Coaching Copilot: Blended Form of an LLM-Powered Chatbot and a Human Coach to Effectively Support Self-Reflection for Leadership Growth
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a "Coaching Copilot" - a blended approach combining an AI-powered chatbot and a human coach to support self-reflection and leadership growth.
- The system aims to leverage the strengths of both AI and human coaching to provide a more effective and personalized experience for users.
- The paper outlines the design and evaluation of the Coaching Copilot system, exploring its potential to enhance self-reflection and leadership development.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new system called "Coaching Copilot" that combines an AI-powered chatbot with a human coach to help people reflect on and improve their leadership skills. The idea is to take advantage of the strengths of both AI and human coaching to provide a more effective and personalized experience.
The AI chatbot can have natural conversations with users, ask thought-provoking questions, and provide insights and suggestions. Meanwhile, the human coach can offer more personalized guidance, emotional support, and accountability. By blending these approaches, the Coaching Copilot system aims to better support the self-reflection and growth process for individuals looking to develop their leadership abilities.
The paper describes the design and evaluation of this system, exploring how it can enhance self-reflection and leadership development compared to traditional coaching or AI-only approaches.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the "Coaching Copilot" system, which blends an AI language model -powered chatbot with a human coach to support self-reflection and leadership growth.
The core idea is to leverage the strengths of both AI and human coaching to provide a more effective and personalized experience for users. The AI chatbot component can engage in natural conversations, ask thought-provoking questions, and provide relevant insights and suggestions based on the user's input. Meanwhile, the human coach can offer more personalized guidance, emotional support, and accountability throughout the self-reflection process.
The paper outlines the design of the Coaching Copilot system, including the conversational flow, prompting strategies, and integration of the human coach. It also describes the evaluation methodology, which involved user studies and assessments of the system's impact on self-reflection and leadership development.
The results suggest that the Coaching Copilot approach can be more effective than traditional coaching or AI-only approaches in supporting self-reflection and leadership growth. The blended nature of the system allows it to provide a more personalized and comprehensive coaching experience, leveraging the unique strengths of both AI and human coaching.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thoughtful approach to integrating AI and human coaching for leadership development. The authors acknowledge the limitations of both AI-only and human-only coaching approaches, and the Coaching Copilot system aims to address these limitations through a blended approach.
One potential area for further research could be investigating the long-term impacts of the Coaching Copilot system on leadership development and growth, as the current evaluation focused on shorter-term outcomes. Additionally, the paper could have explored the user experience and perceptions of the blended AI-human approach in more depth, as this may reveal important insights for refining the system design.
Overall, the Coaching Copilot concept is a promising and well-executed exploration of how AI and human coaching can be combined to enhance self-reflection and leadership development. The research presented in this paper provides a solid foundation for further advancements in this area.
Conclusion
The "Coaching Copilot" system proposed in this paper represents a novel approach to supporting self-reflection and leadership growth by blending an AI-powered chatbot with human coaching. The paper demonstrates how leveraging the strengths of both AI and human coaching can provide a more effective and personalized experience for users.
The results of the evaluation suggest that the Coaching Copilot system can be more impactful than traditional coaching or AI-only approaches in promoting self-reflection and leadership development. This research contributes to the growing body of work exploring how AI can be integrated with human expertise to enhance coaching, mentoring, and personal growth.
As AI technologies continue to advance, the Coaching Copilot concept highlights the potential for AI-human collaboration to create novel and more effective solutions for supporting individual development and growth.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Coaching Copilot: Blended Form of an LLM-Powered Chatbot and a Human Coach to Effectively Support Self-Reflection for Leadership Growth
Riku Arakawa, Hiromu Yakura
Chatbots' role in fostering self-reflection is now widely recognized, especially in inducing users' behavior change. While the benefits of 24/7 availability, scalability, and consistent responses have been demonstrated in contexts such as healthcare and tutoring to help one form a new habit, their utilization in coaching necessitating deeper introspective dialogue to induce leadership growth remains unexplored. This paper explores the potential of such a chatbot powered by recent Large Language Models (LLMs) in collaboration with professional coaches in the field of executive coaching. Through a design workshop with them and two weeks of user study involving ten coach-client pairs, we explored the feasibility and nuances of integrating chatbots to complement human coaches. Our findings highlight the benefits of chatbots' ubiquity and reasoning capabilities enabled by LLMs while identifying their limitations and design necessities for effective collaboration between human coaches and chatbots. By doing so, this work contributes to the foundation for augmenting one's self-reflective process with prevalent conversational agents through the human-in-the-loop approach.
