Beyond Words: On Large Language Models Actionability in Mission-Critical Risk Analysis
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Risk analysis is a methodology used to assess potential risks in various scenarios, such as those related to health and information technology security.
- Risk analysis requires extensive knowledge of national and international regulations and standards, and is time and effort-intensive.
- Large language models (LLMs) can quickly summarize information and be fine-tuned for specific tasks, potentially complementing human expertise in risk analysis.
Plain English Explanation
Risk analysis is a process that helps identify and evaluate potential risks or problems that could arise in different situations. It's used in various fields, like healthcare and cybersecurity, to understand and prepare for things that might go wrong.
Conducting risk analysis requires a deep understanding of all the rules and standards that apply to a particular situation. It can be quite complex and time-consuming for humans to do this work. However, large language models (LLMs), which are advanced AI systems trained on a vast amount of data, can quickly summarize information and even be customized for specific tasks.
The researchers in this study wanted to explore whether LLMs, including models that can retrieve and incorporate relevant information (Retrieval-Augmented Generation), could be effectively used to assist with risk analysis. This could potentially save time and resources compared to relying solely on human experts.
Technical Explanation
The researchers manually curated a dataset of over 5,000 risk analysis scenarios from an industrial context, representing a wide range of mission-critical situations. They compared the performance of the base GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 LLMs to their Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) and fine-tuned (FT) counterparts on this risk analysis task.
Two human experts were used as competitors to the models, and three additional human experts were brought in to review the analyses produced by both the models and the initial human experts. The reviewers assessed factors such as accuracy, actionability, and the ability to uncover hidden risks.
The results showed that the human experts demonstrated higher overall accuracy in their risk analyses compared to the LLMs. However, the LLMs were generally quicker and more actionable in their outputs. Importantly, the researchers found that the RAG-assisted LLMs had the lowest rates of "hallucination" (generating inaccurate information), effectively uncovering hidden risks and complementing human expertise.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that their study has some limitations. The dataset, while large, may not be representative of all possible risk analysis scenarios, and the human experts involved may have biases or inconsistencies in their own assessments.
Additionally, the researchers did not explore the potential impact of fine-tuning the LLMs on specific risk analysis domains or the long-term performance of the models as they continue to be used in real-world settings. Further research in these areas would be valuable to better understand the strengths and weaknesses of LLMs in risk analysis tasks.
It's also important to consider the ethical implications of relying on LLMs for critical decision-making tasks like risk analysis. The potential for these models to generate biased or inaccurate information, and the difficulty in fully understanding their inner workings, raises concerns about their use in high-stakes scenarios.
Conclusion
This study provides evidence that large language models, particularly those with Retrieval-Augmented Generation capabilities, can be valuable tools to complement human expertise in risk analysis tasks. While human experts still demonstrate higher overall accuracy, LLMs can offer quicker, more actionable insights and are effective at uncovering hidden risks.
