Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration

Read original: arXiv:2310.00280 - Published 8/22/2024 by Qiushi Sun, Zhangyue Yin, Xiang Li, Zhiyong Wu, Xipeng Qiu, Lingpeng Kong
Total Score

0

👁️

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in natural language processing, but their performance in complex reasoning tasks is still limited by their internal representations.
  • The paper introduces Corex, a suite of novel strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents that collaborate to solve complex tasks.
  • Corex is inspired by human behaviors and includes collaboration paradigms like Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes to enhance the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process.
  • The paper demonstrates that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work together yields substantially better performance on various reasoning tasks compared to existing methods.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. They have become very good at tasks like answering questions, summarizing documents, and even generating creative writing. However, when it comes to more complex reasoning tasks, like solving math problems or making logical deductions, their performance is still limited.

The researchers who wrote this paper wanted to find a way to improve the reasoning abilities of LLMs. They were inspired by how humans often collaborate and discuss ideas to arrive at better solutions. So, they developed a set of strategies called Corex that allows multiple LLMs to work together on a task.

The Corex system includes different "modes" of collaboration, like Debate, where the LLMs argue different sides of an issue, and Review, where they critique each other's work. By working together in this way, the LLMs can come up with more accurate and reliable solutions, overcoming the limitations of their individual knowledge and reasoning abilities.

The researchers tested Corex on a variety of complex reasoning tasks, and they found that the collaborative approach significantly outperformed existing methods that rely on a single LLM. This suggests that coordinating multiple AI models could be a powerful way to tackle challenging problems that require advanced reasoning.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Corex, a suite of novel strategies that transform large language models (LLMs) into autonomous agents that collaborate to solve complex tasks. Corex is inspired by human behaviors and includes diverse collaboration paradigms such as Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes.

The Debate mode allows LLMs to argue different sides of an issue, fostering critical thinking and challenging their own biases. The Review mode enables LLMs to critique each other's work, promoting factuality and faithfulness in the reasoning process. The Retrieve mode allows LLMs to access external information sources to supplement their knowledge.

Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, the researchers demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. The collaborative approach helps the LLMs overcome hallucinations and provide more reliable solutions.

The paper also analyzes the cost-effectiveness of the Corex approach, showing that it facilitates efficient collaboration among different LLMs and promotes annotation efficiency, making it a promising strategy for enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the reasoning abilities of large language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.

One potential concern is the scalability of the Corex system, as coordinating multiple LLMs may become computationally expensive as the task complexity increases. The researchers mention the need to explore more efficient ways of managing the collaboration process.

Additionally, the paper focuses on a limited set of reasoning tasks, and it would be valuable to see the Corex system tested on a wider range of complex problems, including those that require more specialized domain knowledge or longer-term reasoning.

Another area for further exploration is the interpretability and transparency of the Corex-based reasoning process. While the collaborative approach yields better results, it may be harder to understand and explain the underlying decision-making compared to a single, more straightforward LLM.

Despite these caveats, the Corex approach represents a promising step forward in enhancing the reasoning capabilities of large language models, and the researchers' focus on collaboration and multi-model coordination is a valuable contribution to the field of artificial intelligence.

Conclusion

This paper introduces Corex, a suite of novel strategies that transform large language models (LLMs) into autonomous agents that collaborate to solve complex reasoning tasks. By incorporating diverse collaboration paradigms inspired by human behaviors, Corex enables LLMs to overcome their limitations in internal representations and provide more reliable and factual solutions.

The researchers' extensive experiments demonstrate the substantial performance improvements achieved by orchestrating multiple LLMs to work together, compared to existing methods that rely on a single model. This collaborative approach not only enhances the reasoning capabilities of LLMs but also promotes cost-effectiveness and annotation efficiency, making it a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to push the boundaries of natural language understanding and reasoning.

As the field of large language models continues to evolve, the Corex system and its underlying principles of multi-model coordination and task-agnostic collaboration offer a promising direction for further research and development, with the potential to unlock new frontiers in artificial intelligence.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

👁️

Total Score

0

Corex: Pushing the Boundaries of Complex Reasoning through Multi-Model Collaboration

