Does Instruction Tuning Make LLMs More Consistent?
2404.15206
0
0
Abstract
The purpose of instruction tuning is enabling zero-shot performance, but instruction tuning has also been shown to improve chain-of-thought reasoning and value alignment (Si et al., 2023). Here we consider the impact on $textit{consistency}$, i.e., the sensitivity of language models to small perturbations in the input. We compare 10 instruction-tuned LLaMA models to the original LLaMA-7b model and show that almost across-the-board they become more consistent, both in terms of their representations and their predictions in zero-shot and downstream tasks. We explain these improvements through mechanistic analyses of factual recall.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines whether instruction tuning, a technique used to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks, can also make these models more consistent in their outputs.
- Consistency is an important quality for LLMs, as it helps ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of their responses.
- The researchers use various datasets and metrics to evaluate the consistency of LLMs before and after instruction tuning, providing insights into the potential benefits and limitations of this approach.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, these models can sometimes be inconsistent, producing different responses to the same or similar prompts. This paper explores whether a technique called "instruction tuning" can help make LLMs more consistent.
Instruction tuning involves fine-tuning an LLM on a set of specific tasks or instructions, with the goal of improving its performance on those tasks. The researchers in this study wanted to see if this process could also make the LLM's outputs more reliable and predictable, even when it's not directly engaged in the tasks it was tuned on.
To test this, they used various datasets and metrics to measure the consistency of LLM responses before and after instruction tuning. For example, they might ask the model the same question multiple times and see how similar the answers are. They also looked at the model's ability to transfer its learned consistency to new, untrained tasks.
The results suggest that instruction tuning can indeed make LLMs more consistent, but the extent of the improvement depends on the specific model and the tasks it was tuned on. The researchers also found that the models' consistency was linked to their overall "psychometric" or predictive power, meaning that more consistent models tended to be better at tasks like answering questions accurately.
These findings have important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs, as consistency is a key factor in ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of these systems. The researchers also note that further work is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind instruction tuning and its effects on model consistency.
Technical Explanation
The paper investigates whether instruction tuning, a technique used to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks, can also make these models more consistent in their outputs. Consistency is an important quality for LLMs, as it helps ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of their responses.
The researchers used a variety of datasets and metrics to evaluate the consistency of LLMs before and after instruction tuning. For the datasets, they included a dataset for instruction following understanding, a dataset for cross-lingual transfer of instruction tuning, and a dataset for assessing the psychometric and predictive power of LLMs.
To measure consistency, the researchers looked at metrics such as the variance in model outputs for the same or similar inputs, the stability of the model's internal representations across prompts, and the model's ability to provide similar responses to the same query over multiple iterations. They also investigated whether instruction tuning on specific tasks could lead to more consistent performance on those tasks, as well as on unrelated, "zero-shot" tasks.
The results suggest that instruction tuning can indeed improve the consistency of LLMs, but the extent of the improvement depends on the specific model and the tasks it was tuned on. The researchers found that the models' consistency was linked to their overall "psychometric" or predictive power, meaning that more consistent models tended to be better at tasks like answering questions accurately.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a valuable contribution to the understanding of how instruction tuning can impact the consistency of large language models. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations to their research.
First, the study only evaluated a limited number of models and datasets, so the findings may not generalize to all LLMs or instructional tasks. Additional research is needed to further explore the effects of instruction tuning on a wider range of models and domains.
Second, the paper does not delve deeply into the underlying mechanisms that drive the improvements in consistency observed after instruction tuning. Understanding these mechanisms could lead to more targeted approaches for enhancing consistency in LLMs.
Additionally, the study focuses on consistency as a proxy for reliability and trustworthiness, but does not directly assess the real-world implications of these findings. Further research is needed to understand how improvements in consistency translate to the practical deployment of LLMs in various applications.
Overall, the paper provides a solid foundation for understanding the relationship between instruction tuning and LLM consistency, but there is still much work to be done to fully explore the potential benefits and limitations of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper explores whether instruction tuning, a technique used to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) on specific tasks, can also make these models more consistent in their outputs. Consistency is an important quality for LLMs, as it helps ensure the reliability and trustworthiness of their responses.
The researchers used a variety of datasets and metrics to evaluate the consistency of LLMs before and after instruction tuning. Their results suggest that instruction tuning can indeed improve the consistency of LLMs, but the extent of the improvement depends on the specific model and the tasks it was tuned on.
