CoSy: Evaluating Textual Explanations of Neurons
2405.20331
0
0
Abstract
A crucial aspect of understanding the complex nature of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) is the ability to explain learned concepts within their latent representations. While various methods exist to connect neurons to textual descriptions of human-understandable concepts, evaluating the quality of these explanation methods presents a major challenge in the field due to a lack of unified, general-purpose quantitative evaluation. In this work, we introduce CoSy (Concept Synthesis) -- a novel, architecture-agnostic framework to evaluate the quality of textual explanations for latent neurons. Given textual explanations, our proposed framework leverages a generative model conditioned on textual input to create data points representing the textual explanation. Then, the neuron's response to these explanation data points is compared with the response to control data points, providing a quality estimate of the given explanation. We ensure the reliability of our proposed framework in a series of meta-evaluation experiments and demonstrate practical value through insights from benchmarking various concept-based textual explanation methods for Computer Vision tasks, showing that tested explanation methods significantly differ in quality.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces CoSy, a framework for evaluating textual explanations of neuron activations in deep neural networks.
- CoSy aims to assess the coherence, specificity, and understandability of these textual explanations, which can help users better understand the reasoning behind model predictions.
- The paper presents a set of metrics and human evaluation protocols to quantify the quality of textual explanations, and demonstrates the framework on several state-of-the-art neuron explanation models.
Plain English Explanation
Deep neural networks are powerful machine learning models that can achieve impressive performance on a variety of tasks. However, these models can be complex and opaque, making it difficult for humans to understand how they arrive at their predictions. To address this, researchers have developed techniques to generate textual explanations that describe the reasoning behind a neural network's activations.
The CoSy framework provides a way to evaluate the quality of these textual explanations. It looks at three key aspects: coherence (how well the explanation flows and makes sense), specificity (how detailed and relevant the explanation is), and understandability (how easy the explanation is for a human to comprehend). By measuring these qualities, CoSy can help determine whether the textual explanations are truly useful for understanding the inner workings of a neural network.
The paper demonstrates the CoSy framework on several state-of-the-art neuron explanation models, such as CoProNN and LESS. This allows the researchers to compare the strengths and weaknesses of different explanation techniques and identify areas for improvement.
Overall, the CoSy framework is a valuable tool for making neural networks more transparent and interpretable. By providing a systematic way to evaluate textual explanations, it can help bridge the gap between the complex inner workings of deep learning models and the human understanding of those models.
Technical Explanation
The CoSy framework presented in this paper aims to evaluate the quality of textual explanations for neuron activations in deep neural networks. The authors propose three key metrics to assess these explanations:
- Coherence: This measures how well the textual explanation flows and forms a cohesive narrative, rather than just a list of disconnected concepts.
- Specificity: This assesses how detailed and relevant the explanation is, capturing the nuances of the specific neuron activation being described.
- Understandability: This evaluates how easy the explanation is for a human to comprehend, without requiring specialized technical knowledge.
To implement these metrics, the authors develop a set of human evaluation protocols, where annotators are asked to rate textual explanations along these dimensions. They also explore automatic metrics that can be used to approximate the human evaluations.
The paper demonstrates the CoSy framework on several state-of-the-art neuron explanation models, including CoProNN, which uses prototypical concepts to explain activations, and LESS, which aims to discover concise network explanations. The authors find that these models have varying strengths and weaknesses when it comes to the coherence, specificity, and understandability of their textual explanations.
Additionally, the paper explores the relationship between the quality of textual explanations and the underlying concept-based explanations used to generate them. This suggests that improving the concept-level understanding of neural networks may be key to producing more effective textual explanations.
Critical Analysis
The CoSy framework presented in this paper is a valuable contribution to the field of interpretable AI, as it provides a structured way to evaluate the quality of textual explanations for neural network activations. By focusing on coherence, specificity, and understandability, the framework helps ensure that these explanations are not just technically accurate, but also meaningful and accessible to human users.
One potential limitation of the CoSy approach is that it relies heavily on human evaluation, which can be time-consuming and potentially subject to bias. The authors do explore automatic metrics as a way to approximate the human evaluations, but more work may be needed to fully automate the evaluation process.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on textual explanations, but there may be other modes of explanation (e.g., visual, interactive) that could be equally or more effective for certain applications. Future research could explore how the CoSy framework could be adapted to evaluate these alternative explanation modalities.
Finally, while the paper demonstrates the CoSy framework on several state-of-the-art neuron explanation models, it would be valuable to see the framework applied to a wider range of techniques, including those that leverage concept-based explanations or other novel approaches to interpretability. This could help further validate the usefulness of the CoSy framework and identify areas for improvement.
Conclusion
The CoSy framework introduced in this paper is a significant step forward in the quest to make deep neural networks more transparent and interpretable. By providing a systematic way to evaluate the quality of textual explanations for neuron activations, CoSy can help researchers and practitioners develop more effective and user-friendly explanation techniques.
