A Comparative Study on Large Language Models for Log Parsing
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This research paper compares the performance of different large language models (LLMs) for the task of log parsing.
- Log parsing is the process of extracting structured information from unstructured log files, which is crucial for various applications like system monitoring, anomaly detection, and troubleshooting.
- The researchers evaluate the effectiveness of popular LLMs, such as GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, in log parsing tasks.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores how well different large language models can be used for log parsing. Log parsing is the process of taking unstructured log files, which are records of events or activities in a computer system, and extracting useful information from them in a structured way. This is important for things like monitoring the health of a system, detecting problems, and troubleshooting issues.
The researchers tested the performance of several well-known large language models, including GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, to see how effective they are at parsing log files. Large language models are powerful AI systems that have been trained on massive amounts of text data and can understand and generate human-like language. The researchers wanted to see if these models could be used effectively for the specialized task of log parsing, which involves understanding the meaning and structure of technical log file entries.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a comparative study on the use of different large language models for the task of log parsing. The researchers evaluated the performance of popular LLMs, such as GPT-3, BERT, and RoBERTa, on a benchmark dataset of log entries.
The experiment design involved fine-tuning the LLMs on a log parsing dataset and then evaluating their performance on various metrics, including parsing accuracy, F1 score, and runtime. The researchers also explored the impact of different fine-tuning strategies and the ability of the LLMs to generalize to unseen log formats.
The results showed that the LLMs, particularly BERT and RoBERTa, demonstrated strong performance on the log parsing task, outperforming traditional log parsing techniques. The paper provides insights into the strengths and limitations of using LLMs for log parsing and discusses potential future research directions in this area.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive evaluation of the use of LLMs for log parsing, which is a valuable contribution to the field. However, the researchers acknowledge that the study is limited to a specific benchmark dataset and may not capture the full complexity of real-world log parsing scenarios.
Additionally, the paper does not delve into the interpretability and explainability of the LLM-based log parsing approach, which could be an important concern in mission-critical applications. Further research is needed to understand the inner workings of the LLMs and their decision-making process in the context of log parsing.
Another potential limitation is the computational cost and resource requirements of fine-tuning and deploying LLMs, which may limit their practicality in some scenarios. The paper does not provide a thorough discussion of these trade-offs.
Conclusion
This research paper presents a comparative study on the use of large language models for the task of log parsing. The results demonstrate the strong performance of LLMs, particularly BERT and RoBERTa, in this domain, suggesting that these models can be effectively leveraged for tasks like system monitoring, anomaly detection, and troubleshooting. The insights from this study can inform the development of more efficient and accurate log parsing solutions, contributing to the broader field of system management and analysis.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Comparative Study on Large Language Models for Log Parsing
Merve Astekin, Max Hort, Leon Moonen
Background: Log messages provide valuable information about the status of software systems. This information is provided in an unstructured fashion and automated approaches are applied to extract relevant parameters. To ease this process, log parsing can be applied, which transforms log messages into structured log templates. Recent advances in language models have led to several studies that apply ChatGPT to the task of log parsing with promising results. However, the performance of other state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on the log parsing task remains unclear. Aims: In this study, we investigate the current capability of state-of-the-art LLMs to perform log parsing. Method: We select six recent LLMs, including both paid proprietary (GPT-3.5, Claude 2.1) and four free-to-use open models, and compare their performance on system logs obtained from a selection of mature open-source projects. We design two different prompting approaches and apply the LLMs on 1, 354 log templates across 16 different projects. We evaluate their effectiveness, in the number of correctly identified templates, and the syntactic similarity between the generated templates and the ground truth. Results: We found that free-to-use models are able to compete with paid models, with CodeLlama extracting 10% more log templates correctly than GPT-3.5. Moreover, we provide qualitative insights into the usability of language models (e.g., how easy it is to use their responses). Conclusions: Our results reveal that some of the smaller, free-to-use LLMs can considerably assist log parsing compared to their paid proprietary competitors, especially code-specialized models.
