Confidence-aware Contrastive Learning for Selective Classification
2406.04745
0
0
Abstract
Selective classification enables models to make predictions only when they are sufficiently confident, aiming to enhance safety and reliability, which is important in high-stakes scenarios. Previous methods mainly use deep neural networks and focus on modifying the architecture of classification layers to enable the model to estimate the confidence of its prediction. This work provides a generalization bound for selective classification, disclosing that optimizing feature layers helps improve the performance of selective classification. Inspired by this theory, we propose to explicitly improve the selective classification model at the feature level for the first time, leading to a novel Confidence-aware Contrastive Learning method for Selective Classification, CCL-SC, which similarizes the features of homogeneous instances and differentiates the features of heterogeneous instances, with the strength controlled by the model's confidence. The experimental results on typical datasets, i.e., CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, CelebA, and ImageNet, show that CCL-SC achieves significantly lower selective risk than state-of-the-art methods, across almost all coverage degrees. Moreover, it can be combined with existing methods to bring further improvement.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a confidence-aware contrastive learning approach for selective classification tasks, where the model is trained to be both accurate and confident in its predictions.
- The key idea is to leverage the model's confidence during training to focus on samples with high prediction confidence, which can lead to better generalization and calibration.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets and show that it outperforms state-of-the-art selective classification methods.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to train machine learning models for selective classification tasks. In these tasks, the model not only needs to make accurate predictions, but also needs to be confident about its predictions. The authors' approach focuses on training the model to be confident in the predictions it is most sure about, rather than trying to make predictions for everything.
This is achieved through a technique called "confidence-aware contrastive learning." The model is trained to learn features that can distinguish between samples it is confident about and samples it is not confident about. By focusing on the confident samples during training, the model can learn to generalize better and provide more reliable predictions.
The researchers show that this approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods for selective classification on several benchmark datasets. This suggests that considering the model's confidence during training can lead to more robust and trustworthy machine learning systems, which is an important consideration for real-world applications.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new method called "Confidence-aware Contrastive Learning for Selective Classification" (CCSC). The key idea is to leverage the model's confidence during training to focus on samples with high prediction confidence, which can lead to better generalization and calibration.
The authors propose a two-stage training process. First, they train the model using a standard cross-entropy loss to learn discriminative features. Then, they introduce a confidence-aware contrastive loss that encourages the model to learn features that can distinguish between confident and non-confident samples.
Specifically, the contrastive loss compares the feature representations of confident samples (i.e., samples with high prediction confidence) and non-confident samples (i.e., samples with low prediction confidence). The model is trained to pull the representations of confident samples closer together and push the representations of non-confident samples further apart.
The authors evaluate their approach on several benchmark datasets for selective classification, including CIFAR-100, ImbalanceCIFAR-100, and TinyImageNet. They show that CCSC outperforms state-of-the-art selective classification methods in terms of both accuracy and confidence calibration.
Critical Analysis
The authors have addressed an important problem in machine learning, as building trustworthy and reliable models is crucial for many real-world applications. By focusing on the model's confidence during training, the CCSC approach can lead to better generalization and calibration, which are desirable properties for selective classification tasks.
However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed method. For example, it is not clear how CCSC would perform in the presence of significant distribution shifts or under other challenging scenarios. Additionally, the computational overhead of the two-stage training process and the contrastive loss computation is not analyzed.
Further research could explore the robustness of CCSC to different types of distribution shifts, as well as its applicability to other selective classification settings, such as clinical applications or long-tailed distributions. Additionally, investigating more efficient ways to incorporate confidence information during training could be a promising direction.
Conclusion
The "Confidence-aware Contrastive Learning for Selective Classification" paper presents an innovative approach to training machine learning models for selective classification tasks. By leveraging the model's confidence during training, the proposed method can lead to better generalization and calibration, which are crucial for building trustworthy and reliable machine learning systems.