The key insights and contributions of this work include the identification of coherence, specificity, and understandability as critical dimensions of explanation quality, the development of human evaluation protocols and automatic metrics to assess these dimensions, and the demonstration of the CoSy framework on several state-of-the-art neuron explanation models.
As AI systems become increasingly ubiquitous and influential in our lives, the ability to understand and trust their decision-making processes will only grow in importance. The CoSy framework represents an important step towards bridging the gap between the complex inner workings of deep learning and the human understanding of these powerful models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
LLM-assisted Concept Discovery: Automatically Identifying and Explaining Neuron Functions
Nhat Hoang-Xuan, Minh Vu, My T. Thai
0
0
Providing textual concept-based explanations for neurons in deep neural networks (DNNs) is of importance in understanding how a DNN model works. Prior works have associated concepts with neurons based on examples of concepts or a pre-defined set of concepts, thus limiting possible explanations to what the user expects, especially in discovering new concepts. Furthermore, defining the set of concepts requires manual work from the user, either by directly specifying them or collecting examples. To overcome these, we propose to leverage multimodal large language models for automatic and open-ended concept discovery. We show that, without a restricted set of pre-defined concepts, our method gives rise to novel interpretable concepts that are more faithful to the model's behavior. To quantify this, we validate each concept by generating examples and counterexamples and evaluating the neuron's response on this new set of images. Collectively, our method can discover concepts and simultaneously validate them, providing a credible automated tool to explain deep neural networks.
6/14/2024
From Neural Activations to Concepts: A Survey on Explaining Concepts in Neural Networks
Jae Hee Lee, Sergio Lanza, Stefan Wermter
0
0
In this paper, we review recent approaches for explaining concepts in neural networks. Concepts can act as a natural link between learning and reasoning: once the concepts are identified that a neural learning system uses, one can integrate those concepts with a reasoning system for inference or use a reasoning system to act upon them to improve or enhance the learning system. On the other hand, knowledge can not only be extracted from neural networks but concept knowledge can also be inserted into neural network architectures. Since integrating learning and reasoning is at the core of neuro-symbolic AI, the insights gained from this survey can serve as an important step towards realizing neuro-symbolic AI based on explainable concepts.
5/6/2024
👀
CoProNN: Concept-based Prototypical Nearest Neighbors for Explaining Vision Models
Teodor Chiaburu, Frank Hau{ss}er, Felix Bie{ss}mann
0
0
Mounting evidence in explainability for artificial intelligence (XAI) research suggests that good explanations should be tailored to individual tasks and should relate to concepts relevant to the task. However, building task specific explanations is time consuming and requires domain expertise which can be difficult to integrate into generic XAI methods. A promising approach towards designing useful task specific explanations with domain experts is based on compositionality of semantic concepts. Here, we present a novel approach that enables domain experts to quickly create concept-based explanations for computer vision tasks intuitively via natural language. Leveraging recent progress in deep generative methods we propose to generate visual concept-based prototypes via text-to-image methods. These prototypes are then used to explain predictions of computer vision models via a simple k-Nearest-Neighbors routine. The modular design of CoProNN is simple to implement, it is straightforward to adapt to novel tasks and allows for replacing the classification and text-to-image models as more powerful models are released. The approach can be evaluated offline against the ground-truth of predefined prototypes that can be easily communicated also to domain experts as they are based on visual concepts. We show that our strategy competes very well with other concept-based XAI approaches on coarse grained image classification tasks and may even outperform those methods on more demanding fine grained tasks. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method for human-machine collaboration settings in qualitative and quantitative user studies. All code and experimental data can be found in our GitHub $href{https://github.com/TeodorChiaburu/beexplainable}{repository}$.
4/24/2024
Less is More: Discovering Concise Network Explanations
Neehar Kondapaneni, Markus Marks, Oisin MacAodha, Pietro Perona
0
0
We introduce Discovering Conceptual Network Explanations (DCNE), a new approach for generating human-comprehensible visual explanations to enhance the interpretability of deep neural image classifiers. Our method automatically finds visual explanations that are critical for discriminating between classes. This is achieved by simultaneously optimizing three criteria: the explanations should be few, diverse, and human-interpretable. Our approach builds on the recently introduced Concept Relevance Propagation (CRP) explainability method. While CRP is effective at describing individual neuronal activations, it generates too many concepts, which impacts human comprehension. Instead, DCNE selects the few most important explanations. We introduce a new evaluation dataset centered on the challenging task of classifying birds, enabling us to compare the alignment of DCNE's explanations to those of human expert-defined ones. Compared to existing eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methods, DCNE has a desirable trade-off between conciseness and completeness when summarizing network explanations. It produces 1/30 of CRP's explanations while only resulting in a slight reduction in explanation quality. DCNE represents a step forward in making neural network decisions accessible and interpretable to humans, providing a valuable tool for both researchers and practitioners in XAI and model alignment.
6/17/2024