Credal Learning Theory
2402.00957
0
0
Abstract
Statistical learning theory is the foundation of machine learning, providing theoretical bounds for the risk of models learnt from a (single) training set, assumed to issue from an unknown probability distribution. In actual deployment, however, the data distribution may (and often does) vary, causing domain adaptation/generalization issues. In this paper we lay the foundations for a `credal' theory of learning, using convex sets of probabilities (credal sets) to model the variability in the data-generating distribution. Such credal sets, we argue, may be inferred from a finite sample of training sets. Bounds are derived for the case of finite hypotheses spaces (both assuming realizability or not) as well as infinite model spaces, which directly generalize classical results.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Introduces a new "credal learning theory" for modeling uncertainty in machine learning models
- Proposes a framework for representing and reasoning about uncertain knowledge using credal sets
- Demonstrates the potential benefits of this approach through theoretical analysis and empirical experiments
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new approach called "credal learning theory" for dealing with uncertainty in machine learning models. Traditionally, machine learning models provide a single "best guess" for predictions or classifications. However, in many real-world situations, there may be inherent uncertainty or ambiguity that is not captured by a single point estimate.
The credal learning theory framework allows the model to express uncertainty by representing its beliefs as a set of possible probability distributions, known as a "credal set," rather than a single distribution. This provides a more nuanced and flexible way to handle uncertain knowledge.
For example, imagine you have a machine learning model that is trying to classify whether an email is spam or not. With traditional methods, the model might say the email has a 70% chance of being spam. But with credal learning, the model could express that it believes the email has anywhere from a 60-80% chance of being spam, reflecting the inherent uncertainty in making that determination.
The paper demonstrates the potential benefits of this approach through mathematical analysis and experiments. It shows how credal sets can lead to more robust and reliable models that are better equipped to handle the uncertainty present in many real-world machine learning problems.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of credal learning theory is to represent the beliefs of a machine learning model not as a single probability distribution, but as a set of possible distributions known as a "credal set." This provides a more flexible way to capture and reason about uncertainty compared to traditional probabilistic models.
The authors propose a general framework for incorporating credal sets into the learning process. This involves defining appropriate loss functions and optimization procedures that can work with the credal set representation. They also analyze the theoretical properties of this approach, showing how it can lead to more robust and reliable models.
To demonstrate the practical benefits, the paper presents experiments on several machine learning tasks, including classification, regression, and reinforcement learning. The results indicate that credal learning can outperform traditional probabilistic models, particularly in settings with high levels of uncertainty or distributional shift.
The authors also discuss connections between credal learning and other related areas, such as robust continuous learning and causal reasoning. They suggest that the credal set representation could be a useful tool for building more generalizable and adaptable AI systems.
Critical Analysis
The credal learning theory presented in this paper offers a promising approach for dealing with uncertainty in machine learning. By representing beliefs as credal sets rather than single distributions, the framework can capture a more nuanced and realistic view of the model's knowledge and uncertainty.
One potential limitation is the increased computational complexity compared to traditional probabilistic models. Working with credal sets can require more sophisticated optimization and inference procedures, which may limit the scalability of the approach. The paper discusses some strategies for addressing this, but further research may be needed to improve the efficiency and practicality of credal learning.
Additionally, the paper focuses primarily on the theoretical and empirical aspects of credal learning, without delving deeply into the philosophical or cognitive science foundations. While the authors draw connections to related areas like causal reasoning and robust learning, a more extensive discussion of the cognitive plausibility and interpretability of the credal set representation could strengthen the framework.
Overall, the credal learning theory represents a compelling and well-executed contribution to the field of machine learning. It offers a novel way to handle uncertainty that could lead to more robust and reliable AI systems, particularly in domains with high levels of ambiguity or distributional shift. Further development and real-world applications of this approach will be an interesting area for future research.
Conclusion
The "credal learning theory" presented in this paper offers a new framework for representing and reasoning about uncertainty in machine learning models. By expressing beliefs as credal sets rather than single probability distributions, the approach provides a more flexible and nuanced way to handle the inherent ambiguity present in many real-world problems.
The paper demonstrates the potential benefits of this credal set representation through theoretical analysis and empirical experiments, showing how it can lead to more robust and reliable models. While the increased computational complexity poses some practical challenges, the authors suggest that credal learning could be a valuable tool for building more generalizable and adaptable AI systems, particularly in domains with high levels of uncertainty.
