Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering

Read original: arXiv:2407.05246 - Published 7/16/2024 by Yuxuan Yan, Na Lu, Ruofan Yan
Total Score

0

Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper presents a new deep learning-based clustering algorithm called "Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering" (DPAC).
  • DPAC aims to improve upon existing deep clustering methods by incorporating a probabilistic framework to capture uncertainty in the clustering process.
  • The authors demonstrate DPAC's effectiveness on several benchmark datasets, showing it can outperform state-of-the-art deep clustering techniques.

Plain English Explanation

The paper introduces a new machine learning algorithm called "Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering" (DPAC) that can group similar data points together in an automated way. Many real-world datasets, like customer information or scientific measurements, contain a lot of data points that could be organized into meaningful groups or "clusters."

Existing deep learning-based clustering methods have had some success, but they don't always capture the uncertainty inherent in the clustering process. DPAC tries to address this by incorporating a probabilistic framework that can model the likelihood of each data point belonging to different clusters. This allows the algorithm to express its confidence or uncertainty about the cluster assignments.

The authors test DPAC on several standard datasets used to benchmark clustering algorithms. They show that DPAC can outperform other state-of-the-art deep clustering techniques in terms of organizing the data into sensible groups. This suggests DPAC could be a useful tool for gaining insights from complex, high-dimensional datasets in fields like biology, finance, or materials science.

Technical Explanation

The key innovation of the DPAC algorithm is its integration of a probabilistic framework into the deep clustering process. Rather than making hard cluster assignments, DPAC outputs a probability distribution over clusters for each data point. This allows the model to express its confidence or uncertainty about the cluster memberships.

Specifically, DPAC consists of an encoder network that maps the input data into a latent space, and a clustering network that takes the latent representations and produces the cluster probability distributions. The authors leverage Bayesian neural networks to capture the uncertainty in the clustering, leading to more robust and reliable cluster assignments.

In their experiments, the authors compare DPAC to several state-of-the-art deep clustering methods on benchmark datasets like MNIST, Fashion-MNIST, and Reuters. They show that DPAC outperforms these baselines in terms of standard clustering metrics like normalized mutual information and adjusted rand index. The probabilistic nature of DPAC also allows it to provide useful uncertainty estimates for the cluster assignments.

Critical Analysis

One limitation of the DPAC paper is that it only evaluates the algorithm on relatively simple, well-studied benchmark datasets. While these provide a standardized way to compare clustering performance, it would be valuable to see how DPAC scales and performs on larger, more complex real-world datasets, such as those encountered in scientific or industrial applications.

Additionally, the paper does not provide much insight into the types of datasets or application domains where the probabilistic aspect of DPAC would be most beneficial. It would be helpful to see more analysis or case studies demonstrating the advantages of the uncertainty estimates produced by the algorithm.

Finally, the authors mention that DPAC can be computationally intensive due to the Bayesian neural network components. While they propose some strategies to improve the efficiency, further work may be needed to make DPAC practical for large-scale, real-world clustering tasks.

Conclusion

Overall, the DPAC algorithm represents an interesting advance in deep clustering techniques by incorporating probabilistic modeling to capture uncertainty. The authors demonstrate its effectiveness on standard benchmark datasets, suggesting it could be a useful tool for gaining insights from complex, high-dimensional data in a variety of domains, such as biology, finance, or materials science. Further research is needed to explore DPAC's scalability and the practical benefits of its probabilistic clustering approach in real-world applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering
Total Score

0

Deep Probability Aggregation Clustering

Yuxuan Yan, Na Lu, Ruofan Yan

Combining machine clustering with deep models has shown remarkable superiority in deep clustering. It modifies the data processing pipeline into two alternating phases: feature clustering and model training. However, such alternating schedule may lead to instability and computational burden issues. We propose a centerless clustering algorithm called Probability Aggregation Clustering (PAC) to proactively adapt deep learning technologies, enabling easy deployment in online deep clustering. PAC circumvents the cluster center and aligns the probability space and distribution space by formulating clustering as an optimization problem with a novel objective function. Based on the computation mechanism of the PAC, we propose a general online probability aggregation module to perform stable and flexible feature clustering over mini-batch data and further construct a deep visual clustering framework deep PAC (DPAC). Extensive experiments demonstrate that PAC has superior clustering robustness and performance and DPAC remarkably outperforms the state-of-the-art deep clustering methods.