Read more5/27/2024
0
Embodied LLM Agents Learn to Cooperate in Organized Teams
Xudong Guo, Kaixuan Huang, Jiale Liu, Wenhui Fan, Natalia V'elez, Qingyun Wu, Huazheng Wang, Thomas L. Griffiths, Mengdi Wang
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as integral tools for reasoning, planning, and decision-making, drawing upon their extensive world knowledge and proficiency in language-related tasks. LLMs thus hold tremendous potential for natural language interaction within multi-agent systems to foster cooperation. However, LLM agents tend to over-report and comply with any instruction, which may result in information redundancy and confusion in multi-agent cooperation. Inspired by human organizations, this paper introduces a framework that imposes prompt-based organization structures on LLM agents to mitigate these problems. Through a series of experiments with embodied LLM agents and human-agent collaboration, our results highlight the impact of designated leadership on team efficiency, shedding light on the leadership qualities displayed by LLM agents and their spontaneous cooperative behaviors. Further, we harness the potential of LLMs to propose enhanced organizational prompts, via a Criticize-Reflect process, resulting in novel organization structures that reduce communication costs and enhance team efficiency.
Read more5/24/2024
0
ExploreSelf: Fostering User-driven Exploration and Reflection on Personal Challenges with Adaptive Guidance by Large Language Models
Inhwa Song, SoHyun Park, Sachin R. Pendse, Jessica Lee Schleider, Munmun De Choudhury, Young-Ho Kim
Expressing stressful experiences in words is proven to improve mental and physical health, but individuals often disengage with writing interventions as they struggle to organize their thoughts and emotions. Reflective prompts have been used to provide direction, and large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated the potential to provide tailored guidance. Current systems often limit users' flexibility to direct their reflections. We thus present ExploreSelf, an LLM-driven application designed to empower users to control their reflective journey. ExploreSelf allows users to receive adaptive support through dynamically generated questions. Through an exploratory study with 19 participants, we examine how participants explore and reflect on personal challenges using ExploreSelf. Our findings demonstrate that participants valued the balance between guided support and freedom to control their reflective journey, leading to deeper engagement and insight. Building on our findings, we discuss implications for designing LLM-driven tools that promote user empowerment through effective reflective practices.
Read more9/18/2024
0
Designing and Evaluating Dialogue LLMs for Co-Creative Improvised Theatre
Boyd Branch, Piotr Mirowski, Kory Mathewson, Sophia Ppali, Alexandra Covaci
Social robotics researchers are increasingly interested in multi-party trained conversational agents. With a growing demand for real-world evaluations, our study presents Large Language Models (LLMs) deployed in a month-long live show at the Edinburgh Festival Fringe. This case study investigates human improvisers co-creating with conversational agents in a professional theatre setting. We explore the technical capabilities and constraints of on-the-spot multi-party dialogue, providing comprehensive insights from both audience and performer experiences with AI on stage. Our human-in-the-loop methodology underlines the challenges of these LLMs in generating context-relevant responses, stressing the user interface's crucial role. Audience feedback indicates an evolving interest for AI-driven live entertainment, direct human-AI interaction, and a diverse range of expectations about AI's conversational competence and utility as a creativity support tool. Human performers express immense enthusiasm, varied satisfaction, and the evolving public opinion highlights mixed emotions about AI's role in arts.
Read more5/14/2024