Living in the Moment: Can Large Language Models Grasp Co-Temporal Reasoning?
2406.09072
0
0
Abstract
Temporal reasoning is fundamental for large language models (LLMs) to comprehend the world. Current temporal reasoning datasets are limited to questions about single or isolated events, falling short in mirroring the realistic temporal characteristics involving concurrent nature and intricate temporal interconnections. In this paper, we introduce CoTempQA, a comprehensive co-temporal Question Answering (QA) benchmark containing four co-temporal scenarios (Equal, Overlap, During, Mix) with 4,748 samples for evaluating the co-temporal comprehension and reasoning abilities of LLMs. Our extensive experiments reveal a significant gap between the performance of current LLMs and human-level reasoning on CoTempQA tasks. Even when enhanced with Chain of Thought (CoT) methodologies, models consistently struggle with our task. In our preliminary exploration, we discovered that mathematical reasoning plays a significant role in handling co-temporal events and proposed a strategy to boost LLMs' co-temporal reasoning from a mathematical perspective. We hope that our CoTempQA datasets will encourage further advancements in improving the co-temporal reasoning capabilities of LLMs. Our code is available at https://github.com/zhaochen0110/Cotempqa.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the ability of large language models (LLMs) to grasp co-temporal reasoning, which involves understanding the temporal relationships between events.
- The researchers introduce the CoTempQA dataset, a benchmark for evaluating LLMs' temporal reasoning capabilities.
- They investigate how well various LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and PaLM, perform on the CoTempQA dataset.
Plain English Explanation
The paper investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can understand the temporal relationships between events, a skill known as co-temporal reasoning. The researchers developed the CoTempQA dataset, which contains questions that test an LLM's ability to reason about the timing of different events. They then evaluated the performance of several popular LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and PaLM, on this dataset. The goal was to see how well these models can grasp the temporal aspects of language and understand when events occur relative to one another.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces the CoTempQA dataset, a new benchmark for evaluating LLMs' temporal reasoning capabilities. The dataset consists of multiple-choice questions that test an LLM's understanding of the temporal relationships between events described in natural language. The researchers then evaluate the performance of various LLMs, including GPT-3, InstructGPT, and PaLM, on the CoTempQA dataset. They analyze the models' performance on different types of temporal reasoning questions and investigate the factors that contribute to their success or failure.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the field of natural language understanding by highlighting the challenges that LLMs face in grasping co-temporal reasoning. While these models have shown impressive capabilities in various language tasks, the results from the CoTempQA dataset suggest that they still struggle with fully understanding the temporal aspects of language. The researchers acknowledge that further research is needed to develop more robust temporal reasoning capabilities in LLMs, as this skill is crucial for many real-world applications, such as question answering and language understanding.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the current limitations of large language models in understanding the temporal relationships between events, a crucial skill for many real-world applications. The introduction of the CoTempQA dataset provides a valuable benchmark for evaluating and improving LLMs' temporal reasoning capabilities. The findings of this research suggest that while LLMs have made significant advancements in language understanding, there is still work to be done to help them grasp the temporal aspects of language and fully comprehend the co-temporal nature of events.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Large Language Models Can Learn Temporal Reasoning
Siheng Xiong, Ali Payani, Ramana Kompella, Faramarz Fekri
0
0
While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning capabilities, they are not without their flaws and inaccuracies. Recent studies have introduced various methods to mitigate these limitations. Temporal reasoning (TR), in particular, presents a significant challenge for LLMs due to its reliance on diverse temporal concepts and intricate temporal logic. In this paper, we propose TG-LLM, a novel framework towards language-based TR. Instead of reasoning over the original context, we adopt a latent representation, temporal graph (TG) that enhances the learning of TR. A synthetic dataset (TGQA), which is fully controllable and requires minimal supervision, is constructed for fine-tuning LLMs on this text-to-TG translation task. We confirmed in experiments that the capability of TG translation learned on our dataset can be transferred to other TR tasks and benchmarks. On top of that, we teach LLM to perform deliberate reasoning over the TGs via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) bootstrapping and graph data augmentation. We observed that those strategies, which maintain a balance between usefulness and diversity, bring more reliable CoTs and final results than the vanilla CoT distillation.