As the capabilities of LLMs continue to evolve, it will be important to carefully evaluate their performance and limitations in specific applications, like risk analysis and other high-stakes domains. Striking the right balance between human and machine intelligence in critical decision-making processes will be a key challenge for the future.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Beyond Words: On Large Language Models Actionability in Mission-Critical Risk Analysis
Matteo Esposito, Francesco Palagiano, Valentina Lenarduzzi, Davide Taibi
Context. Risk analysis assesses potential risks in specific scenarios. Risk analysis principles are context-less; the same methodology can be applied to a risk connected to health and information technology security. Risk analysis requires a vast knowledge of national and international regulations and standards and is time and effort-intensive. A large language model can quickly summarize information in less time than a human and can be fine-tuned to specific tasks. Aim. Our empirical study aims to investigate the effectiveness of Retrieval-Augmented Generation and fine-tuned LLM in risk analysis. To our knowledge, no prior study has explored its capabilities in risk analysis. Method. We manually curated 193 unique scenarios leading to 1283 representative samples from over 50 mission-critical analyses archived by the industrial context team in the last five years. We compared the base GPT-3.5 and GPT-4 models versus their Retrieval-Augmented Generation and fine-tuned counterparts. We employ two human experts as competitors of the models and three other human experts to review the models and the former human experts' analysis. The reviewers analyzed 5,000 scenario analyses. Results and Conclusions. Human experts demonstrated higher accuracy, but LLMs are quicker and more actionable. Moreover, our findings show that RAG-assisted LLMs have the lowest hallucination rates, effectively uncovering hidden risks and complementing human expertise. Thus, the choice of model depends on specific needs, with FTMs for accuracy, RAG for hidden risks discovery, and base models for comprehensiveness and actionability. Therefore, experts can leverage LLMs as an effective complementing companion in risk analysis within a condensed timeframe. They can also save costs by averting unnecessary expenses associated with implementing unwarranted countermeasures.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Advancing TTP Analysis: Harnessing the Power of Large Language Models with Retrieval Augmented Generation
Reza Fayyazi, Rozhina Taghdimi, Shanchieh Jay Yang
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs) outline the methods attackers use to exploit vulnerabilities. The interpretation of TTPs in the MITRE ATT&CK framework can be challenging for cybersecurity practitioners due to presumed expertise and complex dependencies. Meanwhile, advancements with Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to recent surge in studies exploring its uses in cybersecurity operations. It is, however, unclear how LLMs can be used in an efficient and proper way to provide accurate responses for critical domains such as cybersecurity. This leads us to investigate how to better use two types of LLMs: small-scale encoder-only (e.g., RoBERTa) and larger decoder-only (e.g., GPT-3.5) LLMs to comprehend and summarize TTPs with the intended purposes (i.e., tactics) of a cyberattack procedure. This work studies and compares the uses of supervised fine-tuning (SFT) of encoder-only LLMs vs. Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) for decoder-only LLMs (without fine-tuning). Both SFT and RAG techniques presumably enhance the LLMs with relevant contexts for each cyberattack procedure. Our studies show decoder-only LLMs with RAG achieves better performance than encoder-only models with SFT, particularly when directly relevant context is extracted by RAG. The decoder-only results could suffer low `Precision' while achieving high `Recall'. Our findings further highlight a counter-intuitive observation that more generic prompts tend to yield better predictions of cyberattack tactics than those that are more specifically tailored.
Read more7/23/2024
💬
0
A Survey on RAG Meets LLMs: Towards Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models
Wenqi Fan, Yujuan Ding, Liangbo Ning, Shijie Wang, Hengyun Li, Dawei Yin, Tat-Seng Chua, Qing Li
As one of the most advanced techniques in AI, Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) can offer reliable and up-to-date external knowledge, providing huge convenience for numerous tasks. Particularly in the era of AI-Generated Content (AIGC), the powerful capacity of retrieval in providing additional knowledge enables RAG to assist existing generative AI in producing high-quality outputs. Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated revolutionary abilities in language understanding and generation, while still facing inherent limitations, such as hallucinations and out-of-date internal knowledge. Given the powerful abilities of RAG in providing the latest and helpful auxiliary information, Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models (RA-LLMs) have emerged to harness external and authoritative knowledge bases, rather than solely relying on the model's internal knowledge, to augment the generation quality of LLMs. In this survey, we comprehensively review existing research studies in RA-LLMs, covering three primary technical perspectives: architectures, training strategies, and applications. As the preliminary knowledge, we briefly introduce the foundations and recent advances of LLMs. Then, to illustrate the practical significance of RAG for LLMs, we systematically review mainstream relevant work by their architectures, training strategies, and application areas, detailing specifically the challenges of each and the corresponding capabilities of RA-LLMs. Finally, to deliver deeper insights, we discuss current limitations and several promising directions for future research. Updated information about this survey can be found at https://advanced-recommender-systems.github.io/RAG-Meets-LLMs/
Read more6/18/2024
💬
0
From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management
Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu
This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.
Read more8/13/2024