Compressed models are NOT miniature versions of large models

Read original: arXiv:2407.13174 - Published 7/19/2024 by Rohit Raj Rai, Rishant Pal, Amit Awekar

🌿

Overview

The paper examines the relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts, challenging the assumption that compressed models are simply miniature versions of larger models.
It explores the characteristics of compressed models and how they differ from their larger counterparts, with a focus on the BERT language model.
The research provides insights into the nature of model compression and its impact on model performance and behavior.

Plain English Explanation

When it comes to machine learning models, the idea of "bigger is better" is often assumed. However, this paper challenges that assumption by examining the relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts. Compressed models are versions of larger models that have been reduced in size, often to improve efficiency or make them more practical for deployment on devices with limited resources.

The paper's key finding is that compressed models are not simply miniature versions of their larger counterparts. Instead, they have unique characteristics that set them apart. For example, the researchers looked at the BERT language model, which is a popular model used for tasks like text understanding and generation. They found that when BERT is compressed, the compressed version behaves differently than the original, larger BERT model.

This research provides important insights into the nature of model compression and how it can impact a model's performance and behavior. It suggests that the relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts is more complex than previously thought.

Technical Explanation

The paper explores the characteristics of compressed models, using the BERT language model as a case study. The researchers compared the behavior of the full-size BERT model to its compressed versions, which were created using different compression techniques, such as quantization and pruning.

The experiments revealed that the compressed BERT models did not simply scale down the behavior of the larger model. Instead, the compressed models exhibited unique characteristics that were not present in the original BERT model. For example, the compressed models showed differences in attention patterns, token representations, and task-specific performance.

The researchers also found that the choice of compression method had a significant impact on the characteristics of the compressed model. Different compression techniques led to different changes in the model's behavior, suggesting that the relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts is not straightforward.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the nature of model compression, but it also acknowledges some limitations and areas for further research. For instance, the study focused on a single model (BERT) and a limited set of compression techniques. It would be interesting to see if the findings hold true for other language models and a wider range of compression methods.

Additionally, the paper does not delve deeply into the practical implications of these findings. While it highlights the importance of understanding the characteristics of compressed models, more research is needed to understand how these insights can be leveraged to improve model design, deployment, and optimization.

Further research could also explore the relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts in more detail, investigating the underlying mechanisms that drive the observed differences in behavior.

Conclusion

This paper challenges the common assumption that compressed models are simply miniature versions of their larger counterparts. Through a detailed examination of the BERT language model, the researchers have shown that compressed models exhibit unique characteristics that set them apart from their larger counterparts.

These findings have important implications for the design, deployment, and understanding of machine learning models, especially in scenarios where model size and efficiency are critical factors. By recognizing the nuanced relationship between compressed models and their larger counterparts, researchers and practitioners can develop more informed strategies for model optimization and deployment, ultimately leading to more robust and effective machine learning solutions.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🌿

Compressed models are NOT miniature versions of large models

Rohit Raj Rai, Rishant Pal, Amit Awekar

Large neural models are often compressed before deployment. Model compression is necessary for many practical reasons, such as inference latency, memory footprint, and energy consumption. Compressed models are assumed to be miniature versions of corresponding large neural models. However, we question this belief in our work. We compare compressed models with corresponding large neural models using four model characteristics: prediction errors, data representation, data distribution, and vulnerability to adversarial attack. We perform experiments using the BERT-large model and its five compressed versions. For all four model characteristics, compressed models significantly differ from the BERT-large model. Even among compressed models, they differ from each other on all four model characteristics. Apart from the expected loss in model performance, there are major side effects of using compressed models to replace large neural models.

7/19/2024

Comprehensive Study on Performance Evaluation and Optimization of Model Compression: Bridging Traditional Deep Learning and Large Language Models

Aayush Saxena, Arit Kumar Bishwas, Ayush Ashok Mishra, Ryan Armstrong

Deep learning models have achieved tremendous success in most of the industries in recent years. The evolution of these models has also led to an increase in the model size and energy requirement, making it difficult to deploy in production on low compute devices. An increase in the number of connected devices around the world warrants compressed models that can be easily deployed at the local devices with low compute capacity and power accessibility. A wide range of solutions have been proposed by different researchers to reduce the size and complexity of such models, prominent among them are, Weight Quantization, Parameter Pruning, Network Pruning, low-rank representation, weights sharing, neural architecture search, knowledge distillation etc. In this research work, we investigate the performance impacts on various trained deep learning models, compressed using quantization and pruning techniques. We implemented both, quantization and pruning, compression techniques on popular deep learning models used in the image classification, object detection, language models and generative models-based problem statements. We also explored performance of various large language models (LLMs) after quantization and low rank adaptation. We used the standard evaluation metrics (model's size, accuracy, and inference time) for all the related problem statements and concluded this paper by discussing the challenges and future work.

7/24/2024

What Happens When Small Is Made Smaller? Exploring the Impact of Compression on Small Data Pretrained Language Models

Busayo Awobade, Mardiyyah Oduwole, Steven Kolawole

Compression techniques have been crucial in advancing machine learning by enabling efficient training and deployment of large-scale language models. However, these techniques have received limited attention in the context of low-resource language models, which are trained on even smaller amounts of data and under computational constraints, a scenario known as the low-resource double-bind. This paper investigates the effectiveness of pruning, knowledge distillation, and quantization on an exclusively low-resourced, small-data language model, AfriBERTa. Through a battery of experiments, we assess the effects of compression on performance across several metrics beyond accuracy. Our study provides evidence that compression techniques significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of small-data language models, confirming that the prevailing beliefs regarding the effects of compression on large, heavily parameterized models hold true for less-parameterized, small-data models.

4/9/2024

📈

Lossless and Near-Lossless Compression for Foundation Models

Moshik Hershcovitch, Leshem Choshen, Andrew Wood, Ilias Enmouri, Peter Chin, Swaminathan Sundararaman, Danny Harnik

With the growth of model sizes and scale of their deployment, their sheer size burdens the infrastructure requiring more network and more storage to accommodate these. While there is a vast literature about reducing model sizes, we investigate a more traditional type of compression -- one that compresses the model to a smaller form and is coupled with a decompression algorithm that returns it to its original size -- namely lossless compression. Somewhat surprisingly, we show that such lossless compression can gain significant network and storage reduction on popular models, at times reducing over $50%$ of the model size. We investigate the source of model compressibility, introduce compression variants tailored for models and categorize models to compressibility groups. We also introduce a tunable lossy compression technique that can further reduce size even on the less compressible models with little to no effect on the model accuracy. We estimate that these methods could save over an ExaByte per month of network traffic downloaded from a large model hub like HuggingFace.

4/24/2024