Leveraging Logical Rules in Knowledge Editing: A Cherry on the Top
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores the use of logical rules and reasoning to enhance knowledge editing and large language models.
- It builds on related research in areas like logic-guided language models, rule-based knowledge graph reasoning, and complex reasoning over knowledge graphs.
- The key idea is to leverage logical constraints and inference to guide and improve the knowledge editing process for large language models.
Plain English Explanation
Imagine you're writing a story, and you want to make sure everything is logically consistent - for example, if a character is supposed to be in one place, they can't also be in another place at the same time. This paper looks at ways to apply that kind of logical reasoning to the process of editing and updating the knowledge bases that power large language models.
The researchers propose using a set of logical rules and constraints to check the knowledge being added or modified, to ensure it makes sense and doesn't contradict other information the model already knows. This could help catch errors or inconsistencies that might slip through with more traditional knowledge editing approaches.
By enhancing question answering with enterprise knowledge bases and incorporating event-level knowledge editing, the goal is to create a more robust and reliable knowledge base that can better support the language model in tasks like question answering, reasoning, and even generating coherent text.
Technical Explanation
The key technical approach involves defining a set of logical rules and constraints that capture domain-specific knowledge and relationships. When new information is added or existing knowledge is edited, these rules are used to verify the consistency and validity of the changes.
The architecture includes modules for parsing the input knowledge, applying the logical rules, and generating feedback or corrections as needed. This allows the knowledge base to be gradually refined and improved over time, with the logical reasoning serving as a "cherry on top" to ensure high quality.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on various knowledge editing tasks, showing that the logical rules can indeed help identify and resolve inconsistencies that would otherwise be missed. The authors also discuss how this framework can be extended to handle more complex reasoning patterns and support a wider range of knowledge-intensive applications.
Critical Analysis
While the proposed approach shows promising results, there are some important caveats to consider. The effectiveness of the logical rules is heavily dependent on the completeness and accuracy of the rule set, which can be challenging to build and maintain, especially for large-scale, diverse knowledge bases.
Additionally, the paper does not extensively explore the tradeoffs between the benefits of logical reasoning and the potential computational overhead or complexity it introduces. Depending on the specific use case and requirements, the added complexity may not always be justified.
Further research is needed to better understand the generalizability of this approach, its scalability to real-world knowledge bases, and its performance compared to other knowledge editing techniques. Exploring ways to automatically learn or refine the logical rules, rather than relying solely on manual curation, could also be a promising direction.
Conclusion
Overall, this paper presents an interesting approach to leveraging logical reasoning to enhance knowledge editing and improve the quality and consistency of large language models' knowledge bases. By applying domain-specific rules and constraints, the proposed framework can help identify and resolve logical inconsistencies that might otherwise go unnoticed.
While there are still some challenges to overcome, this work contributes to the growing body of research exploring ways to make knowledge-intensive AI systems more robust, reliable, and transparent. As language models continue to play an increasingly important role in our lives, techniques like this that can help ensure the integrity of their knowledge foundations will become increasingly valuable.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Leveraging Logical Rules in Knowledge Editing: A Cherry on the Top
Keyuan Cheng, Muhammad Asif Ali, Shu Yang, Gang Lin, Yuxuan Zhai, Haoyang Fei, Ke Xu, Lu Yu, Lijie Hu, Di Wang
Multi-hop Question Answering (MQA) under knowledge editing (KE) is a key challenge in Large Language Models (LLMs). While best-performing solutions in this domain use a plan and solve paradigm to split a question into sub-questions followed by response generation, we claim that this approach is sub-optimal as it fails for hard to decompose questions, and it does not explicitly cater to correlated knowledge updates resulting as a consequence of knowledge edits. This has a detrimental impact on the overall consistency of the updated knowledge. To address these issues, in this paper, we propose a novel framework named RULE-KE, i.e., RULE based Knowledge Editing, which is a cherry on the top for augmenting the performance of all existing MQA methods under KE. Specifically, RULE-KE leverages rule discovery to discover a set of logical rules. Then, it uses these discovered rules to update knowledge about facts highly correlated with the edit. Experimental evaluation using existing and newly curated datasets (i.e., RKE-EVAL) shows that RULE-KE helps augment both performances of parameter-based and memory-based solutions up to 92% and 112.9%, respectively.
