Clarifying Myths About the Relationship Between Shape Bias, Accuracy, and Robustness
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
• This paper examines the relationship between a model's shape bias, its accuracy, and its robustness to out-of-distribution (OOD) data.
• The authors aim to clarify common myths and misconceptions around these concepts, providing a more nuanced understanding of how they interact.
Plain English Explanation
• Shape bias refers to a model's tendency to focus on the overall shape of an object, rather than specific details, when making predictions. This can be a useful inductive bias, but it has been associated with both improved accuracy and reduced OOD robustness.
• Accuracy measures how well a model performs on the specific task it was trained for, typically using in-domain data.
• Robustness refers to a model's ability to maintain good performance when faced with data that is different from what it was trained on (OOD data).
• The paper explores the complex relationships between these three concepts, challenging some common assumptions. For example, it suggests that shape bias does not necessarily lead to improved in-domain accuracy, and that there may not be a straightforward trade-off between accuracy and OOD robustness.
• The authors use a combination of theoretical analysis and empirical experiments to provide a more nuanced understanding of these topics, with potential implications for model design and training.
Technical Explanation
• The paper begins by reviewing the existing literature on shape bias, accuracy, and robustness, highlighting the common myths and misconceptions in this area.
• It then presents a theoretical analysis that examines the relationship between these concepts, using a simple binary classification task as a model system.
• The authors conduct a series of experiments on various image classification datasets, including CIFAR-10, MNIST, and Imagenet, to empirically validate their theoretical insights.
• The experiments explore the effects of different data augmentation techniques, which can be used to modulate a model's shape bias, on both in-domain accuracy and OOD robustness.
• The results challenge the common assumption that increased shape bias necessarily leads to higher accuracy, and suggest a more complex relationship between these factors.
Critical Analysis
• The paper provides a nuanced and thoughtful analysis of the relationship between shape bias, accuracy, and robustness, moving beyond simplistic tradeoffs or assumptions.
• However, the theoretical analysis relies on a relatively simple binary classification task, and it's unclear how well the insights would scale to more complex real-world problems.
• The empirical experiments are well-designed and cover a range of datasets, but they still represent a limited set of conditions. Additional research would be needed to fully understand the generalizability of the findings.
• The authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work, such as the need to explore the role of other inductive biases beyond shape, and the potential impact of different model architectures and training regimes.
Conclusion
• This paper offers a valuable contribution to the ongoing discussion around the relationship between shape bias, accuracy, and robustness in machine learning models.
• By challenging common myths and providing a more nuanced understanding of these concepts, the authors' work has the potential to inform the development of more effective and reliable models, particularly in domains where OOD robustness is a critical concern.
• The insights from this research could be leveraged to improve model resilience and mitigate the risks of out-of-distribution data, ultimately leading to more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Clarifying Myths About the Relationship Between Shape Bias, Accuracy, and Robustness
Zahra Golpayegani, Patrick St-Amant, Nizar Bouguila
Deep learning models can perform well when evaluated on images from the same distribution as the training set. However, applying small perturbations in the forms of noise, artifacts, occlusions, blurring, etc. to a model's input image and feeding the model with out-of-distribution (OOD) data can significantly drop the model's accuracy, making it not applicable to real-world scenarios. Data augmentation is one of the well-practiced methods to improve model robustness against OOD data; however, examining which augmentation type to choose and how it affects the OOD robustness remains understudied. There is a growing belief that augmenting datasets using data augmentations that improve a model's bias to shape-based features rather than texture-based features results in increased OOD robustness for Convolutional Neural Networks trained on the ImageNet-1K dataset. This is usually stated as ``an increase in the model's shape bias results in an increase in its OOD robustness. Based on this hypothesis, some works in the literature aim to find augmentations with higher effects on model shape bias and use those for data augmentation. By evaluating 39 types of data augmentations on a widely used OOD dataset, we demonstrate the impact of each data augmentation on the model's robustness to OOD data and further show that the mentioned hypothesis is not true; an increase in shape bias does not necessarily result in higher OOD robustness. By analyzing the results, we also find some biases in the ImageNet-1K dataset that can easily be reduced using proper data augmentation. Our evaluation results further show that there is not necessarily a trade-off between in-domain accuracy and OOD robustness, and choosing the proper augmentations can help increase both in-domain accuracy and OOD robustness simultaneously.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Structuring a Training Strategy to Robustify Perception Models with Realistic Image Augmentations