Qiushi Sun, Zhangyue Yin, Xiang Li, Zhiyong Wu, Xipeng Qiu, Lingpeng Kong

Large Language Models (LLMs) are evolving at an unprecedented pace and have exhibited considerable capability in the realm of natural language processing (NLP) with world knowledge. Benefiting from ultra-large-scale training corpora, a single LLM can manage typical NLP tasks competently. However, its performance in executing reasoning tasks is still confined by the limitations of its internal representations. To push this boundary further, we introduce Corex in this paper, a suite of novel general-purpose strategies that transform LLMs into autonomous agents pioneering multi-model collaborations for complex task-solving. Inspired by human behaviors, Corex is constituted by diverse collaboration paradigms including Debate, Review, and Retrieve modes, which collectively work towards enhancing the factuality, faithfulness, and reliability of the reasoning process. These paradigms foster task-agnostic approaches that enable LLMs to ''think outside the box,'' thereby overcoming hallucinations and providing better solutions. Through extensive experiments across four different types of reasoning tasks, we demonstrate that orchestrating multiple LLMs to work in concert yields substantially better performance compared to existing methods. Further results and in-depth analysis demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of our method, facilitating collaboration among different LLMs and promoting annotation efficiency.

Read more

8/22/2024

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge
Total Score

0

CLR-Fact: Evaluating the Complex Logical Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models over Factual Knowledge

Tianshi Zheng, Jiaxin Bai, Yicheng Wang, Tianqing Fang, Yue Guo, Yauwai Yim, Yangqiu Song

While large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities across various natural language processing tasks by acquiring rich factual knowledge from their broad training data, their ability to synthesize and logically reason with this knowledge in complex ways remains underexplored. In this work, we present a systematic evaluation of state-of-the-art LLMs' complex logical reasoning abilities through a novel benchmark of automatically generated complex reasoning questions over general domain and biomedical knowledge graphs. Our extensive experiments, employing diverse in-context learning techniques, reveal that LLMs excel at reasoning over general world knowledge but face significant challenges with specialized domain-specific knowledge. We find that prompting with explicit Chain-of-Thought demonstrations can substantially improve LLM performance on complex logical reasoning tasks with diverse logical operations. Interestingly, our controlled evaluations uncover an asymmetry where LLMs display proficiency at set union operations, but struggle considerably with set intersections - a key building block of logical reasoning. To foster further work, we will publicly release our evaluation benchmark and code.

Read more

7/31/2024

Caught in the Quicksand of Reasoning, Far from AGI Summit: Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions
Total Score

0

Caught in the Quicksand of Reasoning, Far from AGI Summit: Evaluating LLMs' Mathematical and Coding Competency through Ontology-guided Interventions

Pengfei Hong, Navonil Majumder, Deepanway Ghosal, Somak Aditya, Rada Mihalcea, Soujanya Poria

Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased striking results on existing logical reasoning benchmarks, with some models even surpassing human performance. However, the true depth of their competencies and robustness in reasoning tasks remains an open question. To this end, in this paper, we focus on two popular reasoning tasks: arithmetic reasoning and code generation. Particularly, we introduce: (i) a general ontology of perturbations for maths and coding questions, (ii) a semi-automatic method to apply these perturbations, and (iii) two datasets, MORE and CORE, respectively, of perturbed maths and coding problems to probe the limits of LLM capabilities in numeric reasoning and coding tasks. Through comprehensive evaluations of both closed-source and open-source LLMs, we show a significant performance drop across all the models against the perturbed questions, suggesting that the current LLMs lack robust problem solving skills and structured reasoning abilities in many areas, as defined by our ontology. We open source the datasets and source codes at: https://github.com/declare-lab/llm_robustness.

Read more

6/28/2024

Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey
Total Score

0

Beyond Accuracy: Evaluating the Reasoning Behavior of Large Language Models -- A Survey

Philipp Mondorf, Barbara Plank

Large language models (LLMs) have recently shown impressive performance on tasks involving reasoning, leading to a lively debate on whether these models possess reasoning capabilities similar to humans. However, despite these successes, the depth of LLMs' reasoning abilities remains uncertain. This uncertainty partly stems from the predominant focus on task performance, measured through shallow accuracy metrics, rather than a thorough investigation of the models' reasoning behavior. This paper seeks to address this gap by providing a comprehensive review of studies that go beyond task accuracy, offering deeper insights into the models' reasoning processes. Furthermore, we survey prevalent methodologies to evaluate the reasoning behavior of LLMs, emphasizing current trends and efforts towards more nuanced reasoning analyses. Our review suggests that LLMs tend to rely on surface-level patterns and correlations in their training data, rather than on sophisticated reasoning abilities. Additionally, we identify the need for further research that delineates the key differences between human and LLM-based reasoning. Through this survey, we aim to shed light on the complex reasoning processes within LLMs.

Read more

8/7/2024