A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a critical analysis of tokenwise reward-guided text generation, a technique used in large language models (LLMs) to align model outputs with desired attributes.
- The authors examine the limitations and potential issues with this approach, highlighting areas for improvement and further research.
- Key topics covered include the design of reward models, the impact of reward optimization on model behavior, and the broader challenges of aligning LLMs with specific objectives.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on an approach called "tokenwise reward-guided text generation" that is used in large language models (LLMs) to try to align the model's outputs with certain desired characteristics or attributes. The authors take a close look at this approach and identify some potential problems or limitations with it.
One of the main ideas is the use of a "reward model" that evaluates the generated text and provides a score or "reward" based on how well it matches the desired attributes. The model is then trained to maximize this reward, essentially guiding it to produce text that the reward model considers desirable.
However, the authors argue that this approach has some issues. For example, the reward model itself may have biases or flaws that get encoded into the language model. Additionally, the process of optimizing for the reward can lead the model to exhibit unintended behaviors, such as becoming overly focused on maximizing the reward rather than producing coherent, natural-sounding text.
The paper also discusses broader challenges in aligning LLMs with specific objectives, such as the difficulty of specifying exactly what we want the model to do and the potential for unintended consequences to arise. The authors suggest that more research is needed to address these challenges and develop more robust and reliable techniques for aligning LLMs with our goals.
Technical Explanation
The paper examines the approach of tokenwise reward-guided text generation, which is used in large language models (LLMs) to align model outputs with desired attributes. The authors highlight several potential limitations and issues with this technique.
One key aspect is the use of a reward model that evaluates the generated text and provides a score or "reward" based on how well it matches the desired attributes. The language model is then trained to maximize this reward, guiding it to produce text that the reward model considers desirable.
However, the authors argue that this approach can lead to several issues. For example, the reward model itself may have biases or flaws that get encoded into the language model. Additionally, the process of optimizing for the reward can cause the model to exhibit unintended behaviors, such as becoming overly focused on maximizing the reward rather than producing coherent, natural-sounding text.
The paper also discusses broader challenges in aligning LLMs with specific objectives, such as the difficulty of specifying exactly what we want the model to do and the potential for unintended consequences to arise. The authors suggest that more research is needed to address these challenges and develop more robust and reliable techniques for aligning LLMs with our goals.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises several valid concerns about the use of tokenwise reward-guided text generation in large language models. The authors highlight the potential for the reward model to introduce biases and the risk of the language model becoming overly focused on maximizing the reward rather than producing coherent, natural-sounding text.
These are important issues that deserve further exploration and research. The authors rightly point out that specifying the desired attributes and objectives for an LLM is a complex and challenging task, and that unintended consequences can arise even with careful design.
However, the paper does not provide a comprehensive solution or alternative approach to addressing these challenges. While the authors suggest that more research is needed, they do not offer concrete proposals for how to develop more robust and reliable techniques for aligning LLMs with our goals.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the specific experiments and analyses conducted, as well as the broader context and implications of the research. Providing more details and context would have strengthened the critical analysis and made it more accessible to a broader audience.
Conclusion
This paper offers a valuable critical examination of the use of tokenwise reward-guided text generation in large language models. The authors highlight important limitations and potential issues with this approach, including the risk of biases in the reward model and the unintended consequences of reward optimization.
The insights presented in this paper contribute to the ongoing dialogue around the challenges of aligning LLMs with our desired objectives. While the authors do not provide a comprehensive solution, they underscore the need for continued research and development in this area to address these complex challenges.
As the use of LLMs becomes increasingly widespread, it is crucial that we carefully consider the potential pitfalls and work to create more robust and reliable techniques for guiding these powerful models to behave in alignment with our goals and values. The issues raised in this paper provide a valuable starting point for further exploration and innovation in this important field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A Critical Look At Tokenwise Reward-Guided Text Generation
Ahmad Rashid, Ruotian Wu, Julia Grosse, Agustinus Kristiadi, Pascal Poupart
Large language models (LLMs) can significantly be improved by aligning to human preferences -- the so-called reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). However, the cost of fine-tuning an LLM is prohibitive for many users. Due to their ability to bypass LLM finetuning, tokenwise reward-guided text generation (RGTG) methods have recently been proposed. They use a reward model trained on full sequences to score partial sequences during a tokenwise decoding, in a bid to steer the generation towards sequences with high rewards. However, these methods have so far been only heuristically motivated and poorly analyzed. In this work, we show that reward models trained on full sequences are not compatible with scoring partial sequences. To alleviate this issue, we propose to explicitly train a Bradley-Terry reward model on partial sequences, and autoregressively sample from the implied tokenwise policy during decoding time. We study the property of this reward model and the implied policy. In particular, we show that this policy is proportional to the ratio of two distinct RLHF policies. We show that our simple approach outperforms previous RGTG methods and achieves similar performance as strong offline baselines but without large-scale LLM finetuning.
