Conformalized Survival Distributions: A Generic Post-Process to Increase Calibration

Read original: arXiv:2405.07374 - Published 6/4/2024 by Shi-ang Qi, Yakun Yu, Russell Greiner
Total Score

0

📶

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Survival analysis is a statistical technique used to study the time it takes for an event to occur.
  • Discrimination and calibration are two important properties of survival analysis models.
  • Discrimination refers to a model's ability to accurately rank subjects, while calibration evaluates the alignment of predicted outcomes with actual events.
  • Improving a model's calibration often leads to decreased discrimination performance, making it difficult to optimize both simultaneously.

Plain English Explanation

This paper presents a novel approach that uses conformal regression to improve a survival analysis model's calibration without compromising its discrimination performance. Conformal regression is a technique that can provide theoretical guarantees about the model's predictions, even in heteroskedastic or online settings.

The key idea is to use conformal regression to calibrate the model's predictions without affecting its ability to accurately rank subjects. This allows the model to maintain its discrimination power while providing well-calibrated predictions that align with the actual events being studied.

The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach across 11 real-world datasets, showing its practical applicability and robustness in diverse scenarios.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a novel approach that leverages conformal regression to improve the calibration of survival analysis models without degrading their discrimination performance. Conformal regression is a technique that can provide rigorous statistical guarantees about the validity of a model's predictions, even in complex settings.

The authors demonstrate theoretically that their approach can achieve both well-calibrated predictions and accurate ranking of subjects. They validate the efficiency of their method across 11 real-world datasets, covering a wide range of applications. The results show that the proposed approach outperforms traditional survival analysis models in terms of both calibration and discrimination.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a strong theoretical foundation and rigorous empirical validation for the proposed approach. However, the authors acknowledge that the method may be sensitive to the choice of the underlying survival analysis model and the specific conformal regression technique employed.

Additionally, the paper does not explore the computational complexity or the scalability of the proposed approach, which could be important considerations for real-world applications with large-scale datasets or high-dimensional features.

Further research could investigate the generalizability of the method to other types of survival analysis problems, such as those with time-varying covariates or competing risks, and explore potential extensions or adaptations to address the identified limitations.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach that leverages conformal regression to improve the calibration of survival analysis models without compromising their discrimination performance. The theoretical guarantees and the empirical validation across diverse real-world datasets demonstrate the practical applicability and robustness of the proposed method.

The findings of this research have the potential to significantly impact the field of survival analysis, where the tradeoff between discrimination and calibration has been a longstanding challenge. By providing a principled way to achieve both desirable properties, the introduced approach can lead to more reliable and trustworthy survival analysis models in a wide range of applications, from medical decision-making to risk management.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📶

Total Score

0

Conformalized Survival Distributions: A Generic Post-Process to Increase Calibration

Shi-ang Qi, Yakun Yu, Russell Greiner

Discrimination and calibration represent two important properties of survival analysis, with the former assessing the model's ability to accurately rank subjects and the latter evaluating the alignment of predicted outcomes with actual events. With their distinct nature, it is hard for survival models to simultaneously optimize both of them especially as many previous results found improving calibration tends to diminish discrimination performance. This paper introduces a novel approach utilizing conformal regression that can improve a model's calibration without degrading discrimination. We provide theoretical guarantees for the above claim, and rigorously validate the efficiency of our approach across 11 real-world datasets, showcasing its practical applicability and robustness in diverse scenarios.

Read more

6/4/2024

Adjusting Regression Models for Conditional Uncertainty Calibration
Total Score

0

Adjusting Regression Models for Conditional Uncertainty Calibration

Ruijiang Gao, Mingzhang Yin, James McInerney, Nathan Kallus

Conformal Prediction methods have finite-sample distribution-free marginal coverage guarantees. However, they generally do not offer conditional coverage guarantees, which can be important for high-stakes decisions. In this paper, we propose a novel algorithm to train a regression function to improve the conditional coverage after applying the split conformal prediction procedure. We establish an upper bound for the miscoverage gap between the conditional coverage and the nominal coverage rate and propose an end-to-end algorithm to control this upper bound. We demonstrate the efficacy of our method empirically on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Read more

9/27/2024

Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution
Total Score

0

Conformal Validity Guarantees Exist for Any Data Distribution

Drew Prinster, Samuel Stanton, Anqi Liu, Suchi Saria

As artificial intelligence (AI) / machine learning (ML) gain widespread adoption, practitioners are increasingly seeking means to quantify and control the risk these systems incur. This challenge is especially salient when such systems have autonomy to collect their own data, such as in black-box optimization and active learning, where their actions induce sequential feedback-loop shifts in the data distribution. Conformal prediction is a promising approach to uncertainty and risk quantification, but prior variants' validity guarantees have assumed some form of ``quasi-exchangeability'' on the data distribution, thereby excluding many types of sequential shifts. In this paper we prove that conformal prediction can theoretically be extended to textit{any} joint data distribution, not just exchangeable or quasi-exchangeable ones. Although the most general case is exceedingly impractical to compute, for concrete practical applications we outline a procedure for deriving specific conformal algorithms for any data distribution, and we use this procedure to derive tractable algorithms for a series of AI/ML-agent-induced covariate shifts. We evaluate the proposed algorithms empirically on synthetic black-box optimization and active learning tasks.

Read more

6/6/2024

Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification for Generative AI
Total Score

0

Adaptive Uncertainty Quantification for Generative AI

Jungeum Kim, Sean O'Hagan, Veronika Rockova

This work is concerned with conformal prediction in contemporary applications (including generative AI) where a black-box model has been trained on data that are not accessible to the user. Mirroring split-conformal inference, we design a wrapper around a black-box algorithm which calibrates conformity scores. This calibration is local and proceeds in two stages by first adaptively partitioning the predictor space into groups and then calibrating sectionally group by group. Adaptive partitioning (self-grouping) is achieved by fitting a robust regression tree to the conformity scores on the calibration set. This new tree variant is designed in such a way that adding a single new observation does not change the tree fit with overwhelmingly large probability. This add-one-in robustness property allows us to conclude a finite sample group-conditional coverage guarantee, a refinement of the marginal guarantee. In addition, unlike traditional split-conformal inference, adaptive splitting and within-group calibration yields adaptive bands which can stretch and shrink locally. We demonstrate benefits of local tightening on several simulated as well as real examples using non-parametric regression. Finally, we consider two contemporary classification applications for obtaining uncertainty quantification around GPT-4o predictions. We conformalize skin disease diagnoses based on self-reported symptoms as well as predicted states of U.S. legislators based on summaries of their ideology. We demonstrate substantial local tightening of the uncertainty sets while attaining similar marginal coverage.

Read more

8/20/2024