Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
2309.08952
0
0
š¬
Abstract
Knowledge editing aims to change language models' performance on several special cases (i.e., editing scope) by infusing the corresponding expected knowledge into them. With the recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), knowledge editing has been shown as a promising technique to adapt LLMs to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. However, most of the previous studies neglect the multi-lingual nature of some main-stream LLMs (e.g., LLaMA, ChatGPT and GPT-4), and typically focus on monolingual scenarios, where LLMs are edited and evaluated in the same language. As a result, it is still unknown the effect of source language editing on a different target language. In this paper, we aim to figure out this cross-lingual effect in knowledge editing. Specifically, we first collect a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset by translating ZsRE from English to Chinese. Then, we conduct English editing on various knowledge editing methods covering different paradigms, and evaluate their performance in Chinese, and vice versa. To give deeper analyses of the cross-lingual effect, the evaluation includes four aspects, i.e., reliability, generality, locality and portability. Furthermore, we analyze the inconsistent behaviors of the edited models and discuss their specific challenges. Data and codes are available at https://github.com/krystalan/Bi_ZsRE
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the cross-lingual effects of knowledge editing on large language models (LLMs).
- Knowledge editing aims to update LLMs with new information without retraining from scratch.
- Most previous studies have focused on monolingual scenarios, neglecting the multilingual nature of popular LLMs like LLaMA, ChatGPT, and GPT-4.
- The paper investigates how editing an LLM in one language affects its performance in a different target language.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and ChatGPT are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, these models can sometimes make mistakes or lack certain knowledge.
Knowledge editing is a technique that allows researchers to update an LLM's knowledge without having to retrain the entire model from scratch. This can be useful for adapting the model to new information or fixing specific issues.
Most previous studies on knowledge editing have focused on editing the models in a single language, like English. But many popular LLMs, like LLaMA and GPT-4, are actually multilingual, meaning they can understand and generate text in multiple languages.
This paper explores what happens when you edit an LLM in one language (like English) and then see how it performs in a different language (like Chinese). The researchers wanted to understand the "cross-lingual" effects of knowledge editing - how does editing in one language impact the model's abilities in another language?
To do this, the researchers first created a large dataset of English-to-Chinese translations, which they used to test the edited models. They then applied various knowledge editing techniques to the models in English and evaluated the results in Chinese, and vice versa.
Technical Explanation
The researchers first collected a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset by translating the ZsRE (Zero-shot Relation Extraction) dataset from English to Chinese. This allowed them to test the cross-lingual effects of knowledge editing.
They then applied several different knowledge editing methods to various LLMs, including techniques that cover different paradigms like instruction-based and event-level approaches.
After editing the models in English, the researchers evaluated their performance on the Chinese dataset, and vice versa. This allowed them to analyze the cross-lingual effects across four key aspects:
- Reliability: How consistent are the edited models' outputs across languages?
- Generality: How well do the edited models generalize to new, unseen examples?
- Locality: How localized are the effects of the editing, i.e., do they only impact the specific knowledge that was edited?
- Portability: How well do the editing techniques transfer between languages?
The paper provides a detailed analysis of the inconsistent behaviors observed in the edited models and discusses the specific challenges involved in achieving reliable cross-lingual knowledge editing.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for future work:
- The study focuses on a single language pair (English-Chinese), and the findings may not generalize to other language combinations.
- The synthetic dataset used for evaluation may not fully capture the complexity of real-world cross-lingual knowledge transfer.
- The analysis is limited to specific knowledge editing techniques and tasks; the cross-lingual effects may differ for other methods or applications.
Additionally, the paper does not address potential bias or fairness issues that could arise from cross-lingual knowledge editing. For example, if the editing process introduces disparities in model performance across languages, it could lead to unfair outcomes for certain user groups.
Further research is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind the cross-lingual effects observed in this study and to develop more robust and equitable knowledge editing techniques for multilingual LLMs.
Conclusion
This paper makes an important contribution to the field of knowledge editing for large language models by exploring the cross-lingual effects of this technique. The findings suggest that the source language used for editing can significantly impact the model's performance in a different target language, highlighting the need for a more comprehensive understanding of multilingual knowledge editing.
