Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training

Read original: arXiv:2311.04155 - Published 6/24/2024 by Jiale Cheng, Xiao Liu, Kehan Zheng, Pei Ke, Hongning Wang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Minlie Huang
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive success, but they often don't align well with human intents, leading to the "alignment problem"
  • Existing methods to improve alignment focus on further training LLMs, which can be expensive and inaccessible for some models
  • This paper proposes a different approach called "Black-Box Prompt Optimization (BPO)" to optimize user prompts instead of updating LLM parameters

Plain English Explanation

Large language models are powerful AI systems that can perform a wide variety of tasks, like generating text, answering questions, and even coding. These models have achieved impressive results, but they don't always behave the way humans want them to. This mismatch between the model's output and the user's intent is known as the "alignment problem."

To address this issue, researchers have tried further training the language models to better understand and follow human instructions. However, this additional training can be very expensive, requiring a lot of computing power. Even worse, some powerful language models like GPT are not accessible for user-demanded training.

In this paper, the researchers take a different approach. Instead of modifying the language model itself, they focus on optimizing the prompts (the instructions given to the model) to better suit the model's understanding. This technique, called "Black-Box Prompt Optimization" (BPO), leverages human feedback to find the best prompts for a given language model, without needing to update the model's parameters.

The key advantage of BPO is that it's "model-agnostic," meaning it can work with any language model, even ones that aren't accessible for further training. The researchers found that using BPO-optimized prompts with ChatGPT and GPT-4 led to a 22% and 10% increase in "win rate" (a measure of how well the model's outputs match the user's intent) compared to the original models.

Importantly, the BPO-aligned language models outperformed the same models aligned using other methods, like "Preference-based Prompt Optimization" (PPO) and "Defensive Prompt Optimization" (DPO). The researchers also showed that combining BPO with PPO or DPO can bring even more performance gains.

Technical Explanation

The core idea of "Black-Box Prompt Optimization" (BPO) is to optimize the user prompts given to large language models, rather than updating the model parameters themselves.

The researchers first collect human preferences on the quality of the language model's outputs for different prompts. They then use an optimization algorithm to find the best prompt that maximizes the alignment between the model's outputs and the user's preferences.

This approach has several advantages:

  1. Model-agnostic: BPO can work with any language model, even those that are not accessible for further training, like GPT.
  2. Cost-effective: Updating prompts is generally cheaper than retraining the entire language model.
  3. Superior to LLM: The researchers found that BPO-aligned language models can outperform the same models aligned using other methods, like "Preference-based Prompt Optimization" (PPO) and "Defensive Prompt Optimization" (DPO).
  4. Complementary: Combining BPO with PPO or DPO can bring additional performance gains.

The empirical results in the paper demonstrate that using BPO-optimized prompts with ChatGPT and GPT-4 led to a 22% and 10% increase in "win rate" (a measure of how well the model's outputs match the user's intent) compared to the original models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach to addressing the "alignment problem" in large language models without the need for expensive retraining. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Generalization: The paper focuses on optimizing prompts for specific language models (ChatGPT and GPT-4). It's unclear how well the BPO approach would generalize to other models or to more diverse user intents.
  2. Human Feedback: The success of BPO relies on the quality and consistency of the human feedback used to optimize the prompts. Ensuring reliable and unbiased human evaluations may be challenging in practice.
  3. Computational Overhead: While BPO is generally less computationally intensive than retraining the entire language model, the iterative optimization process may still require significant computing resources, especially for large or complex prompts.
  4. Interpretability: The paper does not provide much insight into the specific changes made to the prompts by the BPO algorithm or how these changes lead to improved alignment. Greater transparency could help users better understand and trust the optimization process.

Despite these potential limitations, the BPO approach represents an important step towards improving the usability and alignment of large language models without the need for extensive retraining. Further research into the generalization, robustness, and interpretability of this technique could lead to valuable advancements in the field.

Conclusion

This paper proposes a novel approach called "Black-Box Prompt Optimization" (BPO) to improve the alignment between large language models and human intents. By optimizing the prompts given to the models, rather than updating their parameters, BPO offers a more cost-effective and accessible solution to the "alignment problem."

The empirical results demonstrate that BPO-aligned versions of ChatGPT and GPT-4 can outperform the original models, as well as those aligned using other methods like "Preference-based Prompt Optimization" (PPO) and "Defensive Prompt Optimization" (DPO). Additionally, combining BPO with these other techniques can yield even greater performance gains.

