Robust Prompt Optimization for Defending Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks

Overview

• Advances in AI alignment have not fully addressed the vulnerability of large language models (LLMs) to adversarial attacks or "jailbreaking" - where prompts are modified to induce unwanted behavior.
• While some defenses have been proposed, they have not kept up with the evolving threat landscape.
• The paper introduces an optimization-based approach called Robust Prompt Optimization (RPO) to create system-level defenses against jailbreaking attacks on LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and Llama-2 are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, these models remain vulnerable to adversarial attacks or "jailbreaking" - where adversaries craft prompts that can make the model behave in unintended ways, such as generating harmful content.

While researchers have proposed some defenses against these attacks, the authors argue that these defenses have not kept pace with the evolving threat landscape. To address this, the researchers developed an approach called Robust Prompt Optimization (RPO) that aims to make LLMs more resistant to jailbreaking attacks.

The key idea behind RPO is to directly incorporate the adversary's objective into the defensive objective. This allows the defense to adapt to the worst-case attacks, rather than just the specific attacks seen during training. The authors show that this approach can significantly reduce the success rate of jailbreaking attacks on LLMs like GPT-4 and Llama-2.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes an optimization-based objective for defending LLMs against jailbreaking attacks and an algorithm, Robust Prompt Optimization (RPO), to implement this defense.

The core of the RPO approach is to directly incorporate the adversary's objective into the defensive objective. This means the defense is optimized to work against the worst-case adaptive attacks, rather than just the specific attacks seen during training.

Specifically, the authors formulate the defense as a minimax optimization problem, where the defender tries to find the optimal "robust suffix" (a lightweight and transferable prompt) to append to the input, while the adversary tries to find the prompt that maximizes the likelihood of the unwanted behavior. By solving this minimax problem, the RPO algorithm can create a defense that is resilient to a broad range of jailbreaking attacks.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of RPO through theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on GPT-4 and Llama-2 using the JailbreakBench benchmark. They show that RPO can significantly reduce the attack success rate compared to prior defenses, reaching 6% on GPT-4 and 0% on Llama-2, setting a new state-of-the-art.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach to defending LLMs against jailbreaking attacks, but it also acknowledges several caveats and limitations:

• The defense is focused on system-level robustness and may not address all potential vulnerabilities, such as those arising from the model's multimodal nature.
• The authors note that the defense may not be as effective against extremely powerful adversaries or in scenarios with very limited computational resources.
• The paper does not explore the broader societal implications of these types of defenses, such as the potential for misuse or the impact on model transparency and interpretability.

Furthermore, while the results are impressive, it would be valuable to see the defense evaluated on a wider range of LLMs and attack scenarios to better understand its generalizability and limitations.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel optimization-based approach called Robust Prompt Optimization (RPO) that aims to make large language models more resistant to jailbreaking attacks. By directly incorporating the adversary's objective into the defensive objective, RPO can adapt to a broad range of adaptive attacks, outperforming previous defenses.

The authors' experimental results on GPT-4 and Llama-2 demonstrate the potential of this approach, but also highlight the need for continued research to address the evolving threat landscape and the broader societal implications of these types of defenses. As the capabilities of LLMs continue to grow, developing robust and responsible defensive strategies will be crucial to ensuring the safe and beneficial deployment of these powerful AI systems.