CFLUE are openly accessible at https://github.com/aliyun/cflue.
5/20/2024
FoundaBench: Evaluating Chinese Fundamental Knowledge Capabilities of Large Language Models
Wei Li, Ren Ma, Jiang Wu, Chenya Gu, Jiahui Peng, Jinyang Len, Songyang Zhang, Hang Yan, Dahua Lin, Conghui He
0
0
In the burgeoning field of large language models (LLMs), the assessment of fundamental knowledge remains a critical challenge, particularly for models tailored to Chinese language and culture. This paper introduces FoundaBench, a pioneering benchmark designed to rigorously evaluate the fundamental knowledge capabilities of Chinese LLMs. FoundaBench encompasses a diverse array of 3354 multiple-choice questions across common sense and K-12 educational subjects, meticulously curated to reflect the breadth and depth of everyday and academic knowledge. We present an extensive evaluation of 12 state-of-the-art LLMs using FoundaBench, employing both traditional assessment methods and our CircularEval protocol to mitigate potential biases in model responses. Our results highlight the superior performance of models pre-trained on Chinese corpora, and reveal a significant disparity between models' reasoning and memory recall capabilities. The insights gleaned from FoundaBench evaluations set a new standard for understanding the fundamental knowledge of LLMs, providing a robust framework for future advancements in the field.
4/30/2024
CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Models
Yizhi LI, Ge Zhang, Xingwei Qu, Jiali Li, Zhaoqun Li, Zekun Wang, Hao Li, Ruibin Yuan, Yinghao Ma, Kai Zhang, Wangchunshu Zhou, Yiming Liang, Lei Zhang, Lei Ma, Jiajun Zhang, Zuowen Li, Stephen W. Huang, Chenghua Lin, Jie Fu
0
0
The advancement of large language models (LLMs) has enhanced the ability to generalize across a wide range of unseen natural language processing (NLP) tasks through instruction-following. Yet, their effectiveness often diminishes in low-resource languages like Chinese, exacerbated by biased evaluations from data leakage, casting doubt on their true generalizability to new linguistic territories. In response, we introduce the Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark (CIF-Bench), designed to evaluate the zero-shot generalizability of LLMs to the Chinese language. CIF-Bench comprises 150 tasks and 15,000 input-output pairs, developed by native speakers to test complex reasoning and Chinese cultural nuances across 20 categories. To mitigate data contamination, we release only half of the dataset publicly, with the remainder kept private, and introduce diversified instructions to minimize score variance, totaling 45,000 data instances. Our evaluation of 28 selected LLMs reveals a noticeable performance gap, with the best model scoring only 52.9%, highlighting the limitations of LLMs in less familiar language and task contexts. This work not only uncovers the current limitations of LLMs in handling Chinese language tasks but also sets a new standard for future LLM generalizability research, pushing towards the development of more adaptable, culturally informed, and linguistically diverse models.
6/5/2024