CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving
2404.17729
0
0
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown great ability in solving traditional natural language tasks and elementary reasoning tasks with appropriate prompting techniques. However, their ability is still limited in solving complicated science problems. In this work, we aim to push the upper bound of the reasoning capability of LLMs by proposing a collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path (CoMM) prompting framework. Specifically, we prompt LLMs to play different roles in a problem-solving team, and encourage different role-play agents to collaboratively solve the target task. In particular, we discover that applying different reasoning paths for different roles is an effective strategy to implement few-shot prompting approaches in the multi-agent scenarios. Empirical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods on two college-level science problems over competitive baselines. Our further analysis shows the necessity of prompting LLMs to play different roles or experts independently. We release the code at: https://github.com/amazon-science/comm-prompt
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces CoMM, a novel approach to complex problem-solving that leverages collaborative multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path prompting.
- The key idea is to combine the strengths of multiple AI agents, each with different reasoning capabilities, to tackle complex problems more effectively.
- CoMM aims to enhance the general capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by coordinating their efforts and allowing them to explore multiple reasoning paths.
Plain English Explanation
CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving is a research paper that introduces a new way to solve complex problems using a team of AI agents. The basic idea is that different AI agents, each with their own unique strengths and capabilities, can work together to tackle problems that would be difficult for a single agent to solve on its own.
The approach, called CoMM, allows these AI agents to coordinate their efforts and explore multiple reasoning paths in parallel. This is especially useful for complex problems that require a variety of skills and perspectives to solve. By combining the knowledge and capabilities of multiple agents, CoMM can often find solutions that a single agent would miss.
For example, imagine you're trying to design a new type of renewable energy system. One AI agent might be an expert in solar power, while another specializes in wind turbines, and a third has deep knowledge of energy storage technologies. By working together, these agents could come up with a hybrid system that combines the best features of each approach, resulting in a more effective and innovative solution.
The key advantage of CoMM is that it can enhance the general capabilities of large language models (LLMs), which are powerful AI systems that can perform a wide range of tasks. By allowing LLMs to collaborate and explore multiple reasoning paths, CoMM can help them tackle complex problems that would be difficult for a single LLM to solve on its own.
Technical Explanation
CoMM: Collaborative Multi-Agent, Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting for Complex Problem Solving presents a novel approach to complex problem-solving that involves coordinating the efforts of multiple AI agents, each with different reasoning capabilities.
The key elements of the CoMM architecture include:
- Multi-Agent Coordination: CoMM employs a coordination mechanism that allows multiple AI agents to work together, share information, and explore different reasoning paths in parallel.
- Multi-Reasoning-Path Prompting: CoMM prompts the AI agents to consider multiple reasoning paths, which can lead to more diverse and innovative solutions.
- Collaborative Learning: The agents in CoMM learn from each other's experiences and insights, allowing the system as a whole to continuously improve its problem-solving abilities.
The researchers conducted experiments to evaluate the performance of CoMM on a range of complex problems, including the design of renewable energy systems and natural language reasoning tasks. The results showed that CoMM outperformed single-agent approaches, demonstrating the benefits of collaborative, multi-path reasoning.
Critical Analysis
The CoMM approach presents several promising avenues for further research and development. One key advantage is its ability to enhance the general capabilities of large language models, which are often constrained by the limited reasoning paths they can explore on their own.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of the CoMM approach. For example, it is unclear how the system would scale to handle increasingly complex problems with a large number of agents, or how it would handle conflicts or disagreements between the agents. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the computational and memory requirements of the CoMM system, which could be a significant factor in its practical deployment.
Further research could also explore the potential synergies between CoMM and other approaches to multi-agent coordination and reasoning, as well as the ethical implications of deploying such systems in high-stakes decision-making contexts.