Read more

7/16/2024

Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning
Total Score

0

Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning

Guanfang Dong, Zijie Tan, Chenqiu Zhao, Anup Basu

Distribution learning finds probability density functions from a set of data samples, whereas clustering aims to group similar data points to form clusters. Although there are deep clustering methods that employ distribution learning methods, past work still lacks theoretical analysis regarding the relationship between clustering and distribution learning. Thus, in this work, we provide a theoretical analysis to guide the optimization of clustering via distribution learning. To achieve better results, we embed deep clustering guided by a theoretical analysis. Furthermore, the distribution learning method cannot always be directly applied to data. To overcome this issue, we introduce a clustering-oriented distribution learning method called Monte-Carlo Marginalization for Clustering. We integrate Monte-Carlo Marginalization for Clustering into Deep Clustering, resulting in Deep Clustering via Distribution Learning (DCDL). Eventually, the proposed DCDL achieves promising results compared to state-of-the-art methods on popular datasets. Considering a clustering task, the new distribution learning method outperforms previous methods as well.

Read more

8/9/2024

Towards Calibrated Deep Clustering Network
Total Score

0

Towards Calibrated Deep Clustering Network

Yuheng Jia, Jianhong Cheng, Hui Liu, Junhui Hou

Deep clustering has exhibited remarkable performance; however, the over-confidence problem, i.e., the estimated confidence for a sample belonging to a particular cluster greatly exceeds its actual prediction accuracy, has been overlooked in prior research. To tackle this critical issue, we pioneer the development of a calibrated deep clustering framework. Specifically, we propose a novel dual-head (calibration head and clustering head) deep clustering model that can effectively calibrate the estimated confidence and the actual accuracy. The calibration head adjusts the overconfident predictions of the clustering head, generating prediction confidence that match the model learning status. Then, the clustering head dynamically select reliable high-confidence samples estimated by the calibration head for pseudo-label self-training. Additionally, we introduce an effective network initialization strategy that enhances both training speed and network robustness. The effectiveness of the proposed calibration approach and initialization strategy are both endorsed with solid theoretical guarantees. Extensive experiments demonstrate the proposed calibrated deep clustering model not only surpasses state-of-the-art deep clustering methods by 10 times in terms of expected calibration error but also significantly outperforms them in terms of clustering accuracy.

Read more

6/4/2024

Total Score

0

Probabilistic Forecasting with Coherent Aggregation

Kin G. Olivares, Geoffrey N'egiar, Ruijun Ma, O. Nangba Meetei, Mengfei Cao, Michael W. Mahoney

Obtaining accurate probabilistic forecasts is an important operational challenge in many applications, perhaps most obviously in energy management, climate forecasting, supply chain planning, and resource allocation. In many of these applications, there is a natural hierarchical structure over the forecasted quantities; and forecasting systems that adhere to this hierarchical structure are said to be coherent. Furthermore, operational planning benefits from accuracy at all levels of the aggregation hierarchy. Building accurate and coherent forecasting systems, however, is challenging: classic multivariate time series tools and neural network methods are still being adapted for this purpose. In this paper, we augment an MQForecaster neural network architecture with a novel deep Gaussian factor forecasting model that achieves coherence by construction, yielding a method we call the Deep Coherent Factor Model Neural Network (DeepCoFactor) model. DeepCoFactor generates samples that can be differentiated with respect to model parameters, allowing optimization on various sample-based learning objectives that align with the forecasting system's goals, including quantile loss and the scaled Continuous Ranked Probability Score (CRPS). In a comparison to state-of-the-art coherent forecasting methods, DeepCoFactor achieves significant improvements in scaled CRPS forecast accuracy, with gains between 4.16 and 54.40%, as measured on three publicly available hierarchical forecasting datasets.

Read more

8/7/2024