Dialogue Action Tokens: Steering Language Models in Goal-Directed Dialogue with a Multi-Turn Planner
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces "Dialogue Action Tokens" (DATs), a novel approach for steering language models towards goal-directed dialogue.
- DATs are special tokens that guide the language model to take specific actions, such as asking for clarification, providing a summary, or making a recommendation.
- The authors propose a multi-turn planner that selects appropriate DATs to generate coherent and purposeful dialogues.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to control the conversation flow of language models in goal-oriented dialogues. The key idea is to use special "Dialogue Action Tokens" (DATs) that tell the model what to do next, such as asking for more information, summarizing the discussion, or making a recommendation.
These DATs are selected by a multi-turn planning system that keeps track of the dialogue context and chooses the most appropriate action to take. This helps the language model generate more coherent and purposeful conversations, rather than just producing random responses.
The approach is designed to make language models better at engaging in goal-directed tasks, like helping a customer find a product, providing technical support, or guiding a user through a decision-making process. By incorporating this planning component, the model can stay focused on the end objective and generate more helpful and relevant dialogue.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces "Dialogue Action Tokens" (DATs), which are special tokens that can be inserted into the input of a language model to steer it towards taking specific actions in a goal-oriented dialogue. These actions include requesting clarification, summarizing the discussion, making a recommendation, and more.
The authors propose a multi-turn planner that selects the appropriate DATs based on the current dialogue context. This planner maintains a representation of the conversation state and uses reinforcement learning to choose DATs that will lead the dialogue towards the desired goal.
The language model is fine-tuned on dialogues containing these DATs, allowing it to learn how to generate appropriate responses for each action. During inference, the planner dynamically inserts DATs into the input to guide the model's generation and keep the dialogue on track.
The authors evaluate their approach on several goal-oriented dialogue datasets and show that it outperforms baseline language models in terms of task completion, coherence, and human evaluations. The DATs and planning mechanism help the model stay focused on the conversational objective and produce more natural and helpful responses.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for improving the goal-directed capabilities of language models in dialogue systems. The use of Dialogue Action Tokens is an intuitive way to provide explicit guidance to the model, and the multi-turn planning component helps maintain coherence and progress towards the desired objective.
One potential limitation is that the approach relies on having a predefined set of DATs, which may not be able to capture the full breadth of possible dialogue actions. Additionally, the planning mechanism could become more complex as the number of DATs and dialogue goals increases. The authors acknowledge these challenges and suggest exploring more flexible planning approaches in future work.
Another area for further research is how well this method generalizes to more open-ended, multi-purpose dialogue scenarios, beyond the goal-oriented tasks explored in the paper. Integrating DATs and planning with other language model innovations, such as Learning to Clarify Multi-turn Conversations, Enhancing Dialogue State Tracking Models Through LLM, or DiagGPT: LLM-based Multi-Agent Dialogue System, could also be a fruitful direction.
Overall, the Dialogue Action Tokens approach represents an exciting step forward in making language models more capable of engaging in purposeful, goal-directed dialogue. With further refinement and exploration of its broader applications, it has the potential to significantly improve the quality and usefulness of conversational AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper introduces Dialogue Action Tokens (DATs), a novel technique for steering language models towards generating more coherent and goal-oriented dialogues. By incorporating a multi-turn planning component that selects appropriate DATs based on the dialogue context, the authors demonstrate improvements in task completion, coherence, and overall conversational quality.
The DAT approach represents an important advancement in making language models better suited for real-world, goal-directed applications, such as customer support, task-oriented assistants, and educational tutoring systems. By providing explicit guidance to the model through the use of action tokens, the system can stay focused on the conversational objective and produce more natural and helpful responses.
While the current work is focused on specific goal-oriented scenarios, the underlying principles could potentially be extended to more open-ended dialogue situations. Integrating DATs and planning with other recent innovations in conversational AI, such as Learning to Model World Language and From Words to Actions: Unveiling Theoretical Underpinnings, could lead to even more versatile and capable dialogue systems.