Ahmed Hammam, Bharathwaj Krishnaswami Sreedhar, Nura Kawa, Tim Patzelt, Oliver De Candido
Advancing Machine Learning (ML)-based perception models for autonomous systems necessitates addressing weak spots within the models, particularly in challenging Operational Design Domains (ODDs). These are environmental operating conditions of an autonomous vehicle which can contain difficult conditions, e.g., lens flare at night or objects reflected in a wet street. This report introduces a novel methodology for training with augmentations to enhance model robustness and performance in such conditions. The proposed approach leverages customized physics-based augmentation functions, to generate realistic training data that simulates diverse ODD scenarios. We present a comprehensive framework that includes identifying weak spots in ML models, selecting suitable augmentations, and devising effective training strategies. The methodology integrates hyperparameter optimization and latent space optimization to fine-tune augmentation parameters, ensuring they maximally improve the ML models' performance. Experimental results demonstrate improvements in model performance, as measured by commonly used metrics such as mean Average Precision (mAP) and mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) on open-source object detection and semantic segmentation models and datasets. Our findings emphasize that optimal training strategies are model- and data-specific and highlight the benefits of integrating augmentations into the training pipeline. By incorporating augmentations, we observe enhanced robustness of ML-based perception models, making them more resilient to edge cases encountered in real-world ODDs. This work underlines the importance of customized augmentations and offers an effective solution for improving the safety and reliability of autonomous driving functions.
Read more9/2/2024
0
Boosting Model Resilience via Implicit Adversarial Data Augmentation
Xiaoling Zhou, Wei Ye, Zhemg Lee, Rui Xie, Shikun Zhang
Data augmentation plays a pivotal role in enhancing and diversifying training data. Nonetheless, consistently improving model performance in varied learning scenarios, especially those with inherent data biases, remains challenging. To address this, we propose to augment the deep features of samples by incorporating their adversarial and anti-adversarial perturbation distributions, enabling adaptive adjustment in the learning difficulty tailored to each sample's specific characteristics. We then theoretically reveal that our augmentation process approximates the optimization of a surrogate loss function as the number of augmented copies increases indefinitely. This insight leads us to develop a meta-learning-based framework for optimizing classifiers with this novel loss, introducing the effects of augmentation while bypassing the explicit augmentation process. We conduct extensive experiments across four common biased learning scenarios: long-tail learning, generalized long-tail learning, noisy label learning, and subpopulation shift learning. The empirical results demonstrate that our method consistently achieves state-of-the-art performance, highlighting its broad adaptability.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Out-of-Distribution Data: An Acquaintance of Adversarial Examples -- A Survey
Naveen Karunanayake, Ravin Gunawardena, Suranga Seneviratne, Sanjay Chawla
Deep neural networks (DNNs) deployed in real-world applications can encounter out-of-distribution (OOD) data and adversarial examples. These represent distinct forms of distributional shifts that can significantly impact DNNs' reliability and robustness. Traditionally, research has addressed OOD detection and adversarial robustness as separate challenges. This survey focuses on the intersection of these two areas, examining how the research community has investigated them together. Consequently, we identify two key research directions: robust OOD detection and unified robustness. Robust OOD detection aims to differentiate between in-distribution (ID) data and OOD data, even when they are adversarially manipulated to deceive the OOD detector. Unified robustness seeks a single approach to make DNNs robust against both adversarial attacks and OOD inputs. Accordingly, first, we establish a taxonomy based on the concept of distributional shifts. This framework clarifies how robust OOD detection and unified robustness relate to other research areas addressing distributional shifts, such as OOD detection, open set recognition, and anomaly detection. Subsequently, we review existing work on robust OOD detection and unified robustness. Finally, we highlight the limitations of the existing work and propose promising research directions that explore adversarial and OOD inputs within a unified framework.
Read more4/9/2024