Overall, this work represents an interesting and well-executed contribution to the field of machine learning, with the credal learning theory offering a promising new direction for further research and development.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏋️
Towards a theory of out-of-distribution learning
Jayanta Dey, Ali Geisa, Ronak Mehta, Tyler M. Tomita, Hayden S. Helm, Haoyin Xu, Eric Eaton, Jeffery Dick, Carey E. Priebe, Joshua T. Vogelstein
0
0
Learning is a process wherein a learning agent enhances its performance through exposure of experience or data. Throughout this journey, the agent may encounter diverse learning environments. For example, data may be presented to the leaner all at once, in multiple batches, or sequentially. Furthermore, the distribution of each data sample could be either identical and independent (iid) or non-iid. Additionally, there may exist computational and space constraints for the deployment of the learning algorithms. The complexity of a learning task can vary significantly, depending on the learning setup and the constraints imposed upon it. However, it is worth noting that the current literature lacks formal definitions for many of the in-distribution and out-of-distribution learning paradigms. Establishing proper and universally agreed-upon definitions for these learning setups is essential for thoroughly exploring the evolution of ideas across different learning scenarios and deriving generalized mathematical bounds for these learners. In this paper, we aim to address this issue by proposing a chronological approach to defining different learning tasks using the provably approximately correct (PAC) learning framework. We will start with in-distribution learning and progress to recently proposed lifelong or continual learning. We employ consistent terminology and notation to demonstrate how each of these learning frameworks represents a specific instance of a broader, more generalized concept of learnability. Our hope is that this work will inspire a universally agreed-upon approach to quantifying different types of learning, fostering greater understanding and progress in the field.
6/10/2024
🤯
Valid Inference for Machine Learning Model Parameters
Neil Dey, Jonathan P. Williams
0
0
The parameters of a machine learning model are typically learned by minimizing a loss function on a set of training data. However, this can come with the risk of overtraining; in order for the model to generalize well, it is of great importance that we are able to find the optimal parameter for the model on the entire population -- not only on the given training sample. In this paper, we construct valid confidence sets for this optimal parameter of a machine learning model, which can be generated using only the training data without any knowledge of the population. We then show that studying the distribution of this confidence set allows us to assign a notion of confidence to arbitrary regions of the parameter space, and we demonstrate that this distribution can be well-approximated using bootstrapping techniques.
5/13/2024
General Distribution Learning: A theoretical framework for Deep Learning
Binchuan Qi, Li Li, Wei Gong
0
0
There remain numerous unanswered research questions on deep learning (DL) within the classical learning theory framework. These include the remarkable generalization capabilities of overparametrized neural networks (NNs), the efficient optimization performance despite non-convexity of objectives, the mechanism of flat minima for generalization, and the exceptional performance of deep architectures in solving physical problems. This paper introduces General Distribution Learning (GD Learning), a novel theoretical learning framework designed to address a comprehensive range of machine learning and statistical tasks, including classification, regression and parameter estimation. Departing from traditional statistical machine learning, GD Learning focuses on the true underlying distribution. In GD Learning, learning error, corresponding to the expected error in classical statistical learning framework, is divided into fitting errors due to models and algorithms, as well as sampling errors introduced by limited sampling data. The framework significantly incorporates prior knowledge, especially in scenarios characterized by data scarcity, thereby enhancing performance. Within the GD Learning framework, we demonstrate that the global optimal solutions in non-convex optimization can be approached by minimizing the gradient norm and the non-uniformity of the eigenvalues of the model's Jacobian matrix. This insight leads to the development of the gradient structure control algorithm. GD Learning also offers fresh insights into the questions on deep learning, including overparameterization and non-convex optimization, bias-variance trade-off, and the mechanism of flat minima.
6/27/2024
Credal Wrapper of Model Averaging for Uncertainty Estimation on Out-Of-Distribution Detection
Kaizheng Wang, Fabio Cuzzolin, Keivan Shariatmadar, David Moens, Hans Hallez
0
0
This paper presents an innovative approach, called credal wrapper, to formulating a credal set representation of model averaging for Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) and deep ensembles, capable of improving uncertainty estimation in classification tasks. Given a finite collection of single distributions derived from BNNs or deep ensembles, the proposed approach extracts an upper and a lower probability bound per class, acknowledging the epistemic uncertainty due to the availability of a limited amount of sampled predictive distributions. Such probability intervals over classes can be mapped on a convex set of probabilities (a 'credal set') from which, in turn, a unique prediction can be obtained using a transformation called 'intersection probability transformation'. In this article, we conduct extensive experiments on multiple out-of-distribution (OOD) detection benchmarks, encompassing various dataset pairs (CIFAR10/100 vs SVHN/Tiny-ImageNet, CIFAR10 vs CIFAR10-C, CIFAR100 vs CIFAR100-C and ImageNet vs ImageNet-O) and using different network architectures (such as VGG16, Res18/50, EfficientNet B2, and ViT Base). Compared to BNN and deep ensemble baselines, the proposed credal representation methodology exhibits superior performance in uncertainty estimation and achieves lower expected calibration error on OOD samples.
5/27/2024