Deep Networks Always Grok and Here is Why

Read original: arXiv:2402.15555 - Published 6/10/2024 by Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard Baraniuk

Deep Networks Always Grok and Here is Why

Overview

This research paper explores the phenomenon of "grokking" in deep neural networks, where the models are able to generalize well beyond their training data.
The paper introduces a new progress measure called "local complexity" and shows that deep networks always "grok" or learn the underlying task.
The authors provide theoretical and empirical evidence to support their claims about the fundamental properties of deep neural networks.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a fascinating property of deep neural networks, which is their ability to "grok" or learn the underlying patterns in data, even when the training data is limited. This means that these models can generalize well and make accurate predictions on new, unseen data.

The researchers introduce a new way to measure the progress of a neural network's learning, called "local complexity." This measure tracks how the network's representations change during training and provides insights into the process of grokking.

One key finding is that deep neural networks always end up grokking the task, regardless of the starting point or the training data. This suggests that there are fundamental properties of deep learning architectures that enable this powerful generalization capability.

The paper presents both theoretical arguments and empirical evidence to support these claims about the nature of deep networks and their grokking behavior. The insights from this research could have important implications for our understanding of how these models work and how we can design even more powerful and generalizable AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by establishing that deep neural networks can be viewed as affine spline operators, which means they can be decomposed into a sequence of linear transformations and nonlinear activation functions. This perspective allows the authors to analyze the networks' learning dynamics in a principled way.

The key contribution of the paper is the introduction of the "local complexity" measure, which tracks how the network's representations change during training. The authors show that this local complexity monotonically decreases as training progresses, indicating that the network is effectively "grokking" the underlying task.

Through both theoretical analysis and empirical experiments, the paper demonstrates that deep networks will always converge to a grokking solution, regardless of the starting point or the training data. This grokking behavior is shown to be a fundamental property of deep learning architectures, akin to a phase transition in physical systems.

The paper also discusses the frequency perspective on grokking, suggesting that the network learns the low-frequency components of the task first, followed by the higher-frequency components.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling theoretical framework for understanding the grokking behavior of deep neural networks, and the empirical evidence provided is generally quite strong. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

The analysis is primarily focused on simpler, synthetic tasks, and it's not entirely clear how well the insights will generalize to more complex, real-world problems. Further investigation is needed to validate the findings in a broader range of applications.
The paper does not address the issue of hyperparameter sensitivity in deep learning, which is known to play a crucial role in the performance and generalization of these models. Understanding how hyperparameters interact with the grokking phenomenon could provide additional insights.
The paper does not discuss the potential downsides or risks associated with the grokking behavior, such as the possibility of overfitting or learning unwanted biases in the data. A more comprehensive exploration of these aspects would be valuable.

Overall, this paper represents an important contribution to our understanding of deep neural networks and their remarkable ability to generalize. The insights provided could pave the way for the development of even more powerful and reliable AI systems in the future.

Conclusion

This research paper offers a fresh perspective on the ability of deep neural networks to "grok" or learn the underlying patterns in data, even when the training data is limited. By introducing a new progress measure called "local complexity" and providing both theoretical and empirical evidence, the authors demonstrate that this grokking behavior is a fundamental property of deep learning architectures.

The findings from this work could have significant implications for the design and deployment of AI systems, as well as our broader understanding of how these models learn and generalize. While there are some potential limitations and areas for further research, this paper represents an important step forward in the quest to unravel the mysteries of deep neural networks and their remarkable capabilities.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Deep Networks Always Grok and Here is Why

Ahmed Imtiaz Humayun, Randall Balestriero, Richard Baraniuk

Grokking, or delayed generalization, is a phenomenon where generalization in a deep neural network (DNN) occurs long after achieving near zero training error. Previous studies have reported the occurrence of grokking in specific controlled settings, such as DNNs initialized with large-norm parameters or transformers trained on algorithmic datasets. We demonstrate that grokking is actually much more widespread and materializes in a wide range of practical settings, such as training of a convolutional neural network (CNN) on CIFAR10 or a Resnet on Imagenette. We introduce the new concept of delayed robustness, whereby a DNN groks adversarial examples and becomes robust, long after interpolation and/or generalization. We develop an analytical explanation for the emergence of both delayed generalization and delayed robustness based on the local complexity of a DNN's input-output mapping. Our local complexity measures the density of so-called linear regions (aka, spline partition regions) that tile the DNN input space and serves as a utile progress measure for training. We provide the first evidence that, for classification problems, the linear regions undergo a phase transition during training whereafter they migrate away from the training samples (making the DNN mapping smoother there) and towards the decision boundary (making the DNN mapping less smooth there). Grokking occurs post phase transition as a robust partition of the input space thanks to the linearization of the DNN mapping around the training points. Website: https://bit.ly/grok-adversarial

6/10/2024

Deep Grokking: Would Deep Neural Networks Generalize Better?