The authors' empirical results on benchmark datasets are promising and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach. While the paper does not discuss potential limitations, the core idea of incorporating confidence information during training is a valuable contribution to the field of selective classification. Further research exploring the robustness and practical applications of this method could yield important insights and advancements in this area.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Hierarchical Selective Classification
Shani Goren, Ido Galil, Ran El-Yaniv
0
0
Deploying deep neural networks for risk-sensitive tasks necessitates an uncertainty estimation mechanism. This paper introduces hierarchical selective classification, extending selective classification to a hierarchical setting. Our approach leverages the inherent structure of class relationships, enabling models to reduce the specificity of their predictions when faced with uncertainty. In this paper, we first formalize hierarchical risk and coverage, and introduce hierarchical risk-coverage curves. Next, we develop algorithms for hierarchical selective classification (which we refer to as inference rules), and propose an efficient algorithm that guarantees a target accuracy constraint with high probability. Lastly, we conduct extensive empirical studies on over a thousand ImageNet classifiers, revealing that training regimes such as CLIP, pretraining on ImageNet21k and knowledge distillation boost hierarchical selective performance.
5/21/2024
🏷️
Calibrated Selective Classification
Adam Fisch, Tommi Jaakkola, Regina Barzilay
0
0
Selective classification allows models to abstain from making predictions (e.g., say I don't know) when in doubt in order to obtain better effective accuracy. While typical selective models can be effective at producing more accurate predictions on average, they may still allow for wrong predictions that have high confidence, or skip correct predictions that have low confidence. Providing calibrated uncertainty estimates alongside predictions -- probabilities that correspond to true frequencies -- can be as important as having predictions that are simply accurate on average. However, uncertainty estimates can be unreliable for certain inputs. In this paper, we develop a new approach to selective classification in which we propose a method for rejecting examples with uncertain uncertainties. By doing so, we aim to make predictions with {well-calibrated} uncertainty estimates over the distribution of accepted examples, a property we call selective calibration. We present a framework for learning selectively calibrated models, where a separate selector network is trained to improve the selective calibration error of a given base model. In particular, our work focuses on achieving robust calibration, where the model is intentionally designed to be tested on out-of-domain data. We achieve this through a training strategy inspired by distributionally robust optimization, in which we apply simulated input perturbations to the known, in-domain training data. We demonstrate the empirical effectiveness of our approach on multiple image classification and lung cancer risk assessment tasks.
6/24/2024
🏷️
Selective Classification Under Distribution Shifts
Hengyue Liang, Le Peng, Ju Sun
0
0
In selective classification (SC), a classifier abstains from making predictions that are likely to be wrong to avoid excessive errors. To deploy imperfect classifiers -- imperfect either due to intrinsic statistical noise of data or for robustness issue of the classifier or beyond -- in high-stakes scenarios, SC appears to be an attractive and necessary path to follow. Despite decades of research in SC, most previous SC methods still focus on the ideal statistical setting only, i.e., the data distribution at deployment is the same as that of training, although practical data can come from the wild. To bridge this gap, in this paper, we propose an SC framework that takes into account distribution shifts, termed generalized selective classification, that covers label-shifted (or out-of-distribution) and covariate-shifted samples, in addition to typical in-distribution samples, the first of its kind in the SC literature. We focus on non-training-based confidence-score functions for generalized SC on deep learning (DL) classifiers and propose two novel margin-based score functions. Through extensive analysis and experiments, we show that our proposed score functions are more effective and reliable than the existing ones for generalized SC on a variety of classification tasks and DL classifiers.
5/9/2024
Bayesian Learning-driven Prototypical Contrastive Loss for Class-Incremental Learning
Nisha L. Raichur, Lucas Heublein, Tobias Feigl, Alexander Rugamer, Christopher Mutschler, Felix Ott
0
0
The primary objective of methods in continual learning is to learn tasks in a sequential manner over time from a stream of data, while mitigating the detrimental phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we focus on learning an optimal representation between previous class prototypes and newly encountered ones. We propose a prototypical network with a Bayesian learning-driven contrastive loss (BLCL) tailored specifically for class-incremental learning scenarios. Therefore, we introduce a contrastive loss that incorporates new classes into the latent representation by reducing the intra-class distance and increasing the inter-class distance. Our approach dynamically adapts the balance between the cross-entropy and contrastive loss functions with a Bayesian learning technique. Empirical evaluations conducted on both the CIFAR-10 dataset for image classification and images of a GNSS-based dataset for interference classification validate the efficacy of our method, showcasing its superiority over existing state-of-the-art approaches.
5/21/2024