Diffusion of Thoughts: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Diffusion Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2402.07754 - Published 7/16/2024 by Jiacheng Ye, Shansan Gong, Liheng Chen, Lin Zheng, Jiahui Gao, Han Shi, Chuan Wu, Xin Jiang, Zhenguo Li, Wei Bi and 1 other
Total Score

0

💬

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Diffusion models have gained significant attention in text processing due to their potential advantages over conventional autoregressive models.
  • This paper proposes a novel approach called Diffusion-of-Thought (DoT), which integrates diffusion models with the Chain-of-Thought technique to improve the reasoning ability of language models.
  • DoT allows reasoning steps to diffuse over time, offering greater flexibility in balancing computation and reasoning performance.
  • Experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of DoT in tasks like multi-digit multiplication, boolean logic, and grade school math problems, where a small diffusion model outperforms a larger autoregressive model in both efficiency and accuracy.
  • DoT also showcases promising self-correction abilities and benefits from existing reasoning-enhancing techniques like self-consistency decoding.

Plain English Explanation

Diffusion models are a new type of machine learning technique that have gained popularity in the field of text processing. These models work differently than the more traditional autoregressive models, which make decisions one word at a time in a left-to-right manner.

In this paper, the researchers propose a new approach called Diffusion-of-Thought (DoT) that combines diffusion models with a technique called Chain-of-Thought. Chain-of-Thought is a way to improve the reasoning abilities of language models by having them go through a series of steps to solve a problem, rather than just outputting a single answer.

The key advantage of DoT is that it allows the reasoning steps to "diffuse" over time, rather than happening in a strict sequence. This gives the model more flexibility in how it approaches a problem and how it balances the amount of computation it needs to do with the quality of the final answer.

The researchers tested DoT on a variety of math and logic problems, and found that a small diffusion model using DoT was able to outperform a much larger autoregressive model in terms of both efficiency and accuracy. DoT also showed some promising abilities to self-correct and benefit from other techniques that enhance reasoning, like self-consistency decoding.

Overall, this research contributes to a better understanding of how diffusion models can be used for complex reasoning tasks, and provides a novel approach that may lead to more efficient and capable language models in the future.

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces Diffusion-of-Thought (DoT), a novel approach that integrates diffusion models with the Chain-of-Thought technique to enhance the reasoning ability of language models.

Unlike traditional autoregressive language models that make decisions in a left-to-right, token-by-token manner, DoT allows reasoning steps to diffuse over time through a diffusion language model. This offers greater flexibility in trading off computation for reasoning performance.

The researchers evaluated DoT on multi-digit multiplication, boolean logic, and grade school math problems. Their experiments showed that a small diffusion model using DoT was able to outperform a much larger autoregressive model in both efficiency and accuracy.

In addition, DoT demonstrated promising self-correction abilities and was able to benefit from existing reasoning-enhancing techniques, such as self-consistency decoding.

The findings of this work contribute to the understanding and development of reasoning with diffusion language models, building on previous research on abstraction-based reasoning and multi-step reasoning across languages.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling approach to integrating diffusion models with Chain-of-Thought, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:

  1. The evaluation was limited to a few specific tasks, and it would be valuable to see how DoT performs on a wider range of reasoning problems, including those that require more complex, multi-step reasoning.

  2. The paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms and dynamics of how the diffusion process enables more flexible reasoning compared to traditional autoregressive models. A more thorough analysis of these mechanisms could provide additional insights.

  3. While the results are promising, the paper does not fully address the potential trade-offs or challenges in scaling DoT to larger, more complex language models. Representational capacity and other architectural considerations may become more important as the models grow in size and complexity.

Overall, the Diffusion-of-Thought approach represents an innovative contribution to the field of language model reasoning, and the findings warrant further exploration and validation across a broader range of applications and settings.

Conclusion

This paper introduces Diffusion-of-Thought (DoT), a novel approach that integrates diffusion models with the Chain-of-Thought technique to enhance the reasoning ability of language models. By allowing reasoning steps to diffuse over time, DoT offers greater flexibility in balancing computation and reasoning performance.

The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of DoT in tasks like multi-digit multiplication, boolean logic, and grade school math problems, where a small diffusion model outperforms a much larger autoregressive model. DoT also showcases promising self-correction abilities and benefits from existing reasoning-enhancing techniques.

