Learning to Model the World with Language

Read original: arXiv:2308.01399 - Published 6/3/2024 by Jessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner, Pieter Abbeel, Dan Klein, Anca Dragan
Total Score

0

📈

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Current AI agents can execute simple language instructions, but the goal is to build agents that can understand and leverage diverse language that conveys general knowledge, describes the world, and provides interactive feedback.
  • The key idea is that agents should interpret language as a signal that helps them predict the future: what they will observe, how the world will behave, and which situations will be rewarded.
  • This perspective unifies language understanding with future prediction as a powerful self-supervised learning objective.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers want to create AI agents that can understand and interact with humans using a wide range of language, not just simple commands. They believe that by treating language as a way for the agent to predict what will happen in the future - what it will see, how the world will change, and what actions will be rewarded - the agent can learn to better understand and use language to accomplish tasks.

This is different from current methods that simply try to map language directly to actions. Instead, the agent will use language as a clue to build a more comprehensive model of the world, which it can then use to plan its actions and predict future outcomes. This unified approach to language understanding and future prediction could lead to agents that are much more capable of understanding and using natural language.

Technical Explanation

The researchers propose an agent called Dynalang that learns a multimodal world model to predict future text and image representations, and learns to act from imagining the outcomes of its potential actions. Unlike current methods that degrade in performance when faced with more diverse language, Dynalang is able to leverage environment descriptions, game rules, and instructions to excel at a wide range of tasks, from gameplay to navigating photorealistic home environments.

Dynalang's approach of learning a generative model of the world also enables additional capabilities, such as the ability to be pretrained on text-only data. This allows the agent to learn from offline datasets, and to generate language that is grounded in the environment it is operating in, similar to how humans learn language by experiencing the world around them. This grounding of language in the physical world is an important step towards more capable and versatile AI agents.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to language-enabled AI agents, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  • The evaluation is primarily focused on gameplay and navigation tasks. It would be valuable to see how Dynalang performs on a wider range of real-world tasks that require more diverse language understanding and interaction.
  • The ability to be pretrained on text-only data is promising, but the researchers don't explore how well this translates to actual real-world performance, especially when the agent needs to ground that language in a physical environment. Further research on bridging the "sim-to-real" gap would be valuable.
  • While Dynalang shows impressive results, it's unclear how it would scale to more complex environments and language interactions. Exploring the "language bottleneck" and ways to overcome it would be an important next step.

Overall, the Dynalang approach represents an exciting step towards more capable and versatile language-enabled AI agents, but there is still work to be done to fully realize the potential of this line of research.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel approach to building AI agents that can understand and use diverse language to interact with and model the world around them. By treating language as a signal that helps the agent predict future observations, state changes, and rewards, the researchers have developed an agent called Dynalang that can leverage a wide range of language inputs to excel at a variety of tasks.

The ability to learn from text-only data and generate grounded language is a particularly promising aspect of this work, as it suggests a path towards agents that can learn about the world through language alone, just as humans do. While there are still limitations and areas for further research, the Dynalang approach represents an important step forward in the field of language-enabled embodied AI.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

📈

Total Score

0

Learning to Model the World with Language

Jessy Lin, Yuqing Du, Olivia Watkins, Danijar Hafner, Pieter Abbeel, Dan Klein, Anca Dragan

To interact with humans and act in the world, agents need to understand the range of language that people use and relate it to the visual world. While current agents can learn to execute simple language instructions, we aim to build agents that leverage diverse language -- language like this button turns on the TV or I put the bowls away -- that conveys general knowledge, describes the state of the world, provides interactive feedback, and more. Our key idea is that agents should interpret such diverse language as a signal that helps them predict the future: what they will observe, how the world will behave, and which situations will be rewarded. This perspective unifies language understanding with future prediction as a powerful self-supervised learning objective. We instantiate this in Dynalang, an agent that learns a multimodal world model to predict future text and image representations, and learns to act from imagined model rollouts. While current methods that learn language-conditioned policies degrade in performance with more diverse types of language, we show that Dynalang learns to leverage environment descriptions, game rules, and instructions to excel on tasks ranging from game-playing to navigating photorealistic home scans. Finally, we show that our method enables additional capabilities due to learning a generative model: Dynalang can be pretrained on text-only data, enabling learning from offline datasets, and generate language grounded in an environment.