Read more5/28/2024
0
DeepEdit: Knowledge Editing as Decoding with Constraints
Yiwei Wang, Muhao Chen, Nanyun Peng, Kai-Wei Chang
How to edit the knowledge in multi-step reasoning has become the major challenge in the knowledge editing (KE) of large language models (LLMs). The difficulty arises because the hallucinations of LLMs during multi-step reasoning often lead to incorrect use of new knowledge and incorrect answers. To address this issue, we design decoding constraints to regulate LLMs' reasoning, enhancing logical coherence when incorporating new knowledge. We propose a new KE framework: DEEPEDIT (Depth-first Search-based Constrained Decoding for Knowledge Editing), which enhances LLMs's ability to generate coherent reasoning chains with new knowledge through depth-first search. Our search selects the most important knowledge that satisfies our constraints as the reasoning step to efficiently increase the reasoning depth. In addition to DEEPEDIT, we propose two new KE benchmarks: MQUAKE-2002 and MQUAKE-HARD, which provide more precise and challenging assessments of KE approaches. Qualitatively, DEEPEDIT enables LLMs to produce succinct and coherent reasoning chains involving new knowledge. Quantitatively, it yields significant improvements on multiple KE benchmarks.
Read more6/21/2024
💬
0
MQuAKE: Assessing Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Multi-Hop Questions
Zexuan Zhong, Zhengxuan Wu, Christopher D. Manning, Christopher Potts, Danqi Chen
The information stored in large language models (LLMs) falls out of date quickly, and retraining from scratch is often not an option. This has recently given rise to a range of techniques for injecting new facts through updating model weights. Current evaluation paradigms are extremely limited, mainly validating the recall of edited facts, but changing one fact should cause rippling changes to the model's related beliefs. If we edit the UK Prime Minister to now be Rishi Sunak, then we should get a different answer to Who is married to the British Prime Minister? In this work, we present a benchmark, MQuAKE (Multi-hop Question Answering for Knowledge Editing), comprising multi-hop questions that assess whether edited models correctly answer questions where the answer should change as an entailed consequence of edited facts. While we find that current knowledge-editing approaches can recall edited facts accurately, they fail catastrophically on the constructed multi-hop questions. We thus propose a simple memory-based approach, MeLLo, which stores all edited facts externally while prompting the language model iteratively to generate answers that are consistent with the edited facts. While MQuAKE remains challenging, we show that MeLLo scales well with LLMs (e.g., OpenAI GPT-3.5-turbo) and outperforms previous model editors by a large margin.
Read more9/10/2024
0
LLM-Based Multi-Hop Question Answering with Knowledge Graph Integration in Evolving Environments
Ruirui Chen, Weifeng Jiang, Chengwei Qin, Ishaan Singh Rawal, Cheston Tan, Dongkyu Choi, Bo Xiong, Bo Ai
The rapid obsolescence of information in Large Language Models (LLMs) has driven the development of various techniques to incorporate new facts. However, existing methods for knowledge editing still face difficulties with multi-hop questions that require accurate fact identification and sequential logical reasoning, particularly among numerous fact updates. To tackle these challenges, this paper introduces Graph Memory-based Editing for Large Language Models (GMeLLo), a straitforward and effective method that merges the explicit knowledge representation of Knowledge Graphs (KGs) with the linguistic flexibility of LLMs. Beyond merely leveraging LLMs for question answering, GMeLLo employs these models to convert free-form language into structured queries and fact triples, facilitating seamless interaction with KGs for rapid updates and precise multi-hop reasoning. Our results show that GMeLLo significantly surpasses current state-of-the-art knowledge editing methods in the multi-hop question answering benchmark, MQuAKE, especially in scenarios with extensive knowledge edits.
Read more8/29/2024