Editing the Mind of Giants: An In-Depth Exploration of Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
2406.01436
0
0
Abstract
Knowledge editing is a rising technique for efficiently updating factual knowledge in Large Language Models (LLMs) with minimal alteration of parameters. However, recent studies have identified concerning side effects, such as knowledge distortion and the deterioration of general abilities, that have emerged after editing. This survey presents a comprehensive study of these side effects, providing a unified view of the challenges associated with knowledge editing in LLMs. We discuss related works and summarize potential research directions to overcome these limitations. Our work highlights the limitations of current knowledge editing methods, emphasizing the need for deeper understanding of inner knowledge structures of LLMs and improved knowledge editing methods. To foster future research, we have released the complementary materials such as paper collection publicly at https://github.com/MiuLab/EditLLM-Survey
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores the challenges and pitfalls of knowledge editing in large language models (LLMs)
- It examines how editing the knowledge and capabilities of these powerful AI systems can lead to unintended consequences
- The research highlights the complexity and difficulty of safely and effectively modifying the "minds" of these AI giants
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on the difficulties of trying to change or "edit" the knowledge and capabilities of large language models (LLMs) - the advanced AI systems that can generate human-like text. These LLMs are essentially the "minds" of AI, with an incredibly broad and deep understanding of the world.
However, the researchers found that editing these models' knowledge is extremely challenging and can lead to unexpected and potentially harmful outcomes. Even small changes can have ripple effects that are hard to predict, as the LLM's understanding is so interconnected and complex.
The researchers use analogies to explain this - for example, just as it's difficult to change one part of a giant, intricate machine without disrupting the whole system, editing an LLM's knowledge is like trying to surgically modify the brain of a highly intelligent being. There are many pitfalls and unintended consequences that can arise.
The paper explores different approaches to knowledge editing, such as cross-lingual knowledge editing, instruction-based knowledge editing, and event-level knowledge editing. It highlights the challenges and limitations of each method, underscoring the inherent difficulty of safely and effectively modifying these complex AI systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper provides an in-depth analysis of the challenges and pitfalls involved in attempting to edit the knowledge and capabilities of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are highly sophisticated AI systems with an incredibly broad and deep understanding of language, knowledge, and reasoning.
The researchers examine different approaches to knowledge editing, such as cross-lingual knowledge editing, which aims to transfer knowledge across languages, and instruction-based knowledge editing, which uses natural language instructions to modify an LLM's knowledge. They also explore event-level knowledge editing, which focuses on modifying the LLM's understanding of specific events or scenarios.
The experiments and analysis reveal the immense complexity and interconnectedness of the knowledge encoded in LLMs. Even seemingly small changes can have far-reaching and unpredictable consequences, as the models' understanding is so deeply integrated. The researchers liken this to the difficulty of surgically modifying a highly complex and interconnected system, such as the human brain.
The paper also discusses the challenges of detoxifying large language models through knowledge editing, as harmful biases and behaviors can be deeply embedded within the models.
Overall, the research highlights the fundamental difficulties and risks involved in attempting to edit the "minds" of these AI giants, underscoring the need for a deeper understanding of these systems and the development of more robust and reliable knowledge editing techniques.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a compelling and well-researched exploration of the challenges and pitfalls associated with knowledge editing in large language models (LLMs). The researchers effectively use analogies and examples to illustrate the inherent complexity and interconnectedness of these AI systems, which makes editing their knowledge an immensely difficult and risky endeavor.
One potential limitation of the research is the lack of concrete solutions or recommendations for overcoming the challenges identified. While the paper does explore different knowledge editing approaches, such as cross-lingual, instruction-based, and event-level editing, it primarily focuses on highlighting the difficulties and risks of these methods, without offering clear pathways for addressing them.
Additionally, the paper could have delved deeper into the potential societal implications of the issues raised, particularly around the risks of harmful biases and behaviors being embedded within LLMs and the challenges of detoxifying these systems. A more thorough discussion of these broader implications could have strengthened the paper's overall impact.
Nevertheless, the research provides a valuable and thought-provoking contribution to the ongoing discourse surrounding the development and deployment of large language models. By shining a light on the fundamental challenges of knowledge editing, the paper encourages readers to think critically about the limitations and potential pitfalls of these powerful AI systems, and the need for more robust and reliable approaches to ensure their safe and ethical use.
Conclusion
The paper offers a deep and insightful exploration of the challenges and pitfalls involved in attempting to edit the knowledge and capabilities of large language models (LLMs). Through a comprehensive examination of different knowledge editing approaches, the researchers highlight the immense complexity and interconnectedness of these AI systems, making even seemingly small changes highly risky and prone to unintended consequences.
The use of analogies and examples effectively conveys the difficulty of "editing the mind of giants," likening it to the challenge of surgically modifying a highly complex and integrated system, such as the human brain. This analogy underscores the fundamental difficulties faced in safely and effectively modifying the knowledge and capabilities of these powerful AI models.
While the paper does not provide concrete solutions, it serves as a valuable warning and invitation for the AI research community to further explore the limitations and potential risks of knowledge editing in LLMs. By raising awareness of these critical issues, the paper encourages a deeper understanding of these systems and the development of more robust and reliable techniques for safely editing their knowledge and capabilities.
