Can LLMs Augment Low-Resource Reading Comprehension Datasets? Opportunities and Challenges

Read original: arXiv:2309.12426 - Published 7/11/2024 by Vinay Samuel, Houda Aynaou, Arijit Ghosh Chowdhury, Karthik Venkat Ramanan, Aman Chadha
Total Score

0

Can LLMs Augment Low-Resource Reading Comprehension Datasets? Opportunities and Challenges

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the opportunities and challenges of using large language models (LLMs) to augment low-resource reading comprehension datasets.
  • The researchers investigate whether LLMs can be effectively used as annotators to generate high-quality reading comprehension questions and answers.
  • The study compares the performance of LLMs to human-generated datasets and explores the potential benefits and limitations of this approach.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. The researchers in this paper wanted to see if LLMs could be used to create reading comprehension datasets - that is, collections of passages with questions and answers that can be used to test how well a person or machine can understand the content.

Reading comprehension datasets are important for training and evaluating natural language processing systems, but they can be expensive and time-consuming to create, especially for languages or domains that don't have a lot of existing data. The researchers explored whether LLMs could be used as a more efficient way to generate these datasets, potentially allowing for the creation of high-quality reading comprehension resources in low-resource settings.

The paper compares the performance of LLM-generated datasets to those created by human experts. It looks at factors like the quality of the questions and answers, how well they align with the passage content, and how well models trained on the datasets perform on reading comprehension tasks. The researchers also discuss the potential benefits and limitations of using LLMs in this way, such as the ability to quickly generate large amounts of data versus potential biases or errors in the LLM-created content.

Overall, the paper provides insights into whether LLMs can be a useful tool for expanding reading comprehension datasets, particularly in domains or languages that currently lack sufficient human-annotated resources.

Technical Explanation

The paper first reviews related work on the use of LLMs for generating reading comprehension datasets and other NLP applications. It then outlines the experimental setup used in the study.

The researchers used the GPT-3 LLM to generate reading comprehension questions and answers for a set of passages. They compared the quality of the LLM-generated content to human-created datasets across a range of metrics, including question-answer alignment, question difficulty, and the performance of reading comprehension models trained on the different datasets.

The results suggest that LLMs can generate reading comprehension questions and answers that are comparable in quality to human-created datasets, with the potential to quickly produce large-scale datasets. However, the researchers also identify several challenges, such as the LLM's tendency to introduce factual errors or biases, and the difficulty of controlling the difficulty level and other properties of the generated content.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough evaluation of using LLMs as a tool for augmenting reading comprehension datasets, but it also acknowledges several important limitations and areas for further research.

One key limitation is the potential for LLM-generated content to contain factual inaccuracies or biases. While the researchers found that LLM-generated questions and answers can be of high quality, there were still some issues with alignment to the passage content and the introduction of incorrect information. Addressing these challenges will be important for ensuring the reliability and validity of LLM-augmented datasets.

Additionally, the paper notes that fine-tuning or prompting the LLM to generate content with specific characteristics (e.g., difficulty level) can be challenging. Further research is needed to develop more sophisticated techniques for controlling the properties of LLM-generated reading comprehension items.

Another area for future work is exploring the generalizability of these findings. The study focused on a single LLM (GPT-3) and a limited set of passages and tasks. Expanding the research to evaluate a wider range of LLMs, domains, and reading comprehension benchmarks could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the opportunities and limitations of this approach.

Despite these caveats, the paper makes a valuable contribution by demonstrating the potential of LLMs to accelerate the creation of reading comprehension datasets, particularly in low-resource settings. As NLP systems continue to advance, techniques like those explored in this research could play an important role in expanding the available data and improving the robustness of natural language understanding capabilities.

Conclusion

This paper investigates the use of large language models (LLMs) to augment low-resource reading comprehension datasets. The results suggest that LLMs can generate high-quality reading comprehension questions and answers, potentially allowing for the rapid creation of large-scale datasets in a more efficient manner than traditional human annotation approaches.

However, the research also highlights several challenges, including the potential for LLM-generated content to contain factual errors or biases, and the difficulty of controlling specific properties (like difficulty level) of the generated items. Further work is needed to address these limitations and explore the generalizability of the findings across a wider range of LLMs, domains, and reading comprehension benchmarks.