6/12/2024
Timo: Towards Better Temporal Reasoning for Language Models
Zhaochen Su, Jun Zhang, Tong Zhu, Xiaoye Qu, Juntao Li, Min Zhang, Yu Cheng
0
0
Reasoning about time is essential for Large Language Models (LLMs) to understand the world. Previous works focus on solving specific tasks, primarily on time-sensitive question answering. While these methods have proven effective, they cannot generalize to a wider spectrum of temporal reasoning tasks. Therefore, we propose a crucial question: Can we build a universal framework to handle a variety of temporal reasoning tasks? To that end, we systematically study 38 temporal reasoning tasks. Based on the observation that 19 tasks are directly related to mathematics, we first leverage the available mathematical dataset to set a solid foundation for temporal reasoning. However, the in-depth study indicates that focusing solely on mathematical enhancement falls short of addressing pure temporal reasoning tasks. To mitigate this limitation, we propose a simple but effective self-critic temporal optimization method to enhance the model's temporal reasoning capabilities without sacrificing general task abilities. Finally, we develop Timo, a model designed to excel in temporal reasoning at the 7B and 13B scales. Notably, Timo outperforms the counterpart LLMs by 10.0 and 7.6 in average accuracy scores and achieves the new state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance of comparable size. Extensive experiments further validate our framework's effectiveness and its generalization across diverse temporal tasks. The code is available at https://github.com/zhaochen0110/Timo.
6/21/2024
Test of Time: A Benchmark for Evaluating LLMs on Temporal Reasoning
Bahare Fatemi, Mehran Kazemi, Anton Tsitsulin, Karishma Malkan, Jinyeong Yim, John Palowitch, Sungyong Seo, Jonathan Halcrow, Bryan Perozzi
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable reasoning capabilities, yet they remain susceptible to errors, particularly in temporal reasoning tasks involving complex temporal logic. Existing research has explored LLM performance on temporal reasoning using diverse datasets and benchmarks. However, these studies often rely on real-world data that LLMs may have encountered during pre-training or employ anonymization techniques that can inadvertently introduce factual inconsistencies. In this work, we address these limitations by introducing novel synthetic datasets specifically designed to assess LLM temporal reasoning abilities in various scenarios. The diversity of question types across these datasets enables systematic investigation into the impact of the problem structure, size, question type, fact order, and other factors on LLM performance. Our findings provide valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current LLMs in temporal reasoning tasks. To foster further research in this area, we are open-sourcing the datasets and evaluation framework used in our experiments: https://huggingface.co/datasets/baharef/ToT.
6/14/2024
New!STBench: Assessing the Ability of Large Language Models in Spatio-Temporal Analysis
Wenbin Li, Di Yao, Ruibo Zhao, Wenjie Chen, Zijie Xu, Chengxue Luo, Chang Gong, Quanliang Jing, Haining Tan, Jingping Bi
0
0
The rapid evolution of large language models (LLMs) holds promise for reforming the methodology of spatio-temporal data mining. However, current works for evaluating the spatio-temporal understanding capability of LLMs are somewhat limited and biased. These works either fail to incorporate the latest language models or only focus on assessing the memorized spatio-temporal knowledge. To address this gap, this paper dissects LLMs' capability of spatio-temporal data into four distinct dimensions: knowledge comprehension, spatio-temporal reasoning, accurate computation, and downstream applications. We curate several natural language question-answer tasks for each category and build the benchmark dataset, namely STBench, containing 13 distinct tasks and over 60,000 QA pairs. Moreover, we have assessed the capabilities of 13 LLMs, such as GPT-4o, Gemma and Mistral. Experimental results reveal that existing LLMs show remarkable performance on knowledge comprehension and spatio-temporal reasoning tasks, with potential for further enhancement on other tasks through in-context learning, chain-of-though prompting, and fine-tuning. The code and datasets of STBench are released on https://github.com/LwbXc/STBench.
6/28/2024