Overall, the research presented in this paper is a significant contribution to the ongoing dialogue surrounding the responsible development and deployment of large language models, highlighting the need for a cautious and nuanced approach to ensure the safe and ethical use of these AI giants.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Unveiling the Pitfalls of Knowledge Editing for Large Language Models
Zhoubo Li, Ningyu Zhang, Yunzhi Yao, Mengru Wang, Xi Chen, Huajun Chen
0
0
As the cost associated with fine-tuning Large Language Models (LLMs) continues to rise, recent research efforts have pivoted towards developing methodologies to edit implicit knowledge embedded within LLMs. Yet, there's still a dark cloud lingering overhead -- will knowledge editing trigger butterfly effect? since it is still unclear whether knowledge editing might introduce side effects that pose potential risks or not. This paper pioneers the investigation into the potential pitfalls associated with knowledge editing for LLMs. To achieve this, we introduce new benchmark datasets and propose innovative evaluation metrics. Our results underline two pivotal concerns: (1) Knowledge Conflict: Editing groups of facts that logically clash can magnify the inherent inconsistencies in LLMs-a facet neglected by previous methods. (2) Knowledge Distortion: Altering parameters with the aim of editing factual knowledge can irrevocably warp the innate knowledge structure of LLMs. Experimental results vividly demonstrate that knowledge editing might inadvertently cast a shadow of unintended consequences on LLMs, which warrant attention and efforts for future works. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zjunlp/PitfallsKnowledgeEditing.
5/14/2024
💬
EasyEdit: An Easy-to-use Knowledge Editing Framework for Large Language Models
Peng Wang, Ningyu Zhang, Bozhong Tian, Zekun Xi, Yunzhi Yao, Ziwen Xu, Mengru Wang, Shengyu Mao, Xiaohan Wang, Siyuan Cheng, Kangwei Liu, Yuansheng Ni, Guozhou Zheng, Huajun Chen
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) usually suffer from knowledge cutoff or fallacy issues, which means they are unaware of unseen events or generate text with incorrect facts owing to outdated/noisy data. To this end, many knowledge editing approaches for LLMs have emerged -- aiming to subtly inject/edit updated knowledge or adjust undesired behavior while minimizing the impact on unrelated inputs. Nevertheless, due to significant differences among various knowledge editing methods and the variations in task setups, there is no standard implementation framework available for the community, which hinders practitioners from applying knowledge editing to applications. To address these issues, we propose EasyEdit, an easy-to-use knowledge editing framework for LLMs. It supports various cutting-edge knowledge editing approaches and can be readily applied to many well-known LLMs such as T5, GPT-J, LlaMA, etc. Empirically, we report the knowledge editing results on LlaMA-2 with EasyEdit, demonstrating that knowledge editing surpasses traditional fine-tuning in terms of reliability and generalization. We have released the source code on GitHub, along with Google Colab tutorials and comprehensive documentation for beginners to get started. Besides, we present an online system for real-time knowledge editing, and a demo video.
6/26/2024
🔄
Learning to Edit: Aligning LLMs with Knowledge Editing
Yuxin Jiang, Yufei Wang, Chuhan Wu, Wanjun Zhong, Xingshan Zeng, Jiahui Gao, Liangyou Li, Xin Jiang, Lifeng Shang, Ruiming Tang, Qun Liu, Wei Wang
0
0
Knowledge editing techniques, aiming to efficiently modify a minor proportion of knowledge in large language models (LLMs) without negatively impacting performance across other inputs, have garnered widespread attention. However, existing methods predominantly rely on memorizing the updated knowledge, impeding LLMs from effectively combining the new knowledge with their inherent knowledge when answering questions. To this end, we propose a Learning to Edit (LTE) framework, focusing on teaching LLMs to apply updated knowledge into input questions, inspired by the philosophy of Teach a man to fish. LTE features a two-phase process: (i) the Alignment Phase, which fine-tunes LLMs on a meticulously curated parallel dataset to make reliable, in-scope edits while preserving out-of-scope information and linguistic proficiency; and (ii) the Inference Phase, which employs a retrieval-based mechanism for real-time and mass knowledge editing. By comparing our approach with seven advanced baselines across four popular knowledge editing benchmarks and two LLM architectures, we demonstrate LTE's superiority in knowledge editing performance, robustness in both batch and sequential editing, minimal interference on general tasks, and rapid editing speeds. The data and code are available at https://github.com/YJiangcm/LTE.
6/6/2024
💬
Cross-Lingual Knowledge Editing in Large Language Models
Jiaan Wang, Yunlong Liang, Zengkui Sun, Yuxuan Cao, Jiarong Xu, Fandong Meng
0
0
Knowledge editing aims to change language models' performance on several special cases (i.e., editing scope) by infusing the corresponding expected knowledge into them. With the recent advancements in large language models (LLMs), knowledge editing has been shown as a promising technique to adapt LLMs to new knowledge without retraining from scratch. However, most of the previous studies neglect the multi-lingual nature of some main-stream LLMs (e.g., LLaMA, ChatGPT and GPT-4), and typically focus on monolingual scenarios, where LLMs are edited and evaluated in the same language. As a result, it is still unknown the effect of source language editing on a different target language. In this paper, we aim to figure out this cross-lingual effect in knowledge editing. Specifically, we first collect a large-scale cross-lingual synthetic dataset by translating ZsRE from English to Chinese. Then, we conduct English editing on various knowledge editing methods covering different paradigms, and evaluate their performance in Chinese, and vice versa. To give deeper analyses of the cross-lingual effect, the evaluation includes four aspects, i.e., reliability, generality, locality and portability. Furthermore, we analyze the inconsistent behaviors of the edited models and discuss their specific challenges. Data and codes are available at https://github.com/krystalan/Bi_ZsRE
5/31/2024