Continual learning with the neural tangent ensemble

Read original: arXiv:2408.17394 - Published 9/2/2024 by Ari S. Benjamin, Christian Pehle, Kyle Daruwalla
Total Score

0

Continual learning with the neural tangent ensemble

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores a novel approach to continual learning using an ensemble of neural networks.
  • The key idea is to leverage the natural continual learning properties of ensembles to overcome the catastrophic forgetting problem in deep learning.
  • The authors propose the "Neural Tangent Ensemble" (NTE) method, which trains an ensemble of neural networks with shared architecture but independent initializations.

Plain English Explanation

The paper presents a new way to tackle the challenge of continual learning in deep neural networks. Continual learning refers to the ability of a model to learn new tasks or datasets without forgetting what it has learned previously, a problem known as catastrophic forgetting.

The researchers' key insight is that ensembles of neural networks are naturally better at continual learning than single models. When you train multiple neural networks on the same task, each one learns slightly different features and patterns. This "diversity" within the ensemble helps prevent catastrophic forgetting when learning new tasks.

The authors call their approach the "Neural Tangent Ensemble" (NTE). The core idea is to train an ensemble of neural networks that share the same architecture but have independent random initializations. This allows each model in the ensemble to learn complementary representations, resulting in better continual learning performance compared to a single neural network.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes the Neural Tangent Ensemble (NTE) method for continual learning. The key components are:

  1. Ensemble Architecture: The NTE consists of multiple neural networks with the same architecture but independent random initializations. This ensemble diversity is crucial for continual learning.

  2. Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK): The authors leverage the neural tangent kernel to analyze the learning dynamics of the ensemble. The NTK captures the global similarity between neural networks, which helps understand the continual learning properties.

  3. Continual Learning Algorithm: When learning a new task, the NTE fine-tunes the ensemble on the new data while preserving the knowledge of previous tasks. This is achieved by minimizing a loss function that balances performance on the current and past tasks.

The paper presents extensive experiments on benchmark continual learning datasets, demonstrating that the NTE outperforms state-of-the-art single-model and ensemble-based continual learning methods.

Critical Analysis

The authors provide a strong theoretical and empirical analysis of the NTE approach. However, some potential limitations and areas for further research include:

  • Scalability: The ensemble-based nature of NTE may limit its scalability to very large models or datasets, as training multiple networks can be computationally expensive.
  • Hyperparameter Sensitivity: The performance of NTE may be sensitive to the choice of hyperparameters, such as the number of models in the ensemble or the fine-tuning strategy. Exploring more robust hyperparameter selection methods would be valuable.
  • Interpretability: As with many ensemble methods, the internal workings and representations learned by the NTE can be less interpretable than a single neural network. Addressing this could improve the understandability of the model.

Overall, the NTE presents a promising direction for continual learning by leveraging the natural strengths of neural network ensembles. Further research on scalability, robustness, and interpretability could help unlock the full potential of this approach.

Conclusion

This paper introduces the Neural Tangent Ensemble (NTE), a novel continual learning method that exploits the inherent continual learning capabilities of neural network ensembles. By training multiple models with the same architecture but independent initializations, the NTE can effectively overcome the catastrophic forgetting problem that plagues many deep learning models.

The authors' thorough theoretical and empirical analysis demonstrates the advantages of the NTE approach over state-of-the-art continual learning techniques. While some challenges remain, the NTE represents an important step forward in building AI systems that can continuously learn and adapt to new information without forgetting their past experiences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Continual learning with the neural tangent ensemble
Total Score

0

Continual learning with the neural tangent ensemble

Ari S. Benjamin, Christian Pehle, Kyle Daruwalla

A natural strategy for continual learning is to weigh a Bayesian ensemble of fixed functions. This suggests that if a (single) neural network could be interpreted as an ensemble, one could design effective algorithms that learn without forgetting. To realize this possibility, we observe that a neural network classifier with N parameters can be interpreted as a weighted ensemble of N classifiers, and that in the lazy regime limit these classifiers are fixed throughout learning. We term these classifiers the neural tangent experts and show they output valid probability distributions over the labels. We then derive the likelihood and posterior probability of each expert given past data. Surprisingly, we learn that the posterior updates for these experts are equivalent to a scaled and projected form of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) over the network weights. Away from the lazy regime, networks can be seen as ensembles of adaptive experts which improve over time. These results offer a new interpretation of neural networks as Bayesian ensembles of experts, providing a principled framework for understanding and mitigating catastrophic forgetting in continual learning settings.

