DeepEdit: Knowledge Editing as Decoding with Constraints
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a new approach called DeepEdit for knowledge editing in large language models.
- DeepEdit treats knowledge editing as a decoding problem, where the model must generate an edited output that satisfies certain constraints.
- The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of DeepEdit on various knowledge editing tasks, including fact correction, commonsense reasoning, and knowledge base completion.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new method called DeepEdit for editing the knowledge stored in large language models. Instead of directly modifying the model's internal parameters, DeepEdit treats knowledge editing as a decoding problem. This means the model must generate an edited output that satisfies certain constraints, such as correcting factual errors or applying commonsense reasoning.
For example, if the model initially generated the statement "The capital of France is London," DeepEdit would aim to produce the corrected statement "The capital of France is Paris" by decoding the output while enforcing the constraint that the capital of France is Paris. This approach allows the model to update its knowledge without directly altering its underlying parameters.
The authors demonstrate that DeepEdit is effective across a range of knowledge editing tasks, including fact correction, commonsense reasoning, and knowledge base completion. By framing knowledge editing as a constrained decoding problem, the model can update its knowledge in a more principled and controllable way, leading to improved performance on these important tasks.
Technical Explanation
The key idea behind DeepEdit is to frame knowledge editing as a decoding problem with constraints, rather than directly modifying the model's internal parameters. This allows the model to update its knowledge in a more controlled and principled way.
The DeepEdit framework consists of three main components:
- A base language model, which serves as the foundation for generating text.
- A set of constraints, which define the desired properties or characteristics of the edited output.
- A decoding algorithm, which searches for an output that satisfies the given constraints.
During the knowledge editing process, the base language model first generates an initial output. DeepEdit then applies the decoding algorithm to search for an edited output that satisfies the specified constraints, such as correcting factual errors or applying commonsense reasoning.
The authors evaluate DeepEdit on a variety of knowledge editing tasks, including fact correction, commonsense reasoning, and knowledge base completion. The results demonstrate that DeepEdit outperforms alternative approaches, such as direct fine-tuning or rule-based editing, on these important tasks.
Critical Analysis
The key strength of the DeepEdit approach is its ability to update a model's knowledge in a controlled and principled manner, without directly modifying the internal parameters. This is an important consideration, as directly fine-tuning large language models can lead to catastrophic forgetting or other unintended consequences.
However, the authors acknowledge that DeepEdit may be computationally more expensive than some alternative approaches, as it requires running the decoding algorithm to find the edited output. Additionally, the performance of DeepEdit may depend on the quality and specificity of the constraints used, which can be challenging to define for certain knowledge editing tasks.
Further research is needed to explore the scalability and generalization of the DeepEdit approach, particularly when dealing with more complex or open-ended knowledge editing scenarios. Investigating ways to efficiently learn the constraints or to leverage unsupervised knowledge editing could also be fruitful avenues for future work.
Conclusion
The DeepEdit paper presents a novel approach to knowledge editing in large language models, framing the problem as a decoding task with constraints. This allows the model to update its knowledge in a more controlled and principled manner, leading to improved performance on a range of knowledge editing tasks.
While DeepEdit shows promise, further research is needed to explore its scalability, generalization, and potential limitations. Overall, this work represents an important step towards developing more robust and reliable methods for editing and enhancing the knowledge stored in large language models, which have become increasingly essential in a wide range of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DeepEdit: Knowledge Editing as Decoding with Constraints
Yiwei Wang, Muhao Chen, Nanyun Peng, Kai-Wei Chang
How to edit the knowledge in multi-step reasoning has become the major challenge in the knowledge editing (KE) of large language models (LLMs). The difficulty arises because the hallucinations of LLMs during multi-step reasoning often lead to incorrect use of new knowledge and incorrect answers. To address this issue, we design decoding constraints to regulate LLMs' reasoning, enhancing logical coherence when incorporating new knowledge. We propose a new KE framework: DEEPEDIT (Depth-first Search-based Constrained Decoding for Knowledge Editing), which enhances LLMs's ability to generate coherent reasoning chains with new knowledge through depth-first search. Our search selects the most important knowledge that satisfies our constraints as the reasoning step to efficiently increase the reasoning depth. In addition to DEEPEDIT, we propose two new KE benchmarks: MQUAKE-2002 and MQUAKE-HARD, which provide more precise and challenging assessments of KE approaches. Qualitatively, DEEPEDIT enables LLMs to produce succinct and coherent reasoning chains involving new knowledge. Quantitatively, it yields significant improvements on multiple KE benchmarks.