Overall, this paper provides valuable insights into the opportunities and trade-offs of using LLMs to supplement or expand reading comprehension datasets, which are critical resources for training and evaluating natural language processing systems. As the field of NLP continues to advance, techniques like those explored in this research could play an important role in democratizing the creation of high-quality language understanding datasets, particularly in low-resource settings.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Can LLMs Augment Low-Resource Reading Comprehension Datasets? Opportunities and Challenges
Total Score

0

Can LLMs Augment Low-Resource Reading Comprehension Datasets? Opportunities and Challenges

Vinay Samuel, Houda Aynaou, Arijit Ghosh Chowdhury, Karthik Venkat Ramanan, Aman Chadha

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive zero shot performance on a wide range of NLP tasks, demonstrating the ability to reason and apply commonsense. A relevant application is to use them for creating high quality synthetic datasets for downstream tasks. In this work, we probe whether GPT-4 can be used to augment existing extractive reading comprehension datasets. Automating data annotation processes has the potential to save large amounts of time, money and effort that goes into manually labelling datasets. In this paper, we evaluate the performance of GPT-4 as a replacement for human annotators for low resource reading comprehension tasks, by comparing performance after fine tuning, and the cost associated with annotation. This work serves to be the first analysis of LLMs as synthetic data augmenters for QA systems, highlighting the unique opportunities and challenges. Additionally, we release augmented versions of low resource datasets, that will allow the research community to create further benchmarks for evaluation of generated datasets.

Read more

7/11/2024

💬

Total Score

0

From Text to Insight: Leveraging Large Language Models for Performance Evaluation in Management

Ning Li, Huaikang Zhou, Mingze Xu

This study explores the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT-4, to enhance objectivity in organizational task performance evaluations. Through comparative analyses across two studies, including various task performance outputs, we demonstrate that LLMs can serve as a reliable and even superior alternative to human raters in evaluating knowledge-based performance outputs, which are a key contribution of knowledge workers. Our results suggest that GPT ratings are comparable to human ratings but exhibit higher consistency and reliability. Additionally, combined multiple GPT ratings on the same performance output show strong correlations with aggregated human performance ratings, akin to the consensus principle observed in performance evaluation literature. However, we also find that LLMs are prone to contextual biases, such as the halo effect, mirroring human evaluative biases. Our research suggests that while LLMs are capable of extracting meaningful constructs from text-based data, their scope is currently limited to specific forms of performance evaluation. By highlighting both the potential and limitations of LLMs, our study contributes to the discourse on AI role in management studies and sets a foundation for future research to refine AI theoretical and practical applications in management.

Read more

8/13/2024

The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation
Total Score

0

The Effectiveness of LLMs as Annotators: A Comparative Overview and Empirical Analysis of Direct Representation

Maja Pavlovic, Massimo Poesio

Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful support tools across various natural language tasks and a range of application domains. Recent studies focus on exploring their capabilities for data annotation. This paper provides a comparative overview of twelve studies investigating the potential of LLMs in labelling data. While the models demonstrate promising cost and time-saving benefits, there exist considerable limitations, such as representativeness, bias, sensitivity to prompt variations and English language preference. Leveraging insights from these studies, our empirical analysis further examines the alignment between human and GPT-generated opinion distributions across four subjective datasets. In contrast to the studies examining representation, our methodology directly obtains the opinion distribution from GPT. Our analysis thereby supports the minority of studies that are considering diverse perspectives when evaluating data annotation tasks and highlights the need for further research in this direction.

Read more

5/3/2024

From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs
Total Score

0

From Text to Emotion: Unveiling the Emotion Annotation Capabilities of LLMs

Minxue Niu (University of Michigan), Mimansa Jaiswal (Independent Researcher), Emily Mower Provost (University of Michigan)

Training emotion recognition models has relied heavily on human annotated data, which present diversity, quality, and cost challenges. In this paper, we explore the potential of Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically GPT4, in automating or assisting emotion annotation. We compare GPT4 with supervised models and or humans in three aspects: agreement with human annotations, alignment with human perception, and impact on model training. We find that common metrics that use aggregated human annotations as ground truth can underestimate the performance, of GPT-4 and our human evaluation experiment reveals a consistent preference for GPT-4 annotations over humans across multiple datasets and evaluators. Further, we investigate the impact of using GPT-4 as an annotation filtering process to improve model training. Together, our findings highlight the great potential of LLMs in emotion annotation tasks and underscore the need for refined evaluation methodologies.

Read more

9/2/2024