Do pretrained Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent?
0
🚀
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Researchers investigate the connection between In-Context Learning (ICL) and Gradient Descent (GD) in large language models (LLMs)
- They highlight the limitations of prior studies that make their setup different from real-world LLM training
- They conduct empirical analyses on a pre-trained LLM (LLaMa-7B) to compare the behavior of ICL and GD
Plain English Explanation
In-Context Learning (ICL) is a fascinating phenomenon observed in large language models (LLMs), where the models can learn new tasks simply by being provided with a few examples or "demonstrations" of the task. This phenomenon has been the subject of several recent studies. Researchers have attempted to explain ICL by drawing connections to the well-known machine learning technique of Gradient Descent (GD).
However, the researchers in this study argue that the assumptions and setups used in prior work are quite different from how LLMs are actually trained in the real world. For example, previous studies used an "ICL objective" to train models explicitly for ICL, which is different from the natural emergence of ICL in pre-trained LLMs. They also point out that the theoretical hand-crafted weights used in these studies don't match the properties of real LLMs.
To better understand the connection between ICL and GD, the researchers conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis on a pre-trained LLM called LLaMa-7B. They compare the behavior of ICL and GD across various datasets, models, and numbers of demonstrations. Their findings suggest that ICL and GD modify the output distribution of language models differently, and the equivalence between the two remains an open hypothesis.
Technical Explanation
The researchers set out to investigate whether the theoretical connections between In-Context Learning (ICL) and Gradient Descent (GD) observed in prior studies hold up in actual pre-trained language models. They highlight several limiting assumptions in the previous work that make the experimental setup considerably different from the practical setup in which language models are trained in the real world.
For example, the prior studies used an "ICL objective" to train models explicitly for ICL, which is different from the emergent ICL behavior observed in pre-trained language models. Additionally, the theoretical hand-crafted weights used in these studies have properties that don't match those of real-world LLMs.
To explore the connection between ICL and GD in a more natural setting, the researchers conduct comprehensive empirical analyses on the LLaMa-7B language model, which was pre-trained on natural data. They compare the performance of ICL and GD across various datasets, models, and numbers of demonstrations, looking at three different metrics.
The results show that ICL and GD have different sensitivities to the order in which they observe demonstrations, and they modify the output distribution of language models in different ways. These findings suggest that the equivalence between ICL and GD remains an open hypothesis, and further studies are needed to fully understand the relationship between these two phenomena.
Critical Analysis
The researchers in this study have done an admirable job of highlighting the limitations of the prior work on the connection between In-Context Learning (ICL) and Gradient Descent (GD). By conducting empirical analyses on a real-world pre-trained language model (LLaMa-7B), they've uncovered important differences in the behavior of ICL and GD that call into question the validity of the theoretical equivalence proposed in earlier studies.
One key strength of this work is the researchers' attention to the practical realities of how language models are trained in the real world. By pointing out the discrepancies between the experimental setups used in prior studies and the actual training processes of LLMs, they've raised important concerns about the generalizability of those earlier findings.
However, it's worth noting that the researchers' own empirical analyses are also limited to a single language model (LLaMa-7B). While this model provides a more realistic testing ground than the theoretical constructs used in prior work, it would be valuable to see the same comparative analysis conducted on a wider range of pre-trained LLMs to further validate the conclusions.
Additionally, the researchers acknowledge that their findings suggest the equivalence between ICL and GD remains an "open hypothesis." This leaves room for future research to potentially uncover stronger connections between the two, or to identify additional factors that contribute to the observed differences in their behavior.
Conclusion
This study casts doubt on the theoretical connections between In-Context Learning (ICL) and Gradient Descent (GD) that have been proposed in recent research. By conducting empirical analyses on a real-world pre-trained language model, the researchers have shown that ICL and GD exhibit different sensitivities and modify the output distribution of the model in inconsistent ways.
These findings highlight the importance of studying the practical realities of how language models are trained and behave, rather than relying solely on theoretical frameworks. The researchers' work calls for further investigation into the nature of ICL and its relationship (or lack thereof) to well-established machine learning techniques like Gradient Descent.
As the field of large language models continues to rapidly evolve, studies like this one will be crucial in developing a deeper understanding of the inner workings of these powerful AI systems. By challenging existing assumptions and pushing the boundaries of our knowledge, researchers can help ensure that the development of LLMs is grounded in empirical evidence and a nuanced appreciation of their capabilities and limitations.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🚀
0
Do pretrained Transformers Learn In-Context by Gradient Descent?
