Conformal prediction for frequency-severity modeling

Overview

• This paper presents a model-agnostic framework for constructing prediction intervals for insurance claims.
• The framework extends the technique of split conformal prediction to two-stage frequency-severity modeling.
• The effectiveness of the framework is demonstrated using simulated and real-world datasets, with both classical parametric models and modern machine learning methods.
• When the severity model is a random forest, the authors show how the out-of-bag mechanism can be used to eliminate the need for a calibration set in the conformal procedure.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a new way to create prediction intervals for insurance claims. Prediction intervals are a range of values that are likely to contain the actual insurance claim amount. This is important for insurers to estimate their financial risks accurately.

The authors' framework builds on a technique called "split conformal prediction," which provides statistical guarantees about the accuracy of the prediction intervals. The researchers extend this technique to work with two-stage models, which first estimate the likelihood of a claim occurring (frequency) and then the potential claim amount (severity).

The researchers test their framework using both simulated data and real-world insurance datasets. They show that it works well with both traditional statistical models and more advanced machine learning methods, like random forests.

When using random forests for the severity model, the authors found a clever way to eliminate the need for a separate "calibration" dataset, which is typically required for conformal prediction. This makes the framework more practical to apply in real-world settings.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a model-agnostic framework for constructing prediction intervals of insurance claims, extending the split conformal prediction technique to two-stage frequency-severity modeling.

The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of the framework using both simulated and real-world insurance datasets, comparing classical parametric models and contemporary machine learning methods like random forests. When the severity model is a random forest, they show how the out-of-bag mechanism can be leveraged to eliminate the need for a calibration set in the conformal procedure, streamlining the application of the framework.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a rigorous and well-designed framework for constructing prediction intervals for insurance claims. The authors address the practical challenge of eliminating the need for a calibration set when using random forests, which is a valuable contribution.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed framework. For example, it would be helpful to understand how the framework might perform in the presence of data contamination or other real-world complexities that could affect the validity of the prediction intervals.

Additionally, the paper focuses solely on the insurance domain, and it would be interesting to see if the framework could be extended to other domains where two-stage modeling is relevant.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel and practical framework for constructing prediction intervals for insurance claims, with strong statistical guarantees. The authors' innovative approach to eliminating the need for a calibration set when using random forests as the severity model is a valuable contribution to the field.

While the paper does not address potential limitations, the framework appears to be a promising tool for insurance companies and researchers looking to improve the accuracy and reliability of their claim predictions. Further research exploring the framework's applicability to other domains could help expand its impact and reach.