Read more6/13/2024
0
ReMoDetect: Reward Models Recognize Aligned LLM's Generations
Hyunseok Lee, Jihoon Tack, Jinwoo Shin
The remarkable capabilities and easy accessibility of large language models (LLMs) have significantly increased societal risks (e.g., fake news generation), necessitating the development of LLM-generated text (LGT) detection methods for safe usage. However, detecting LGTs is challenging due to the vast number of LLMs, making it impractical to account for each LLM individually; hence, it is crucial to identify the common characteristics shared by these models. In this paper, we draw attention to a common feature of recent powerful LLMs, namely the alignment training, i.e., training LLMs to generate human-preferable texts. Our key finding is that as these aligned LLMs are trained to maximize the human preferences, they generate texts with higher estimated preferences even than human-written texts; thus, such texts are easily detected by using the reward model (i.e., an LLM trained to model human preference distribution). Based on this finding, we propose two training schemes to further improve the detection ability of the reward model, namely (i) continual preference fine-tuning to make the reward model prefer aligned LGTs even further and (ii) reward modeling of Human/LLM mixed texts (a rephrased texts from human-written texts using aligned LLMs), which serves as a median preference text corpus between LGTs and human-written texts to learn the decision boundary better. We provide an extensive evaluation by considering six text domains across twelve aligned LLMs, where our method demonstrates state-of-the-art results. Code is available at https://github.com/hyunseoklee-ai/reward_llm_detect.
Read more5/28/2024
0
Aligning Large Language Models via Fine-grained Supervision
Dehong Xu, Liang Qiu, Minseok Kim, Faisal Ladhak, Jaeyoung Do
Pre-trained large-scale language models (LLMs) excel at producing coherent articles, yet their outputs may be untruthful, toxic, or fail to align with user expectations. Current approaches focus on using reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) to improve model alignment, which works by transforming coarse human preferences of LLM outputs into a feedback signal that guides the model learning process. However, because this approach operates on sequence-level feedback, it lacks the precision to identify the exact parts of the output affecting user preferences. To address this gap, we propose a method to enhance LLM alignment through fine-grained token-level supervision. Specifically, we ask annotators to minimally edit less preferred responses within the standard reward modeling dataset to make them more favorable, ensuring changes are made only where necessary while retaining most of the original content. The refined dataset is used to train a token-level reward model, which is then used for training our fine-grained Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) model. Our experiment results demonstrate that this approach can achieve up to an absolute improvement of $5.1%$ in LLM performance, in terms of win rate against the reference model, compared with the traditional PPO model.
Read more6/6/2024
0
TLCR: Token-Level Continuous Reward for Fine-grained Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Eunseop Yoon, Hee Suk Yoon, SooHwan Eom, Gunsoo Han, Daniel Wontae Nam, Daejin Jo, Kyoung-Woon On, Mark A. Hasegawa-Johnson, Sungwoong Kim, Chang D. Yoo
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) leverages human preference data to train language models to align more closely with human essence. These human preference data, however, are labeled at the sequence level, creating a mismatch between sequence-level preference labels and tokens, which are autoregressively generated from the language model. Although several recent approaches have tried to provide token-level (i.e., dense) rewards for each individual token, these typically rely on predefined discrete reward values (e.g., positive: +1, negative: -1, neutral: 0), failing to account for varying degrees of preference inherent to each token. To address this limitation, we introduce TLCR (Token-Level Continuous Reward) for RLHF, which incorporates a discriminator trained to distinguish positive and negative tokens, and the confidence of the discriminator is used to assign continuous rewards to each token considering the context. Extensive experiments show that our proposed TLCR leads to consistent performance improvements over previous sequence-level or token-level discrete rewards on open-ended generation benchmarks.
Read more7/24/2024