Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper introduces a framework called "input clarification ensembling" to decompose the uncertainty in large language model (LLM) predictions into aleatoric (data) uncertainty and epistemic (model) uncertainty.
- Aleatoric uncertainty arises from inherent randomness in the data-generating process, while epistemic uncertainty results from missing information in the model's training data.
- Identifying sources of uncertainty is crucial for improving the reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability of LLMs, which is an important open research question.
Plain English Explanation
When we use large language models (LLMs), we often don't know where the uncertainty in their predictions comes from. Is it because the input is ambiguous or incomplete, or is it because the model itself has limitations in its understanding? This paper introduces a new technique called "input clarification ensembling" that can help us figure that out.
The idea is to generate a set of "clarified" versions of the input, run them all through the LLM, and then combine the results. This allows the model to express both the "aleatoric" uncertainty (the uncertainty inherent in the data) and the "epistemic" uncertainty (the uncertainty due to the model's limitations). It's kind of like getting multiple opinions on a question - the disagreement between the opinions can tell you how much uncertainty there is.
The researchers show that this approach works well for various language processing tasks, giving us a better understanding of where the uncertainty in LLM predictions is coming from. This is an important step towards making these models more reliable, trustworthy, and interpretable.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces an uncertainty decomposition framework called "input clarification ensembling" that can be applied to any pre-trained large language model (LLM). The core idea is to generate a set of "clarified" versions of the input, feed them into the LLM, and then ensemble the resulting predictions.
This approach is based on the observation that when aleatoric uncertainty arises from ambiguity or under-specification in the LLM inputs, the clarified inputs can help factor the model's predictions into separate aleatoric and epistemic terms, similar to the decomposition used in Bayesian neural networks.
The authors conduct empirical evaluations on several language processing tasks and demonstrate that input clarification ensembling provides accurate and reliable uncertainty quantification. This is an important step towards improving the reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability of LLMs, which remains an open research challenge.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for decomposing uncertainty in LLM predictions, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
-
The effectiveness of the input clarification approach may depend on the quality and diversity of the clarified inputs generated. The paper does not provide detailed information on the specific techniques used for input clarification, which could be an important area for further investigation.
-
The experiments in the paper are focused on relatively narrow language processing tasks. It would be valuable to see how the approach performs on a broader range of applications, including more open-ended tasks where ambiguity and under-specification may be more prevalent.
-
The paper does not address the potential computational overhead of the input clarification ensembling approach, which could be a concern for real-world deployment in low-latency scenarios. Exploring ways to make the method more computationally efficient would be an important area for future work.
-
The paper does not discuss the potential biases or limitations of the LLMs used in the experiments, which could impact the reliability and interpretability of the uncertainty estimates. Investigating the impact of model instability on explanations and uncertainty would be a valuable area for further research.
Overall, the paper presents a novel and promising approach for uncertainty quantification in LLMs, but there are still important challenges to address to make the technique more robust and widely applicable.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a new framework called "input clarification ensembling" that can help decompose the uncertainty in large language model (LLM) predictions into aleatoric (data) uncertainty and epistemic (model) uncertainty. By generating clarified versions of the input and ensembling the resulting predictions, the approach can provide more reliable and interpretable uncertainty estimates, which is an important step towards improving the trustworthiness and reliability of LLMs.
The empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the approach, but there are still some limitations and areas for further research, such as the impact of input clarification techniques, the scalability of the method, and the potential biases in the underlying LLMs. Overall, this paper presents a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to harness the power of LLMs while addressing their uncertainty-related challenges.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
Decomposing Uncertainty for Large Language Models through Input Clarification Ensembling
Bairu Hou, Yujian Liu, Kaizhi Qian, Jacob Andreas, Shiyu Chang, Yang Zhang
Uncertainty decomposition refers to the task of decomposing the total uncertainty of a predictive model into aleatoric (data) uncertainty, resulting from inherent randomness in the data-generating process, and epistemic (model) uncertainty, resulting from missing information in the model's training data. In large language models (LLMs) specifically, identifying sources of uncertainty is an important step toward improving reliability, trustworthiness, and interpretability, but remains an important open research question. In this paper, we introduce an uncertainty decomposition framework for LLMs, called input clarification ensembling, which can be applied to any pre-trained LLM. Our approach generates a set of clarifications for the input, feeds them into an LLM, and ensembles the corresponding predictions. We show that, when aleatoric uncertainty arises from ambiguity or under-specification in LLM inputs, this approach makes it possible to factor an (unclarified) LLM's predictions into separate aleatoric and epistemic terms, using a decomposition similar to the one employed by Bayesian neural networks. Empirical evaluations demonstrate that input clarification ensembling provides accurate and reliable uncertainty quantification on several language processing tasks. Code and data are available at https://github.com/UCSB-NLP-Chang/llm_uncertainty.
Read more6/12/2024
💬
0
Uncertainty Quantification for In-Context Learning of Large Language Models
Chen Ling, Xujiang Zhao, Xuchao Zhang, Wei Cheng, Yanchi Liu, Yiyou Sun, Mika Oishi, Takao Osaki, Katsushi Matsuda, Jie Ji, Guangji Bai, Liang Zhao, Haifeng Chen
In-context learning has emerged as a groundbreaking ability of Large Language Models (LLMs) and revolutionized various fields by providing a few task-relevant demonstrations in the prompt. However, trustworthy issues with LLM's response, such as hallucination, have also been actively discussed. Existing works have been devoted to quantifying the uncertainty in LLM's response, but they often overlook the complex nature of LLMs and the uniqueness of in-context learning. In this work, we delve into the predictive uncertainty of LLMs associated with in-context learning, highlighting that such uncertainties may stem from both the provided demonstrations (aleatoric uncertainty) and ambiguities tied to the model's configurations (epistemic uncertainty). We propose a novel formulation and corresponding estimation method to quantify both types of uncertainties. The proposed method offers an unsupervised way to understand the prediction of in-context learning in a plug-and-play fashion. Extensive experiments are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the decomposition. The code and data are available at: https://github.com/lingchen0331/UQ_ICL.
Read more4/1/2024
0
Unified Uncertainties: Combining Input, Data and Model Uncertainty into a Single Formulation
Matias Valdenegro-Toro, Ivo Pascal de Jong, Marco Zullich
Modelling uncertainty in Machine Learning models is essential for achieving safe and reliable predictions. Most research on uncertainty focuses on output uncertainty (predictions), but minimal attention is paid to uncertainty at inputs. We propose a method for propagating uncertainty in the inputs through a Neural Network that is simultaneously able to estimate input, data, and model uncertainty. Our results show that this propagation of input uncertainty results in a more stable decision boundary even under large amounts of input noise than comparatively simple Monte Carlo sampling. Additionally, we discuss and demonstrate that input uncertainty, when propagated through the model, results in model uncertainty at the outputs. The explicit incorporation of input uncertainty may be beneficial in situations where the amount of input uncertainty is known, though good datasets for this are still needed.
Read more6/28/2024
0
DEMAU: Decompose, Explore, Model and Analyse Uncertainties
Arthur Hoarau, Vincent Lemaire
Recent research in machine learning has given rise to a flourishing literature on the quantification and decomposition of model uncertainty. This information can be very useful during interactions with the learner, such as in active learning or adaptive learning, and especially in uncertainty sampling. To allow a simple representation of these total, epistemic (reducible) and aleatoric (irreducible) uncertainties, we offer DEMAU, an open-source educational, exploratory and analytical tool allowing to visualize and explore several types of uncertainty for classification models in machine learning.
Read more9/14/2024