Read more9/5/2024
0
LLMParser: An Exploratory Study on Using Large Language Models for Log Parsing
Zeyang Ma, An Ran Chen, Dong Jae Kim, Tse-Hsun Chen, Shaowei Wang
Logs are important in modern software development with runtime information. Log parsing is the first step in many log-based analyses, that involve extracting structured information from unstructured log data. Traditional log parsers face challenges in accurately parsing logs due to the diversity of log formats, which directly impacts the performance of downstream log-analysis tasks. In this paper, we explore the potential of using Large Language Models (LLMs) for log parsing and propose LLMParser, an LLM-based log parser based on generative LLMs and few-shot tuning. We leverage four LLMs, Flan-T5-small, Flan-T5-base, LLaMA-7B, and ChatGLM-6B in LLMParsers. Our evaluation of 16 open-source systems shows that LLMParser achieves statistically significantly higher parsing accuracy than state-of-the-art parsers (a 96% average parsing accuracy). We further conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis on the effect of training size, model size, and pre-training LLM on log parsing accuracy. We find that smaller LLMs may be more effective than more complex LLMs; for instance where Flan-T5-base achieves comparable results as LLaMA-7B with a shorter inference time. We also find that using LLMs pre-trained using logs from other systems does not always improve parsing accuracy. While using pre-trained Flan-T5-base shows an improvement in accuracy, pre-trained LLaMA results in a decrease (decrease by almost 55% in group accuracy). In short, our study provides empirical evidence for using LLMs for log parsing and highlights the limitations and future research direction of LLM-based log parsers.
Read more4/30/2024
0
LogParser-LLM: Advancing Efficient Log Parsing with Large Language Models
Aoxiao Zhong, Dengyao Mo, Guiyang Liu, Jinbu Liu, Qingda Lu, Qi Zhou, Jiesheng Wu, Quanzheng Li, Qingsong Wen
Logs are ubiquitous digital footprints, playing an indispensable role in system diagnostics, security analysis, and performance optimization. The extraction of actionable insights from logs is critically dependent on the log parsing process, which converts raw logs into structured formats for downstream analysis. Yet, the complexities of contemporary systems and the dynamic nature of logs pose significant challenges to existing automatic parsing techniques. The emergence of Large Language Models (LLM) offers new horizons. With their expansive knowledge and contextual prowess, LLMs have been transformative across diverse applications. Building on this, we introduce LogParser-LLM, a novel log parser integrated with LLM capabilities. This union seamlessly blends semantic insights with statistical nuances, obviating the need for hyper-parameter tuning and labeled training data, while ensuring rapid adaptability through online parsing. Further deepening our exploration, we address the intricate challenge of parsing granularity, proposing a new metric and integrating human interactions to allow users to calibrate granularity to their specific needs. Our method's efficacy is empirically demonstrated through evaluations on the Loghub-2k and the large-scale LogPub benchmark. In evaluations on the LogPub benchmark, involving an average of 3.6 million logs per dataset across 14 datasets, our LogParser-LLM requires only 272.5 LLM invocations on average, achieving a 90.6% F1 score for grouping accuracy and an 81.1% for parsing accuracy. These results demonstrate the method's high efficiency and accuracy, outperforming current state-of-the-art log parsers, including pattern-based, neural network-based, and existing LLM-enhanced approaches.
Read more8/27/2024
0
Can OpenSource beat ChatGPT? -- A Comparative Study of Large Language Models for Text-to-Code Generation
Luis Mayer, Christian Heumann, Matthias A{ss}enmacher
In recent years, large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools with potential applications in various fields, including software engineering. Within the scope of this research, we evaluate five different state-of-the-art LLMs - Bard, BingChat, ChatGPT, Llama2, and Code Llama - concerning their capabilities for text-to-code generation. In an empirical study, we feed prompts with textual descriptions of coding problems sourced from the programming website LeetCode to the models with the task of creating solutions in Python. Subsequently, the quality of the generated outputs is assessed using the testing functionalities of LeetCode. The results indicate large differences in performance between the investigated models. ChatGPT can handle these typical programming challenges by far the most effectively, surpassing even code-specialized models like Code Llama. To gain further insights, we measure the runtime as well as the memory usage of the generated outputs and compared them to the other code submissions on Leetcode. A detailed error analysis, encompassing a comparison of the differences concerning correct indentation and form of the generated code as well as an assignment of the incorrectly solved tasks to certain error categories allows us to obtain a more nuanced picture of the results and potential for improvement. The results also show a clear pattern of increasingly incorrect produced code when the models are facing a lot of context in the form of longer prompts.
Read more9/9/2024