Read more

6/3/2024

Language-Guided World Models: A Model-Based Approach to AI Control
Total Score

0

Language-Guided World Models: A Model-Based Approach to AI Control

Alex Zhang, Khanh Nguyen, Jens Tuyls, Albert Lin, Karthik Narasimhan

This paper introduces the concept of Language-Guided World Models (LWMs) -- probabilistic models that can simulate environments by reading texts. Agents equipped with these models provide humans with more extensive and efficient control, allowing them to simultaneously alter agent behaviors in multiple tasks via natural verbal communication. In this work, we take initial steps in developing robust LWMs that can generalize to compositionally novel language descriptions. We design a challenging world modeling benchmark based on the game of MESSENGER (Hanjie et al., 2021), featuring evaluation settings that require varying degrees of compositional generalization. Our experiments reveal the lack of generalizability of the state-of-the-art Transformer model, as it offers marginal improvements in simulation quality over a no-text baseline. We devise a more robust model by fusing the Transformer with the EMMA attention mechanism (Hanjie et al., 2021). Our model substantially outperforms the Transformer and approaches the performance of a model with an oracle semantic parsing and grounding capability. To demonstrate the practicality of this model in improving AI safety and transparency, we simulate a scenario in which the model enables an agent to present plans to a human before execution, and to revise plans based on their language feedback.

Read more

9/6/2024

Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models
Total Score

0

Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models

Wenhao Lu, Xufeng Zhao, Josua Spisak, Jae Hee Lee, Stefan Wermter

Can emergent language models faithfully model the intelligence of decision-making agents? Though modern language models exhibit already some reasoning ability, and theoretically can potentially express any probable distribution over tokens, it remains underexplored how the world knowledge these pretrained models have memorized can be utilized to comprehend an agent's behaviour in the physical world. This study empirically examines, for the first time, how well large language models (LLMs) can build a mental model of agents, termed agent mental modelling, by reasoning about an agent's behaviour and its effect on states from agent interaction history. This research may unveil the potential of leveraging LLMs for elucidating RL agent behaviour, addressing a key challenge in eXplainable reinforcement learning (XRL). To this end, we propose specific evaluation metrics and test them on selected RL task datasets of varying complexity, reporting findings on agent mental model establishment. Our results disclose that LLMs are not yet capable of fully mental modelling agents through inference alone without further innovations. This work thus provides new insights into the capabilities and limitations of modern LLMs.

Read more

6/27/2024

Symbolic Learning Enables Self-Evolving Agents
Total Score

0

Symbolic Learning Enables Self-Evolving Agents

Wangchunshu Zhou, Yixin Ou, Shengwei Ding, Long Li, Jialong Wu, Tiannan Wang, Jiamin Chen, Shuai Wang, Xiaohua Xu, Ningyu Zhang, Huajun Chen, Yuchen Eleanor Jiang

The AI community has been exploring a pathway to artificial general intelligence (AGI) by developing language agents, which are complex large language models (LLMs) pipelines involving both prompting techniques and tool usage methods. While language agents have demonstrated impressive capabilities for many real-world tasks, a fundamental limitation of current language agents research is that they are model-centric, or engineering-centric. That's to say, the progress on prompts, tools, and pipelines of language agents requires substantial manual engineering efforts from human experts rather than automatically learning from data. We believe the transition from model-centric, or engineering-centric, to data-centric, i.e., the ability of language agents to autonomously learn and evolve in environments, is the key for them to possibly achieve AGI. In this work, we introduce agent symbolic learning, a systematic framework that enables language agents to optimize themselves on their own in a data-centric way using symbolic optimizers. Specifically, we consider agents as symbolic networks where learnable weights are defined by prompts, tools, and the way they are stacked together. Agent symbolic learning is designed to optimize the symbolic network within language agents by mimicking two fundamental algorithms in connectionist learning: back-propagation and gradient descent. Instead of dealing with numeric weights, agent symbolic learning works with natural language simulacrums of weights, loss, and gradients. We conduct proof-of-concept experiments on both standard benchmarks and complex real-world tasks and show that agent symbolic learning enables language agents to update themselves after being created and deployed in the wild, resulting in self-evolving agents.

Read more

6/27/2024