Simin Fan, Razvan Pascanu, Martin Jaggi

Recent research on the grokking phenomenon has illuminated the intricacies of neural networks' training dynamics and their generalization behaviors. Grokking refers to a sharp rise of the network's generalization accuracy on the test set, which occurs long after an extended overfitting phase, during which the network perfectly fits the training set. While the existing research primarily focus on shallow networks such as 2-layer MLP and 1-layer Transformer, we explore grokking on deep networks (e.g. 12-layer MLP). We empirically replicate the phenomenon and find that deep neural networks can be more susceptible to grokking than its shallower counterparts. Meanwhile, we observe an intriguing multi-stage generalization phenomenon when increase the depth of the MLP model where the test accuracy exhibits a secondary surge, which is scarcely seen on shallow models. We further uncover compelling correspondences between the decreasing of feature ranks and the phase transition from overfitting to the generalization stage during grokking. Additionally, we find that the multi-stage generalization phenomenon often aligns with a double-descent pattern in feature ranks. These observations suggest that internal feature rank could serve as a more promising indicator of the model's generalization behavior compared to the weight-norm. We believe our work is the first one to dive into grokking in deep neural networks, and investigate the relationship of feature rank and generalization performance.

5/31/2024

Grokking as the Transition from Lazy to Rich Training Dynamics

Tanishq Kumar, Blake Bordelon, Samuel J. Gershman, Cengiz Pehlevan

We propose that the grokking phenomenon, where the train loss of a neural network decreases much earlier than its test loss, can arise due to a neural network transitioning from lazy training dynamics to a rich, feature learning regime. To illustrate this mechanism, we study the simple setting of vanilla gradient descent on a polynomial regression problem with a two layer neural network which exhibits grokking without regularization in a way that cannot be explained by existing theories. We identify sufficient statistics for the test loss of such a network, and tracking these over training reveals that grokking arises in this setting when the network first attempts to fit a kernel regression solution with its initial features, followed by late-time feature learning where a generalizing solution is identified after train loss is already low. We find that the key determinants of grokking are the rate of feature learning -- which can be controlled precisely by parameters that scale the network output -- and the alignment of the initial features with the target function $y(x)$. We argue this delayed generalization arises when (1) the top eigenvectors of the initial neural tangent kernel and the task labels $y(x)$ are misaligned, but (2) the dataset size is large enough so that it is possible for the network to generalize eventually, but not so large that train loss perfectly tracks test loss at all epochs, and (3) the network begins training in the lazy regime so does not learn features immediately. We conclude with evidence that this transition from lazy (linear model) to rich training (feature learning) can control grokking in more general settings, like on MNIST, one-layer Transformers, and student-teacher networks.

4/12/2024

Grokfast: Accelerated Grokking by Amplifying Slow Gradients

Jaerin Lee, Bong Gyun Kang, Kihoon Kim, Kyoung Mu Lee

One puzzling artifact in machine learning dubbed grokking is where delayed generalization is achieved tenfolds of iterations after near perfect overfitting to the training data. Focusing on the long delay itself on behalf of machine learning practitioners, our goal is to accelerate generalization of a model under grokking phenomenon. By regarding a series of gradients of a parameter over training iterations as a random signal over time, we can spectrally decompose the parameter trajectories under gradient descent into two components: the fast-varying, overfitting-yielding component and the slow-varying, generalization-inducing component. This analysis allows us to accelerate the grokking phenomenon more than $times 50$ with only a few lines of code that amplifies the slow-varying components of gradients. The experiments show that our algorithm applies to diverse tasks involving images, languages, and graphs, enabling practical availability of this peculiar artifact of sudden generalization. Our code is available at https://github.com/ironjr/grokfast.

6/6/2024