While the BPO approach shows promise, further research is needed to address potential limitations, such as ensuring reliable human feedback, improving generalization to diverse user intents, and enhancing the interpretability of the optimization process. Nonetheless, this work represents an important step towards making large language models more aligned with human needs and preferences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Black-Box Prompt Optimization: Aligning Large Language Models without Model Training

Jiale Cheng, Xiao Liu, Kehan Zheng, Pei Ke, Hongning Wang, Yuxiao Dong, Jie Tang, Minlie Huang

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive success in various applications. However, these models are often not well aligned with human intents, which calls for additional treatments on them; that is, the alignment problem. To make LLMs better follow user instructions, existing alignment methods primarily focus on further training them. However, the extra training of LLMs is usually expensive in terms of GPU computing; even worse, some LLMs are not accessible for user-demanded training, such as GPTs. In this work, we take a different perspective -- Black-Box Prompt Optimization (BPO) -- to perform alignments. The idea is to optimize user prompts to suit LLMs' input understanding, so as to best realize users' intents without updating LLMs' parameters. BPO leverages human preferences to optimize prompts, thus making it superior to LLM (e.g., ChatGPT) as a prompt engineer. Moreover, BPO is model-agnostic, and the empirical results demonstrate that the BPO-aligned ChatGPT yields a 22% increase in the win rate against its original version and 10% for GPT-4. Notably, the BPO-aligned LLMs can outperform the same models aligned by PPO and DPO, and it also brings additional performance gains when combining BPO with PPO or DPO. Code and datasets are released at https://github.com/thu-coai/BPO.

Read more

6/24/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Language Models as Black-Box Optimizers for Vision-Language Models

Shihong Liu, Zhiqiu Lin, Samuel Yu, Ryan Lee, Tiffany Ling, Deepak Pathak, Deva Ramanan

Vision-language models (VLMs) pre-trained on web-scale datasets have demonstrated remarkable capabilities on downstream tasks when fine-tuned with minimal data. However, many VLMs rely on proprietary data and are not open-source, which restricts the use of white-box approaches for fine-tuning. As such, we aim to develop a black-box approach to optimize VLMs through natural language prompts, thereby avoiding the need to access model parameters, feature embeddings, or even output logits. We propose employing chat-based LLMs to search for the best text prompt for VLMs. Specifically, we adopt an automatic hill-climbing procedure that converges to an effective prompt by evaluating the performance of current prompts and asking LLMs to refine them based on textual feedback, all within a conversational process without human-in-the-loop. In a challenging 1-shot image classification setup, our simple approach surpasses the white-box continuous prompting method (CoOp) by an average of 1.5% across 11 datasets including ImageNet. Our approach also outperforms both human-engineered and LLM-generated prompts. We highlight the advantage of conversational feedback that incorporates both positive and negative prompts, suggesting that LLMs can utilize the implicit gradient direction in textual feedback for a more efficient search. In addition, we find that the text prompts generated through our strategy are not only more interpretable but also transfer well across different VLM architectures in a black-box manner. Lastly, we apply our framework to optimize the state-of-the-art black-box VLM (DALL-E 3) for text-to-image generation, prompt inversion, and personalization.

Read more

5/15/2024

MAPO: Boosting Large Language Model Performance with Model-Adaptive Prompt Optimization
Total Score

0

MAPO: Boosting Large Language Model Performance with Model-Adaptive Prompt Optimization

Yuyan Chen, Zhihao Wen, Ge Fan, Zhengyu Chen, Wei Wu, Dayiheng Liu, Zhixu Li, Bang Liu, Yanghua Xiao

Prompt engineering, as an efficient and effective way to leverage Large Language Models (LLM), has drawn a lot of attention from the research community. The existing research primarily emphasizes the importance of adapting prompts to specific tasks, rather than specific LLMs. However, a good prompt is not solely defined by its wording, but also binds to the nature of the LLM in question. In this work, we first quantitatively demonstrate that different prompts should be adapted to different LLMs to enhance their capabilities across various downstream tasks in NLP. Then we novelly propose a model-adaptive prompt optimizer (MAPO) method that optimizes the original prompts for each specific LLM in downstream tasks. Extensive experiments indicate that the proposed method can effectively refine prompts for an LLM, leading to significant improvements over various downstream tasks.

Read more

7/8/2024

FIPO: Free-form Instruction-oriented Prompt Optimization with Preference Dataset and Modular Fine-tuning Schema
Total Score

0

FIPO: Free-form Instruction-oriented Prompt Optimization with Preference Dataset and Modular Fine-tuning Schema

Junru Lu, Siyu An, Min Zhang, Yulan He, Di Yin, Xing Sun

When the quality of naive prompts is carefully optimized by human experts, the task performance of large language models (LLMs) can be significantly improved. However, expert-based prompt optimizations are expensive. Herein, some works have proposed Automatic Prompt Optimization (APO), to optimize naive prompts according to task outputs of given in-box testing models, with the help of advanced LLMs (e.g., GPT-4) in an ad-hoc way. Although effective, existing schemes suffer from poor generalization ability and privacy risk. To this end, we collect the first large-scale Prompt Optimization Preference dataset (POP), fine-tune offline local LLM-based optimizers, then fairly test with various downstream models. Our method allows accurate optimization of the core task instruction part within the naive prompt in a model-agnostic manner, and thus is named Free-from Instruction-oriented Prompt Optimization (FIPO). In specific, FIPO uses a modular APO template that dynamically integrate the naive task instruction, optional instruction responses, and optional ground truth to produce finely optimized prompts. The POP dataset is meticulously constructed using advanced LLMs, undergoing rigorous cross-validation by human experts and analytical models. Leveraging insights from the data with Tulu2 models and diverse fine-tuning strategies, we validate the efficacy of FIPO framework across five public benchmarks and six testing models. Check codes and data here: https://github.com/LuJunru/FIPO_Project.

Read more

8/15/2024