Combine and Conquer: A Meta-Analysis on Data Shift and Out-of-Distribution Detection
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a meta-analysis on the topic of data shift and out-of-distribution (OOD) detection in machine learning.
- The researchers investigate various approaches for detecting when a model's input data differs significantly from the training data, which can lead to poor performance.
- They explore techniques like rethinking evaluation for OOD detection, continual unsupervised OOD detection, and OOD detection in medical image analysis.
Plain English Explanation
Machine learning models are often trained on a specific set of data, but in the real world, they may encounter data that looks quite different. This "data shift" can cause the model to perform poorly, making incorrect predictions. The researchers in this paper investigate ways to detect when a model is seeing data that is very different from what it was trained on, known as "out-of-distribution" (OOD) data.
They look at a variety of techniques that have been proposed to address this problem, such as rethinking how we evaluate OOD detection, developing continual unsupervised OOD detection methods, and applying OOD detection to medical image analysis. The goal is to give machine learning models a better understanding of when they are seeing something completely new, so they can either avoid making predictions or handle the new data more appropriately.
Technical Explanation
The paper reviews a range of research on data shift and OOD detection, including techniques like rethinking evaluation for OOD detection to address the challenges of measuring OOD performance, continual unsupervised OOD detection to enable models to continuously adapt to new data distributions, and applying OOD detection to medical image analysis where it is crucial to identify anomalies.
The paper also covers more recent advances, such as scaling OOD detection to multiple modalities and developing OOD rejection options to handle dataset shift. Through this comprehensive review, the authors aim to provide a holistic understanding of the current state of research in this area and identify promising directions for future work.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough overview of the research landscape on data shift and OOD detection, highlighting both the progress made and the remaining challenges in this field. However, the authors acknowledge that the performance of OOD detection methods can be highly dependent on the specific dataset and task, and more robust evaluation approaches are needed to fully understand their capabilities.
Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the potential biases and limitations of the reviewed techniques, such as their sensitivity to the choice of training data or the risk of overconfident OOD predictions. Further research is needed to address these issues and ensure the reliable deployment of OOD detection in real-world applications, especially in high-stakes domains like medical imaging.
Conclusion
This meta-analysis on data shift and OOD detection provides a comprehensive summary of the current state of research in this important area of machine learning. The paper highlights the various approaches that have been explored, from rethinking evaluation methods to developing continual and multimodal OOD detection techniques.
The insights from this review can help researchers and practitioners better understand the challenges and potential solutions for building machine learning models that can reliably operate in the face of changing and unexpected data distributions. As the field continues to evolve, further advancements in OOD detection could lead to more robust and trustworthy AI systems across a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Combine and Conquer: A Meta-Analysis on Data Shift and Out-of-Distribution Detection
Eduardo Dadalto, Florence Alberge, Pierre Duhamel, Pablo Piantanida
This paper introduces a universal approach to seamlessly combine out-of-distribution (OOD) detection scores. These scores encompass a wide range of techniques that leverage the self-confidence of deep learning models and the anomalous behavior of features in the latent space. Not surprisingly, combining such a varied population using simple statistics proves inadequate. To overcome this challenge, we propose a quantile normalization to map these scores into p-values, effectively framing the problem into a multi-variate hypothesis test. Then, we combine these tests using established meta-analysis tools, resulting in a more effective detector with consolidated decision boundaries. Furthermore, we create a probabilistic interpretable criterion by mapping the final statistics into a distribution with known parameters. Through empirical investigation, we explore different types of shifts, each exerting varying degrees of impact on data. Our results demonstrate that our approach significantly improves overall robustness and performance across diverse OOD detection scenarios. Notably, our framework is easily extensible for future developments in detection scores and stands as the first to combine decision boundaries in this context. The code and artifacts associated with this work are publicly availablefootnote{url{https://github.com/edadaltocg/detectors}}.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Improving Out-of-Distribution Detection by Combining Existing Post-hoc Methods