The insights from this research can inform the development of more effective and reliable knowledge editing methods for LLMs, ultimately leading to models that are better adapted to the diverse needs of users across different languages and cultural contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š¬
EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models
Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuansheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, Huajun Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) usually suffer from knowledge cutoff or fallacy issues, which means they are unaware of unseen events or generate text with incorrect facts owing to outdated/noisy data. To this end, many knowledge editing approaches for LLMs have emerged -- aiming to subtly inject/edit updated knowledge or adjust undesired behavior while minimizing the impact on unrelated inputs. Nevertheless, due to significant differences among various knowledge editing methods and the variations in task setups, there is no standard implementation framework available for the community, which hinders practitioners from applying knowledge editing to applications. To address these issues, we propose EasyEdit, an easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for LLMs. It supports various cutting-edge knowledge editing approaches and can be readily applied to many well-known LLMs such as T5, GPT-J, LlaMA, etc. Empirically, we report the knowledge editing results on LlaMA-2 with EasyEdit, demonstrating that knowledge editing surpasses traditional fine-tuning in terms of reliability and generalization. We have released the source code on GitHub, along with Google Colab tutorials and comprehensive documentation for beginners to get started. Besides, we present an online system for real-time knowledge editing, and a demo video.
6/26/2024
MLaKE: Multilingual Knowledge Editing Benchmark for Large Language Models
Zihao Wei, Jingcheng Deng, Liang Pang, Hanxing Ding, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
0
0
The extensive utilization of large language models (LLMs) underscores the crucial necessity for precise and contemporary knowledge embedded within their intrinsic parameters. Existing research on knowledge editing primarily concentrates on monolingual scenarios, neglecting the complexities presented by multilingual contexts and multi-hop reasoning. To address these challenges, our study introduces MLaKE (Multilingual Language Knowledge Editing), a novel benchmark comprising 4072 multi-hop and 5360 single-hop questions designed to evaluate the adaptability of knowledge editing methods across five languages: English, Chinese, Japanese, French, and German. MLaKE aggregates fact chains from Wikipedia across languages and utilizes LLMs to generate questions in both free-form and multiple-choice. We evaluate the multilingual knowledge editing generalization capabilities of existing methods on MLaKE. Existing knowledge editing methods demonstrate higher success rates in English samples compared to other languages. However, their generalization capabilities are limited in multi-language experiments. Notably, existing knowledge editing methods often show relatively high generalization for languages within the same language family compared to languages from different language families. These results underscore the imperative need for advancements in multilingual knowledge editing and we hope MLaKE can serve as a valuable resource for benchmarking and solution development.
4/9/2024
Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
Cheng-Hsun Hsueh, Paul Kuo-Ming Huang, Tzu-Han Lin, Che-Wei Liao, Hung-Chieh Fang, Chao-Wei Huang, Yun-Nung Chen
0
0
Knowledge editing is a rising technique for efficiently updating factual knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) with minimal alteration of parameters. However, recent studies have identified concerning side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing. This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified view of the challenges associated with knowledge editing in LLMs. We discuss related works and summarize potential research directions to overcome these limitations. Our work highlights the limitations of current knowledge editing methods, emphasizing the need for deeper understanding of inner knowledge structures of LLMs and improved knowledge editing methods. To foster future research, we have released the complementary materials such as paper collection publicly at https://github.com/MiuLab/EditLLM-Survey
6/4/2024
Unveiling the Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
Zhoubo Li, Ningyu Zhang, Yunzhi Yao, Mengru Wang, Xi Chen, Huajun Chen
0
0
As the cost associated with fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) continues to rise, recent research efforts have pivoted towards developing methodologies to edit implicit knowledge embedded within LLMs. Yet, there's still a dark cloud lingering overhead -- will knowledge editing trigger butterfly effect? since it is still unclear whether knowledge editing might introduce side effects that pose potential risks or not. This paper pioneers the investigation into the potential pitfalls associated with knowledge editing for LLMs. To achieve this, we introduce new benchmark datasets and propose innovative evaluation metrics. Our results underline two pivotal concerns: (1) Knowledge Conflict: Editing groups of facts that logically clash can magnify the inherent inconsistencies in LLMs-a facet neglected by previous methods. (2) Knowledge Distortion: Altering parameters with the aim of editing factual knowledge can irrevocably warp the innate knowledge structure of LLMs. Experimental results vividly demonstrate that knowledge editing might inadvertently cast a shadow of unintended consequences on LLMs, which warrant attention and efforts for future works. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zjunlp/PitfallsKnowledgeEditing.
5/14/2024