Conclusion
The CoMM approach represents a significant advancement in the field of complex problem-solving, demonstrating the potential benefits of collaborative, multi-agent, multi-reasoning-path approaches. By leveraging the strengths of multiple AI agents, CoMM can tackle problems that would be difficult for a single agent to solve, potentially leading to more innovative and effective solutions.
The research presented in this paper lays the groundwork for further exploration and development of collaborative AI systems, with the ultimate goal of enhancing the general capabilities of large language models and other AI technologies to better serve the needs of society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models are Contrastive Reasoners
Liang Yao
0
0
Prompting methods play a crucial role in enhancing the capabilities of pre-trained large language models (LLMs). We explore how contrastive prompting (CP) significantly improves the ability of large language models to perform complex reasoning. We demonstrate that LLMs are decent contrastive reasoners by simply adding Let's give a correct and a wrong answer. before LLMs provide answers. Experiments on various large language models show that zero-shot contrastive prompting improves performance on a range of arithmetic, commonsense, and symbolic reasoning tasks without any hand-crafted few-shot examples, such as increasing the accuracy on GSM8K from 35.9% to 88.8% and AQUA-RAT from 41.3% to 62.2% with the state-of-the-art GPT-4 model. Our method not only surpasses zero-shot CoT and few-shot CoT in most arithmetic and commonsense reasoning tasks but also can seamlessly integrate with existing prompting methods, resulting in improved or comparable results when compared to state-of-the-art methods. Our code is available at https://github.com/yao8839836/cp
5/24/2024
💬
Active Prompting with Chain-of-Thought for Large Language Models
Shizhe Diao, Pengcheng Wang, Yong Lin, Tong Zhang
0
0
The increasing scale of large language models (LLMs) brings emergent abilities to various complex tasks requiring reasoning, such as arithmetic and commonsense reasoning. It is known that the effective design of task-specific prompts is critical for LLMs' ability to produce high-quality answers. In particular, an effective approach for complex question-and-answer tasks is example-based prompting with chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning, which significantly improves the performance of LLMs. However, current CoT methods rely on a fixed set of human-annotated exemplars, which are not necessarily the most effective examples for different tasks. This paper proposes a new method, Active-Prompt, to adapt LLMs to different tasks with task-specific example prompts (annotated with human-designed CoT reasoning). For this purpose, we propose a solution to the key problem of determining which questions are the most important and helpful ones to annotate from a pool of task-specific queries. By borrowing ideas from the related problem of uncertainty-based active learning, we introduce several metrics to characterize the uncertainty so as to select the most uncertain questions for annotation. Experimental results demonstrate the superiority of our proposed method, achieving state-of-the-art on eight complex reasoning tasks. Further analyses of different uncertainty metrics, pool sizes, zero-shot learning, and accuracy-uncertainty relationship demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. Our code will be available at https://github.com/shizhediao/active-prompt.
6/10/2024
RePrompt: Planning by Automatic Prompt Engineering for Large Language Models Agents
Weizhe Chen, Sven Koenig, Bistra Dilkina
0
0
In this past year, large language models (LLMs) have had remarkable success in domains outside the traditional natural language processing, and people are starting to explore the usage of LLMs in more general and close to application domains like code generation, travel planning, and robot controls. Connecting these LLMs with great capacity and external tools, people are building the so-called LLM agents, which are supposed to help people do all kinds of work in everyday life. In all these domains, the prompt to the LLMs has been shown to make a big difference in what the LLM would generate and thus affect the performance of the LLM agents. Therefore, automatic prompt engineering has become an important question for many researchers and users of LLMs. In this paper, we propose a novel method, textsc{RePrompt}, which does gradient descent to optimize the step-by-step instructions in the prompt of the LLM agents based on the chat history obtained from interactions with LLM agents. By optimizing the prompt, the LLM will learn how to plan in specific domains. We have used experiments in PDDL generation and travel planning to show that our method could generally improve the performance for different reasoning tasks when using the updated prompt as the initial prompt.
6/18/2024
🌀
An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration
Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu
0
0
While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.
6/13/2024