Overall, the Dialogue Action Tokens approach represents an exciting step forward in the field of conversational AI, with the potential to significantly improve the quality and usefulness of language models in real-world applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Dialogue Action Tokens: Steering Language Models in Goal-Directed Dialogue with a Multi-Turn Planner
Kenneth Li, Yiming Wang, Fernanda Vi'egas, Martin Wattenberg
We present an approach called Dialogue Action Tokens (DAT) that adapts language model agents to plan goal-directed dialogues. The core idea is to treat each utterance as an action, thereby converting dialogues into games where existing approaches such as reinforcement learning can be applied. Specifically, we freeze a pretrained language model and train a small planner model that predicts a continuous action vector, used for controlled generation in each round. This design avoids the problem of language degradation under reward optimization. When evaluated on the Sotopia platform for social simulations, the DAT-steered LLaMA model surpasses GPT-4's performance. We also apply DAT to steer an attacker language model in a novel multi-turn red-teaming setting, revealing a potential new attack surface.
Read more6/19/2024
0
Learning to Clarify: Multi-turn Conversations with Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training
Maximillian Chen, Ruoxi Sun, Sercan O. Ar{i}k, Tomas Pfister
Large language models (LLMs) aligned through reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) have quickly become one of the dominant paradigms for building intelligent conversational assistant agents. However, despite their strong performance across many benchmarks, LLM-based agents still lack conversational skills such as disambiguation: when generalized assistants are faced with ambiguity, they often overhedge or implicitly guess users' ground-truth intents rather than asking clarification questions, and under task-specific settings, high-quality conversation samples are often limited, affecting models' ability to learn optimal dialogue action policies. We propose Action-Based Contrastive Self-Training (henceforth ACT), a quasi-online preference optimization algorithm based on Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) which allows for sample-efficient dialogue policy learning in multi-turn conversation. We demonstrate ACT's efficacy under sample-efficient conditions in three difficult conversational tasks: tabular-grounded question-answering, machine reading comprehension, and AmbigSQL, a novel task for disambiguating information-seeking requests for text-to-SQL generation. Additionally, we propose evaluating LLMs' ability to function as conversational agents by examining whether they can implicitly recognize and reason about ambiguity in conversation. ACT demonstrates substantial conversation modeling improvements over standard approaches to supervised fine-tuning and DPO.
Read more6/4/2024
🖼️
0
Enhancing Dialogue State Tracking Models through LLM-backed User-Agents Simulation
Cheng Niu, Xingguang Wang, Xuxin Cheng, Juntong Song, Tong Zhang
Dialogue State Tracking (DST) is designed to monitor the evolving dialogue state in the conversations and plays a pivotal role in developing task-oriented dialogue systems. However, obtaining the annotated data for the DST task is usually a costly endeavor. In this paper, we focus on employing LLMs to generate dialogue data to reduce dialogue collection and annotation costs. Specifically, GPT-4 is used to simulate the user and agent interaction, generating thousands of dialogues annotated with DST labels. Then a two-stage fine-tuning on LLaMA 2 is performed on the generated data and the real data for the DST prediction. Experimental results on two public DST benchmarks show that with the generated dialogue data, our model performs better than the baseline trained solely on real data. In addition, our approach is also capable of adapting to the dynamic demands in real-world scenarios, generating dialogues in new domains swiftly. After replacing dialogue segments in any domain with the corresponding generated ones, the model achieves comparable performance to the model trained on real data.
Read more5/24/2024
✨
0
DiagGPT: An LLM-based and Multi-agent Dialogue System with Automatic Topic Management for Flexible Task-Oriented Dialogue
Lang Cao
A significant application of Large Language Models (LLMs), like ChatGPT, is their deployment as chat agents, which respond to human inquiries across a variety of domains. While current LLMs proficiently answer general questions, they often fall short in complex diagnostic scenarios such as legal, medical, or other specialized consultations. These scenarios typically require Task-Oriented Dialogue (TOD), where an AI chat agent must proactively pose questions and guide users toward specific goals or task completion. Previous fine-tuning models have underperformed in TOD and the full potential of conversational capability in current LLMs has not yet been fully explored. In this paper, we introduce DiagGPT (Dialogue in Diagnosis GPT), an innovative approach that extends LLMs to more TOD scenarios. In addition to guiding users to complete tasks, DiagGPT can effectively manage the status of all topics throughout the dialogue development. This feature enhances user experience and offers a more flexible interaction in TOD. Our experiments demonstrate that DiagGPT exhibits outstanding performance in conducting TOD with users, showing its potential for practical applications in various fields.
Read more4/16/2024