Paul Novello, Yannick Prudent, Joseba Dalmau, Corentin Friedrich, Yann Pequignot
Since the seminal paper of Hendrycks et al. arXiv:1610.02136, Post-hoc deep Out-of-Distribution (OOD) detection has expanded rapidly. As a result, practitioners working on safety-critical applications and seeking to improve the robustness of a neural network now have a plethora of methods to choose from. However, no method outperforms every other on every dataset arXiv:2210.07242, so the current best practice is to test all the methods on the datasets at hand. This paper shifts focus from developing new methods to effectively combining existing ones to enhance OOD detection. We propose and compare four different strategies for integrating multiple detection scores into a unified OOD detector, based on techniques such as majority vote, empirical and copulas-based Cumulative Distribution Function modeling, and multivariate quantiles based on optimal transport. We extend common OOD evaluation metrics -- like AUROC and FPR at fixed TPR rates -- to these multi-dimensional OOD detectors, allowing us to evaluate them and compare them with individual methods on extensive benchmarks. Furthermore, we propose a series of guidelines to choose what OOD detectors to combine in more realistic settings, i.e. in the absence of known OOD data, relying on principles drawn from Outlier Exposure arXiv:1812.04606. The code is available at https://github.com/paulnovello/multi-ood.
Read more7/11/2024
0
Rethinking the Evaluation of Out-of-Distribution Detection: A Sorites Paradox
Xingming Long, Jie Zhang, Shiguang Shan, Xilin Chen
Most existing out-of-distribution (OOD) detection benchmarks classify samples with novel labels as the OOD data. However, some marginal OOD samples actually have close semantic contents to the in-distribution (ID) sample, which makes determining the OOD sample a Sorites Paradox. In this paper, we construct a benchmark named Incremental Shift OOD (IS-OOD) to address the issue, in which we divide the test samples into subsets with different semantic and covariate shift degrees relative to the ID dataset. The data division is achieved through a shift measuring method based on our proposed Language Aligned Image feature Decomposition (LAID). Moreover, we construct a Synthetic Incremental Shift (Syn-IS) dataset that contains high-quality generated images with more diverse covariate contents to complement the IS-OOD benchmark. We evaluate current OOD detection methods on our benchmark and find several important insights: (1) The performance of most OOD detection methods significantly improves as the semantic shift increases; (2) Some methods like GradNorm may have different OOD detection mechanisms as they rely less on semantic shifts to make decisions; (3) Excessive covariate shifts in the image are also likely to be considered as OOD for some methods. Our code and data are released in https://github.com/qqwsad5/IS-OOD.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Dissecting Out-of-Distribution Detection and Open-Set Recognition: A Critical Analysis of Methods and Benchmarks
Hongjun Wang, Sagar Vaze, Kai Han
Detecting test-time distribution shift has emerged as a key capability for safely deployed machine learning models, with the question being tackled under various guises in recent years. In this paper, we aim to provide a consolidated view of the two largest sub-fields within the community: out-of-distribution (OOD) detection and open-set recognition (OSR). In particular, we aim to provide rigorous empirical analysis of different methods across settings and provide actionable takeaways for practitioners and researchers. Concretely, we make the following contributions: (i) We perform rigorous cross-evaluation between state-of-the-art methods in the OOD detection and OSR settings and identify a strong correlation between the performances of methods for them; (ii) We propose a new, large-scale benchmark setting which we suggest better disentangles the problem tackled by OOD detection and OSR, re-evaluating state-of-the-art OOD detection and OSR methods in this setting; (iii) We surprisingly find that the best performing method on standard benchmarks (Outlier Exposure) struggles when tested at scale, while scoring rules which are sensitive to the deep feature magnitude consistently show promise; and (iv) We conduct empirical analysis to explain these phenomena and highlight directions for future research. Code: https://github.com/Visual-AI/Dissect-OOD-OSR
Read more9/2/2024