Lingfeng Shen, Aayush Mishra, Daniel Khashabi
The emergence of In-Context Learning (ICL) in LLMs remains a remarkable phenomenon that is partially understood. To explain ICL, recent studies have created theoretical connections to Gradient Descent (GD). We ask, do such connections hold up in actual pre-trained language models? We highlight the limiting assumptions in prior works that make their setup considerably different from the practical setup in which language models are trained. For example, their experimental verification uses emph{ICL objective} (training models explicitly for ICL), which differs from the emergent ICL in the wild. Furthermore, the theoretical hand-constructed weights used in these studies have properties that don't match those of real LLMs. We also look for evidence in real models. We observe that ICL and GD have different sensitivity to the order in which they observe demonstrations. Finally, we probe and compare the ICL vs. GD hypothesis in a natural setting. We conduct comprehensive empirical analyses on language models pre-trained on natural data (LLaMa-7B). Our comparisons of three performance metrics highlight the inconsistent behavior of ICL and GD as a function of various factors such as datasets, models, and the number of demonstrations. We observe that ICL and GD modify the output distribution of language models differently. These results indicate that emph{the equivalence between ICL and GD remains an open hypothesis} and calls for further studies.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Exact Conversion of In-Context Learning to Model Weights
Brian K Chen, Tianyang Hu, Hui Jin, Hwee Kuan Lee, Kenji Kawaguchi
In-Context Learning (ICL) has been a powerful emergent property of large language models that has attracted increasing attention in recent years. In contrast to regular gradient-based learning, ICL is highly interpretable and does not require parameter updates. In this paper, we show that, for linearized transformer networks, ICL can be made explicit and permanent through the inclusion of bias terms. We mathematically demonstrate the equivalence between a model with ICL demonstration prompts and the same model with the additional bias terms. Our algorithm (ICLCA) allows for exact conversion in an inexpensive manner. Existing methods are not exact and require expensive parameter updates. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach through experiments that show the exact incorporation of ICL tokens into a linear transformer. We further suggest how our method can be adapted to achieve cheap approximate conversion of ICL tokens, even in regular transformer networks that are not linearized. Our experiments on GPT-2 show that, even though the conversion is only approximate, the model still gains valuable context from the included bias terms.
Read more6/7/2024
🛠️
0
Transformers Learn Higher-Order Optimization Methods for In-Context Learning: A Study with Linear Models
Deqing Fu, Tian-Qi Chen, Robin Jia, Vatsal Sharan
Transformers excel at in-context learning (ICL) -- learning from demonstrations without parameter updates -- but how they do so remains a mystery. Recent work suggests that Transformers may internally run Gradient Descent (GD), a first-order optimization method, to perform ICL. In this paper, we instead demonstrate that Transformers learn to approximate higher-order optimization methods for ICL. For in-context linear regression, Transformers share a similar convergence rate as Iterative Newton's Method; both are exponentially faster than GD. Empirically, predictions from successive Transformer layers closely match different iterations of Newton's Method linearly, with each middle layer roughly computing 3 iterations; thus, Transformers and Newton's method converge at roughly the same rate. In contrast, Gradient Descent converges exponentially more slowly. We also show that Transformers can learn in-context on ill-conditioned data, a setting where Gradient Descent struggles but Iterative Newton succeeds. Finally, to corroborate our empirical findings, we prove that Transformers can implement $k$ iterations of Newton's method with $k + mathcal{O}(1)$ layers.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Is In-Context Learning a Type of Gradient-Based Learning? Evidence from the Inverse Frequency Effect in Structural Priming
Zhenghao Zhou, Robert Frank, R. Thomas McCoy
Large language models (LLMs) have shown the emergent capability of in-context learning (ICL). One line of research has explained ICL as functionally performing gradient descent. In this paper, we introduce a new way of diagnosing whether ICL is functionally equivalent to gradient-based learning. Our approach is based on the inverse frequency effect (IFE) -- a phenomenon in which an error-driven learner is expected to show larger updates when trained on infrequent examples than frequent ones. The IFE has previously been studied in psycholinguistics because humans show this effect in the context of structural priming (the tendency for people to produce sentence structures they have encountered recently); the IFE has been used as evidence that human structural priming must involve error-driven learning mechanisms. In our experiments, we simulated structural priming within ICL and found that LLMs display the IFE, with the effect being stronger in larger models. We conclude that ICL is indeed a type of gradient-based learning, supporting the hypothesis that a gradient component is implicitly computed in the forward pass during ICL. Our results suggest that both humans and LLMs make use of gradient-based, error-driven processing mechanisms.
Read more6/27/2024