This research contributes to the understanding and development of reasoning with diffusion language models, opening up new possibilities for more efficient and capable language models that can tackle complex reasoning tasks. As the field continues to evolve, further exploration of the underlying mechanisms and scaling considerations of DoT will be valuable in realizing its full potential.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

💬

Total Score

0

Diffusion of Thoughts: Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Diffusion Language Models

Jiacheng Ye, Shansan Gong, Liheng Chen, Lin Zheng, Jiahui Gao, Han Shi, Chuan Wu, Xin Jiang, Zhenguo Li, Wei Bi, Lingpeng Kong

Recently, diffusion models have garnered significant interest in the field of text processing due to their many potential advantages compared to conventional autoregressive models. In this work, we propose Diffusion-of-Thought (DoT), a novel approach that integrates diffusion models with Chain-of-Thought, a well-established technique for improving the reasoning ability of autoregressive language models. In contrast to autoregressive language models that make decisions in a left-to-right, token-by-token manner, DoT allows reasoning steps to diffuse over time through a diffusion language model and offers greater flexibility in trading-off computation for reasoning performance. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of DoT in multi-digit multiplication, boolean logic, and grade school math problems, with a small diffusion model outperforming a much larger autoregressive model in both efficiency and accuracy. In addition to that, DoT showcases promising self-correction abilities and benefits from existing reasoning-enhancing techniques like self-consistency decoding. Our findings contribute to the understanding and development of reasoning with diffusion language models.

Read more

7/16/2024

On the Diagram of Thought
Total Score

0

New!On the Diagram of Thought

Yifan Zhang, Yang Yuan, Andrew Chi-Chih Yao

We introduce Diagram of Thought (DoT), a framework that models iterative reasoning in large language models (LLMs) as the construction of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) within a single model. Unlike traditional approaches that represent reasoning as linear chains or trees, DoT organizes propositions, critiques, refinements, and verifications into a cohesive DAG structure, allowing the model to explore complex reasoning pathways while maintaining logical consistency. Each node in the diagram corresponds to a proposition that has been proposed, critiqued, refined, or verified, enabling the LLM to iteratively improve its reasoning through natural language feedback. By leveraging auto-regressive next-token prediction with role-specific tokens, DoT facilitates seamless transitions between proposing ideas and critically evaluating them, providing richer feedback than binary signals. Furthermore, we formalize the DoT framework using Topos Theory, providing a mathematical foundation that ensures logical consistency and soundness in the reasoning process. This approach enhances both the training and inference processes within a single LLM, eliminating the need for multiple models or external control mechanisms. DoT offers a conceptual framework for designing next-generation reasoning-specialized models, emphasizing training efficiency, robust reasoning capabilities, and theoretical grounding. The code is available at https://github.com/diagram-of-thought/diagram-of-thought.

Read more

9/17/2024

Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also Think Step-by-Step
Total Score

0

Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation: Small Models Can Also Think Step-by-Step

Liunian Harold Li, Jack Hessel, Youngjae Yu, Xiang Ren, Kai-Wei Chang, Yejin Choi

Chain-of-thought prompting (e.g., Let's think step-by-step) primes large language models to verbalize rationalization for their predictions. While chain-of-thought can lead to dramatic performance gains, benefits appear to emerge only for sufficiently large models (beyond 50B parameters). We show that orders-of-magnitude smaller models (125M -- 1.3B parameters) can still benefit from chain-of-thought prompting. To achieve this, we introduce Symbolic Chain-of-Thought Distillation (SCoTD), a method to train a smaller student model on rationalizations sampled from a significantly larger teacher model. Experiments across several commonsense benchmarks show that: 1) SCoTD enhances the performance of the student model in both supervised and few-shot settings, and especially for challenge sets; 2) sampling many reasoning chains per instance from the teacher is paramount; and 3) after distillation, student chain-of-thoughts are judged by humans as comparable to the teacher, despite orders of magnitude fewer parameters. We test several hypotheses regarding what properties of chain-of-thought samples are important, e.g., diversity vs. teacher likelihood vs. open-endedness. We release our corpus of chain-of-thought samples and code.

Read more

4/17/2024

💬

Total Score

0

Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models

Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li

Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but the associated expensive API cost greatly limits the real application. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing API cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts(SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs with different scales for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost intuitive thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. We then design a confidence evaluator where the intuitive thoughts are cross-evaluated and introduce a controllable threshold mechanism to decide their mutual conflict. If these intuitive thoughts exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning results. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the API cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%.

Read more

8/27/2024