Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper provides a comprehensive survey of the challenges and opportunities in addressing bias and unfairness in information retrieval (IR) systems, with a particular focus on large language models (LLMs).
- It examines the various sources of bias that can arise in IR systems, including algorithmic, data, and model biases, and how these biases can lead to unfair outcomes.
- The paper also explores potential solutions and mitigation strategies, as well as the ethical considerations and broader societal implications of bias and unfairness in IR systems powered by LLMs.
Plain English Explanation
Information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines, are designed to help people find the information they need. However, these systems can sometimes be biased or unfair, leading to results that may not be accurate or representative. This paper looks at the different ways bias and unfairness can creep into IR systems, especially when they use large language models (LLMs) as a key component.
LLMs are a type of artificial intelligence that can understand and generate human-like language. While LLMs have made impressive advancements in IR, they can also bring their own biases and unfairness into the mix. For example, the data used to train an LLM may reflect societal biases, or the model itself may learn to perpetuate harmful stereotypes.
The paper explores these challenges in depth, and also looks at potential solutions and strategies for mitigating bias and unfairness in IR systems powered by LLMs. This includes techniques for adjusting the training data, modifying the model architecture, and incorporating fairness considerations into the design and deployment of these systems.
Ultimately, the goal is to create IR systems that are more equitable and inclusive, and that can serve the needs of all users, regardless of their background or identity. This is an important challenge that requires careful thought and ongoing research.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by defining the key concepts of bias and unfairness in the context of information retrieval. It outlines the various sources of bias that can arise, including algorithmic bias (e.g., the way the IR system is designed), data bias (e.g., the data used to train the system), and model bias (e.g., biases inherent in the language model).
The paper then delves into the specific challenges posed by large language models (LLMs) in IR systems. LLMs have become increasingly prevalent in IR, as they can provide more accurate and natural-sounding query responses. However, the authors argue that LLMs can also amplify and perpetuate biases, leading to unfair and potentially harmful outcomes.
To address these challenges, the paper explores various mitigation strategies, such as debiasing training data, developing more inclusive model architectures, and incorporating fairness constraints into the IR system design. The authors also discuss the ethical considerations and broader societal implications of bias and unfairness in LLM-powered IR systems.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive and well-researched overview of the challenges and opportunities in addressing bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems powered by large language models. The authors acknowledge the inherent complexities and trade-offs involved in this issue, and they highlight the need for ongoing research and collaboration between researchers, practitioners, and policymakers.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it does not delve deeply into specific case studies or empirical evaluations of the proposed mitigation strategies. While the authors provide a thorough theoretical framework, more concrete examples and empirical evidence would help strengthen the practical applicability of the insights.
Additionally, the paper raises the important question of whether it is truly possible to achieve "fair" LLMs, given the fundamental challenges posed by the scale and complexity of these models. This is an area that warrants further exploration and discussion.
Overall, this paper serves as a valuable resource for anyone interested in understanding the nuanced challenges of bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems, and the potential role of large language models in both perpetuating and mitigating these issues.
Conclusion
This comprehensive survey paper highlights the critical challenges and opportunities in addressing bias and unfairness in information retrieval systems powered by large language models. By examining the various sources of bias, exploring potential mitigation strategies, and considering the broader ethical and societal implications, the authors provide a valuable framework for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers to tackle this important issue.
As LLMs continue to play an increasingly central role in IR systems, it is essential that we work towards developing more equitable and inclusive solutions that serve the needs of all users. This paper lays the groundwork for further research and collaboration in this vital area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era
Sunhao Dai, Chen Xu, Shicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Zhenhua Dong, Jun Xu
With the rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs), information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines and recommender systems, have undergone a significant paradigm shift. This evolution, while heralding new opportunities, introduces emerging challenges, particularly in terms of biases and unfairness, which may threaten the information ecosystem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of existing works on emerging and pressing bias and unfairness issues in IR systems when the integration of LLMs. We first unify bias and unfairness issues as distribution mismatch problems, providing a groundwork for categorizing various mitigation strategies through distribution alignment. Subsequently, we systematically delve into the specific bias and unfairness issues arising from three critical stages of LLMs integration into IR systems: data collection, model development, and result evaluation. In doing so, we meticulously review and analyze recent literature, focusing on the definitions, characteristics, and corresponding mitigation strategies associated with these issues. Finally, we identify and highlight some open problems and challenges for future work, aiming to inspire researchers and stakeholders in the IR field and beyond to better understand and mitigate bias and unfairness issues of IR in this LLM era. We also consistently maintain a GitHub repository for the relevant papers and resources in this rising direction at https://github.com/KID-22/LLM-IR-Bias-Fairness-Survey.
Read more8/22/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024
💬
0
Fairness in Large Language Models in Three Hour
Thang Doan Viet, Zichong Wang, Minh Nhat Nguyen, Wenbin Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains but often lack fairness considerations, potentially leading to discriminatory outcomes against marginalized populations. Unlike fairness in traditional machine learning, fairness in LLMs involves unique backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. This tutorial provides a systematic overview of recent advances in the literature concerning fair LLMs, beginning with real-world case studies to introduce LLMs, followed by an analysis of bias causes therein. The concept of fairness in LLMs is then explored, summarizing the strategies for evaluating bias and the algorithms designed to promote fairness. Additionally, resources for assessing bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are compiled, and current research challenges and open questions in the field are discussed. The repository is available at url{https://github.com/LavinWong/Fairness-in-Large-Language-Models}.
Read more8/6/2024
💬
0
Fairness in Large Language Models: A Taxonomic Survey
Zhibo Chu, Zichong Wang, Wenbin Zhang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable success across various domains. However, despite their promising performance in numerous real-world applications, most of these algorithms lack fairness considerations. Consequently, they may lead to discriminatory outcomes against certain communities, particularly marginalized populations, prompting extensive study in fair LLMs. On the other hand, fairness in LLMs, in contrast to fairness in traditional machine learning, entails exclusive backgrounds, taxonomies, and fulfillment techniques. To this end, this survey presents a comprehensive overview of recent advances in the existing literature concerning fair LLMs. Specifically, a brief introduction to LLMs is provided, followed by an analysis of factors contributing to bias in LLMs. Additionally, the concept of fairness in LLMs is discussed categorically, summarizing metrics for evaluating bias in LLMs and existing algorithms for promoting fairness. Furthermore, resources for evaluating bias in LLMs, including toolkits and datasets, are summarized. Finally, existing research challenges and open questions are discussed.
Read more4/3/2024