Discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression

Read original: arXiv:2406.03696 - Published 6/7/2024 by Jackie Lok, Rishi Sonthalia, Elizaveta Rebrova
Total Score

0

Discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This research paper examines the discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression.
  • It provides a theoretical analysis of the convergence behavior of mini-batch gradient descent, which is a widely used optimization algorithm in machine learning.
  • The paper derives explicit expressions for the evolution of the error dynamics and convergence rates, offering insights into the behavior of this algorithm.

Plain English Explanation

Mini-batch gradient descent is a popular optimization algorithm used in machine learning to train models, such as for linear regression. It works by repeatedly updating the model's parameters based on a small subset (mini-batch) of the training data, rather than the entire dataset at once.

This research paper takes a close look at how the error, or difference between the model's predictions and the true values, changes over time when using mini-batch gradient descent. The researchers derived mathematical equations that describe the evolution of this error. These equations provide insights into the algorithm's convergence behavior - how quickly the error decreases as the model is trained.

Understanding the error dynamics is important because it can help practitioners choose the right parameters, like the learning rate, to ensure the model converges efficiently. The analysis in this paper builds on previous work on gradient descent with noise injection and adaptive debiased SGD, offering a more detailed look at the specific case of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression.

Technical Explanation

The paper provides a rigorous mathematical analysis of the discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent applied to least squares regression problems. The key steps are:

  1. Deriving an explicit expression for the evolution of the error vector over the course of the optimization process. This involves analyzing how the error changes with each iteration of the mini-batch gradient descent algorithm.

  2. Using this error dynamic model to characterize the convergence rate of the algorithm. The researchers show that the convergence rate depends on properties of the data, such as the condition number of the feature covariance matrix.

  3. Extending the analysis to handle the case where the mini-batch size varies across iterations. This adds another layer of complexity to the error dynamics, but the authors are able to derive analogous convergence guarantees.

The technical analysis builds on prior work on understanding the behavior of stochastic gradient descent methods, adapting the techniques to the specific mini-batch setting. The results provide a deeper theoretical understanding of this widely-used optimization algorithm, with potential implications for high-dimensional regression and other machine learning applications.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough theoretical treatment of mini-batch gradient descent, but some caveats and limitations should be noted:

  • The analysis is restricted to the case of linear least squares regression, which may limit the direct applicability to more complex machine learning models and tasks.
  • The convergence rates derived in the paper depend on properties of the data, such as the condition number of the feature covariance matrix. In practice, these data properties may not be known a priori, which could complicate the use of these theoretical results.
  • The paper does not explore the empirical performance of mini-batch gradient descent in practical scenarios. While the theoretical analysis is insightful, it would be valuable to see how well the predicted convergence behavior aligns with experimental results.

Overall, this work contributes to our fundamental understanding of mini-batch gradient descent, but further research is needed to understand its behavior in a wider range of machine learning applications and settings.

Conclusion

This research paper provides a detailed theoretical analysis of the discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression. By deriving explicit expressions for the evolution of the error vector and characterizing the convergence rate, the authors offer valuable insights into the behavior of this widely-used optimization algorithm.

The results build on prior work in stochastic gradient descent and have the potential to inform the practical application of mini-batch gradient descent, particularly in terms of choosing appropriate algorithm parameters. While the analysis is limited to the linear regression setting, the techniques developed here could be extended to other machine learning models and tasks, contributing to a deeper understanding of optimization methods in the field.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression
Total Score

0

Discrete error dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression

Jackie Lok, Rishi Sonthalia, Elizaveta Rebrova

We study the discrete dynamics of mini-batch gradient descent for least squares regression when sampling without replacement. We show that the dynamics and generalization error of mini-batch gradient descent depends on a sample cross-covariance matrix $Z$ between the original features $X$ and a set of new features $widetilde{X}$, in which each feature is modified by the mini-batches that appear before it during the learning process in an averaged way. Using this representation, we rigorously establish that the dynamics of mini-batch and full-batch gradient descent agree up to leading order with respect to the step size using the linear scaling rule. We also study discretization effects that a continuous-time gradient flow analysis cannot detect, and show that mini-batch gradient descent converges to a step-size dependent solution, in contrast with full-batch gradient descent. Finally, we investigate the effects of batching, assuming a random matrix model, by using tools from free probability theory to numerically compute the spectrum of $Z$.

