Bridging Lottery ticket and Grokking: Is Weight Norm Sufficient to Explain Delayed Generalization?

Overview

• The paper explores the "grokking" phenomenon in neural networks, where a network first reaches a memorization solution with perfect training accuracy but poor generalization, and then later reaches a perfectly generalized solution with further training.
• The researchers aim to analyze the mechanism of grokking, identifying the process of finding "lottery tickets" (good sparse subnetworks) as the key to describing the transitional phase between memorization and generalization.
• They refer to these subnetworks as "Grokking tickets" and show that they can drastically accelerate grokking compared to dense networks on various configurations.

Plain English Explanation

Neural networks are a type of machine learning model that can learn to perform complex tasks by analyzing large amounts of data. One of the surprising behaviors of neural networks is something called "grokking," where the network first learns to perfectly memorize the training data, but then later on, it actually learns to generalize and perform well on new, unseen data.

The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how this grokking process works. They hypothesized that the key is finding "good" sparse subnetworks within the larger neural network, which they call "Grokking tickets." These subnetworks are identified through a technique called magnitude pruning, where the least important connections in the network are removed.

The researchers found that by using these Grokking tickets, they could drastically speed up the grokking process compared to using the full, dense neural network. This suggests that the weight norms (the magnitudes of the connection strengths) are not enough to explain grokking on their own, and that finding the right sparse subnetworks is a critical factor in the transition from memorization to generalization.

Technical Explanation

The paper analyzes the mechanism behind the grokking phenomenon, where neural networks first reach a memorization solution with perfect training accuracy but poor generalization, and then later reach a perfectly generalized solution with further training.

The researchers hypothesize that the process of finding "lottery tickets" (good sparse subnetworks) is the key to describing the transitional phase between memorization and generalization. They refer to these subnetworks as "Grokking tickets," which are identified via magnitude pruning after the network has reached perfect generalization.

Using these Grokking tickets, the researchers show that the lottery tickets can drastically accelerate grokking compared to dense networks on various configurations, including multilayer perceptrons (MLPs), Transformers, arithmetic tasks, and image classification tasks. To verify that the Grokking tickets are more critical than just weight norms, they compare the performance of the good subnetworks to a dense network with the same L1 and L2 norms. The results demonstrate that the subnetworks generalize faster than the controlled dense model.

Further investigations reveal that grokking can be achieved even without weight decay, as long as the pruning rate is appropriate. However, the researchers found that the speedup does not occur when using tickets identified at the memorization solution, the transition between memorization and generalization, or when pruning networks at initialization (using techniques like Random pruning, Grasp, SNIP, and Synflow).

The results suggest that the weight norm of network parameters is not enough to explain the process of grokking, and that the importance of finding good subnetworks is crucial in describing the transition from memorization to generalization.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of the grokking phenomenon in neural networks. By introducing the concept of "Grokking tickets" and demonstrating their importance in the transition from memorization to generalization, the researchers offer a promising approach to accelerating the grokking process.

However, the study does not fully address the underlying mechanisms that lead to the emergence of these Grokking tickets. While the researchers show that the weight norms alone are not sufficient to explain grokking, further investigation is needed to uncover the deeper factors that govern the formation and significance of these subnetworks.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a limited set of tasks and architectures, such as MLPs, Transformers, and simple arithmetic and image classification problems. It would be valuable to explore the generalization of these findings to a wider range of neural network models and real-world applications, which may uncover additional insights or limitations of the Grokking tickets approach.

Finally, the paper does not provide a clear explanation of the biological or cognitive implications of the grokking phenomenon. While the technical insights are valuable for the machine learning community, understanding the potential connections to human learning and cognition could broaden the impact and relevance of this research.

Conclusion

The grokking as transition from lazy to rich paper offers an important contribution to the understanding of generalization in neural networks. By identifying the "Grokking tickets" as a key factor in the transition from memorization to perfect generalization, the researchers provide a promising approach to accelerating this process.

The findings challenge the notion that weight norms alone can explain grokking, and instead highlight the importance of finding the right sparse subnetworks within the larger neural network. This suggests that the dichotomy between early and late phase implicit biases may play a crucial role in the grokking phenomenon, as the network transitions from a "lazy" memorization solution to a "rich" generalized one.

Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms underlying the emergence of these Grokking tickets, and to explore their broader applicability across different neural network architectures and real-world tasks. Ultimately, this work contributes to the ongoing demystification of lazy training in neural networks and the study of efficient training of Transformer models, offering valuable insights for the continued advancement of machine learning and artificial intelligence.