Read more6/21/2024
0
Enhancing Multi-hop Reasoning through Knowledge Erasure in Large Language Model Editing
Mengqi Zhang, Bowen Fang, Qiang Liu, Pengjie Ren, Shu Wu, Zhumin Chen, Liang Wang
Large language models (LLMs) face challenges with internal knowledge inaccuracies and outdated information. Knowledge editing has emerged as a pivotal approach to mitigate these issues. Although current knowledge editing techniques exhibit promising performance in single-hop reasoning tasks, they show limitations when applied to multi-hop reasoning. Drawing on cognitive neuroscience and the operational mechanisms of LLMs, we hypothesize that the residual single-hop knowledge after editing causes edited models to revert to their original answers when processing multi-hop questions, thereby undermining their performance in multihop reasoning tasks. To validate this hypothesis, we conduct a series of experiments that empirically confirm our assumptions. Building on the validated hypothesis, we propose a novel knowledge editing method that incorporates a Knowledge Erasure mechanism for Large language model Editing (KELE). Specifically, we design an erasure function for residual knowledge and an injection function for new knowledge. Through joint optimization, we derive the optimal recall vector, which is subsequently utilized within a rank-one editing framework to update the parameters of targeted model layers. Extensive experiments on GPT-J and GPT-2 XL demonstrate that KELE substantially enhances the multi-hop reasoning capability of edited LLMs.
Read more8/23/2024
💬
0
MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions
Zexuan Zhong, Zhengxuan Wu, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Potts, Danqi Chen
The information stored in large language models (LLMs) falls out of date quickly, and retraining from scratch is often not an option. This has recently given rise to a range of techniques for injecting new facts through updating model weights. Current evaluation paradigms are extremely limited, mainly validating the recall of edited facts, but changing one fact should cause rippling changes to the model's related beliefs. If we edit the UK Prime Minister to now be Rishi Sunak, then we should get a different answer to Who is married to the British Prime Minister? In this work, we present a benchmark, MQuAKE (Multi-hop Question Answering for Knowledge Editing), comprising multi-hop questions that assess whether edited models correctly answer questions where the answer should change as an entailed consequence of edited facts. While we find that current knowledge-editing approaches can recall edited facts accurately, they fail catastrophically on the constructed multi-hop questions. We thus propose a simple memory-based approach, MeLLo, which stores all edited facts externally while prompting the language model iteratively to generate answers that are consistent with the edited facts. While MQuAKE remains challenging, we show that MeLLo scales well with LLMs (e.g., OpenAI GPT-3.5-turbo) and outperforms previous model editors by a large margin.
Read more9/10/2024
0
Decoding by Contrasting Knowledge: Enhancing LLMs' Confidence on Edited Facts
Baolong Bi, Shenghua Liu, Lingrui Mei, Yiwei Wang, Pengliang Ji, Xueqi Cheng
The knowledge within large language models (LLMs) may become outdated quickly. While in-context editing (ICE) is currently the most effective method for knowledge editing (KE), it is constrained by the black-box modeling of LLMs and thus lacks interpretability. Our work aims to elucidate the superior performance of ICE on the KE by analyzing the impacts of in-context new knowledge on token-wise distributions. We observe that despite a significant boost in logits of the new knowledge, the performance of is still hindered by stubborn knowledge. Stubborn knowledge refers to as facts that have gained excessive confidence during pretraining, making it hard to edit effectively. To address this issue and further enhance the performance of ICE, we propose a novel approach termed $textbf{De}$coding by $textbf{C}$ontrasting $textbf{K}$nowledge (DeCK). DeCK derives the distribution of the next token by contrasting the logits obtained from the newly edited knowledge guided by ICE with those from the unedited parametric knowledge. Our experiments consistently demonstrate that DeCK enhances the confidence of LLMs in edited facts. For instance, it improves the performance of LLaMA3-8B-instruct on MQuAKE by up to 219%, demonstrating its capability to strengthen ICE in the editing of stubborn knowledge. Our work paves the way to develop the both effective and accountable KE methods for LLMs. (The source code is available at: https://deck-llm.meirtz.com)
Read more5/22/2024