Read more

6/7/2024

Exact Mean Square Linear Stability Analysis for SGD
Total Score

0

Exact Mean Square Linear Stability Analysis for SGD

Rotem Mulayoff, Tomer Michaeli

The dynamical stability of optimization methods at the vicinity of minima of the loss has recently attracted significant attention. For gradient descent (GD), stable convergence is possible only to minima that are sufficiently flat w.r.t. the step size, and those have been linked with favorable properties of the trained model. However, while the stability threshold of GD is well-known, to date, no explicit expression has been derived for the exact threshold of stochastic GD (SGD). In this paper, we derive such a closed-form expression. Specifically, we provide an explicit condition on the step size that is both necessary and sufficient for the linear stability of SGD in the mean square sense. Our analysis sheds light on the precise role of the batch size $B$. In particular, we show that the stability threshold is monotonically non-decreasing in the batch size, which means that reducing the batch size can only decrease stability. Furthermore, we show that SGD's stability threshold is equivalent to that of a mixture process which takes in each iteration a full batch gradient step w.p. $1-p$, and a single sample gradient step w.p. $p$, where $p approx 1/B $. This indicates that even with moderate batch sizes, SGD's stability threshold is very close to that of GD's. We also prove simple necessary conditions for linear stability, which depend on the batch size, and are easier to compute than the precise threshold. Finally, we derive the asymptotic covariance of the dynamics around the minimum, and discuss its dependence on the learning rate. We validate our theoretical findings through experiments on the MNIST dataset.

Read more

6/18/2024

📉

Total Score

0

Learning with little mixing

Ingvar Ziemann, Stephen Tu

We study square loss in a realizable time-series framework with martingale difference noise. Our main result is a fast rate excess risk bound which shows that whenever a trajectory hypercontractivity condition holds, the risk of the least-squares estimator on dependent data matches the iid rate order-wise after a burn-in time. In comparison, many existing results in learning from dependent data have rates where the effective sample size is deflated by a factor of the mixing-time of the underlying process, even after the burn-in time. Furthermore, our results allow the covariate process to exhibit long range correlations which are substantially weaker than geometric ergodicity. We call this phenomenon learning with little mixing, and present several examples for when it occurs: bounded function classes for which the $L^2$ and $L^{2+epsilon}$ norms are equivalent, ergodic finite state Markov chains, various parametric models, and a broad family of infinite dimensional $ell^2(mathbb{N})$ ellipsoids. By instantiating our main result to system identification of nonlinear dynamics with generalized linear model transitions, we obtain a nearly minimax optimal excess risk bound after only a polynomial burn-in time.

Read more

6/14/2024

The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization
Total Score

0

The Sample Complexity of Gradient Descent in Stochastic Convex Optimization

Roi Livni

We analyze the sample complexity of full-batch Gradient Descent (GD) in the setup of non-smooth Stochastic Convex Optimization. We show that the generalization error of GD, with common choice of hyper-parameters, can be $tilde Theta(d/m + 1/sqrt{m})$, where $d$ is the dimension and $m$ is the sample size. This matches the sample complexity of emph{worst-case} empirical risk minimizers. That means that, in contrast with other algorithms, GD has no advantage over naive ERMs. Our bound follows from a new generalization bound that depends on both the dimension as well as the learning rate and number of iterations. Our bound also shows that, for general hyper-parameters, when the dimension is strictly larger than number of samples, $T=Omega(1/epsilon^4)$ iterations are necessary to avoid overfitting. This resolves an open problem by Schlisserman et al.23 and Amir er Al.21, and improves over previous lower bounds that demonstrated that the sample size must be at least square root of the dimension.

Read more

4/12/2024