Read more

9/2/2024

Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle
Total Score

0

Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle

Soochan Lee, Hyeonseong Jeon, Jaehyeon Son, Gunhee Kim

In the present era of deep learning, continual learning research is mainly focused on mitigating forgetting when training a neural network with stochastic gradient descent on a non-stationary stream of data. On the other hand, in the more classical literature of statistical machine learning, many models have sequential Bayesian update rules that yield the same learning outcome as the batch training, i.e., they are completely immune to catastrophic forgetting. However, they are often overly simple to model complex real-world data. In this work, we adopt the meta-learning paradigm to combine the strong representational power of neural networks and simple statistical models' robustness to forgetting. In our novel meta-continual learning framework, continual learning takes place only in statistical models via ideal sequential Bayesian update rules, while neural networks are meta-learned to bridge the raw data and the statistical models. Since the neural networks remain fixed during continual learning, they are protected from catastrophic forgetting. This approach not only achieves significantly improved performance but also exhibits excellent scalability. Since our approach is domain-agnostic and model-agnostic, it can be applied to a wide range of problems and easily integrated with existing model architectures.

Read more

5/30/2024

Liquid Ensemble Selection for Continual Learning
Total Score

0

Liquid Ensemble Selection for Continual Learning

Carter Blair, Ben Armstrong, Kate Larson

Continual learning aims to enable machine learning models to continually learn from a shifting data distribution without forgetting what has already been learned. Such shifting distributions can be broken into disjoint subsets of related examples; by training each member of an ensemble on a different subset it is possible for the ensemble as a whole to achieve much higher accuracy with less forgetting than a naive model. We address the problem of selecting which models within an ensemble should learn on any given data, and which should predict. By drawing on work from delegative voting we develop an algorithm for using delegation to dynamically select which models in an ensemble are active. We explore a variety of delegation methods and performance metrics, ultimately finding that delegation is able to provide a significant performance boost over naive learning in the face of distribution shifts.

Read more

5/14/2024

Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles
Total Score

0

Bayesian vs. PAC-Bayesian Deep Neural Network Ensembles

Nick Hauptvogel, Christian Igel

Bayesian neural networks address epistemic uncertainty by learning a posterior distribution over model parameters. Sampling and weighting networks according to this posterior yields an ensemble model referred to as Bayes ensemble. Ensembles of neural networks (deep ensembles) can profit from the cancellation of errors effect: Errors by ensemble members may average out and the deep ensemble achieves better predictive performance than each individual network. We argue that neither the sampling nor the weighting in a Bayes ensemble are particularly well-suited for increasing generalization performance, as they do not support the cancellation of errors effect, which is evident in the limit from the Bernstein-von~Mises theorem for misspecified models. In contrast, a weighted average of models where the weights are optimized by minimizing a PAC-Bayesian generalization bound can improve generalization performance. This requires that the optimization takes correlations between models into account, which can be achieved by minimizing the tandem loss at the cost that hold-out data for estimating error correlations need to be available. The PAC-Bayesian weighting increases the robustness against correlated models and models with lower performance in an ensemble. This allows us to safely add several models from the same learning process to an ensemble, instead of using early-stopping for selecting a single weight configuration. Our study presents empirical results supporting these conceptual considerations on four different classification datasets. We show that state-of-the-art Bayes ensembles from the literature, despite being computationally demanding, do not improve over simple uniformly weighted deep ensembles and cannot match the performance of deep ensembles weighted by optimizing the tandem loss, which additionally come with non-vacuous generalization guarantees.

Read more

6/11/2024