The findings have important implications for the development and deployment of LLMs, as consistency is a key factor in ensuring the reliability and trustworthiness of these systems. However, the authors acknowledge several caveats and limitations to their research, and suggest that further work is needed to better understand the mechanisms behind instruction tuning and its effects on model consistency.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
From Language Modeling to Instruction Following: Understanding the Behavior Shift in LLMs after Instruction Tuning
Xuansheng Wu, Wenlin Yao, Jianshu Chen, Xiaoman Pan, Xiaoyang Wang, Ninghao Liu, Dong Yu
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success, where instruction tuning is the critical step in aligning LLMs with user intentions. In this work, we investigate how the instruction tuning adjusts pre-trained models with a focus on intrinsic changes. Specifically, we first develop several local and global explanation methods, including a gradient-based method for input-output attribution, and techniques for interpreting patterns and concepts in self-attention and feed-forward layers. The impact of instruction tuning is then studied by comparing the explanations derived from the pre-trained and instruction-tuned models. This approach provides an internal perspective of the model shifts on a human-comprehensible level. Our findings reveal three significant impacts of instruction tuning: 1) It empowers LLMs to recognize the instruction parts of user prompts, and promotes the response generation constantly conditioned on the instructions. 2) It encourages the self-attention heads to capture more word-word relationships about instruction verbs. 3) It encourages the feed-forward networks to rotate their pre-trained knowledge toward user-oriented tasks. These insights contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of instruction tuning and lay the groundwork for future work that aims at explaining and optimizing LLMs for various applications. Our code and data are publicly available at https://github.com/JacksonWuxs/Interpret_Instruction_Tuning_LLMs.
4/5/2024
✅
Instruction Tuning With Loss Over Instructions
Zhengyan Shi, Adam X. Yang, Bin Wu, Laurence Aitchison, Emine Yilmaz, Aldo Lipani
0
0
Instruction tuning plays a crucial role in shaping the outputs of language models (LMs) to desired styles. In this work, we propose a simple yet effective method, Instruction Modelling (IM), which trains LMs by applying a loss function to the instruction and prompt part rather than solely to the output part. Through experiments across 21 diverse benchmarks, we show that, in many scenarios, IM can effectively improve the LM performance on both NLP tasks (e.g., MMLU, TruthfulQA, and HumanEval) and open-ended generation benchmarks (e.g., MT-Bench and AlpacaEval). Remarkably, in the most advantageous case, IM boosts model performance on AlpacaEval 1.0 by over 100%. We identify two key factors influencing the effectiveness of IM: (1) The ratio between instruction length and output length in the training data; and (2) The number of training examples. We observe that IM is especially beneficial when trained on datasets with lengthy instructions paired with brief outputs, or under the Superficial Alignment Hypothesis (SAH) where a small amount of training examples are used for instruction tuning. Further analysis substantiates our hypothesis that the improvement can be attributed to reduced overfitting to instruction tuning datasets. Our work provides practical guidance for instruction tuning LMs, especially in low-resource scenarios.
5/24/2024
Contrastive Instruction Tuning
Tianyi Lorena Yan, Fei Wang, James Y. Huang, Wenxuan Zhou, Fan Yin, Aram Galstyan, Wenpeng Yin, Muhao Chen
0
0
Instruction tuning has been used as a promising approach to improve the performance of large language models (LLMs) on unseen tasks. However, current LLMs exhibit limited robustness to unseen instructions, generating inconsistent outputs when the same instruction is phrased with slightly varied forms or language styles. This behavior indicates LLMs' lack of robustness to textual variations and generalizability to unseen instructions, potentially leading to trustworthiness issues. Accordingly, we propose Contrastive Instruction Tuning, which maximizes the similarity between the hidden representations of semantically equivalent instruction-instance pairs while minimizing the similarity between semantically different ones. To facilitate this approach, we augment the existing FLAN collection by paraphrasing task instructions. Experiments on the PromptBench benchmark show that CoIN consistently improves LLMs' robustness to unseen instructions with variations across character, word, sentence, and semantic levels by an average of +2.5% in accuracy. Code is available at https://github.com/luka-group/CoIN.
6/7/2024
Instruction-tuned Language Models are Better Knowledge Learners
Zhengbao Jiang, Zhiqing Sun, Weijia Shi, Pedro Rodriguez, Chunting Zhou, Graham Neubig, Xi Victoria Lin, Wen-tau Yih, Srinivasan Iyer
0
0
In order for large language model (LLM)-based assistants to effectively adapt to evolving information needs, it must be possible to update their factual knowledge through continued training on new data. The standard recipe for doing so involves continued pre-training on new documents followed by instruction-tuning on question-answer (QA) pairs. However, we find that LLMs trained with this recipe struggle to answer questions, even though the perplexity of documents is minimized. We found that QA pairs are generally straightforward, while documents are more complex, weaving many factual statements together in an intricate manner. Therefore, we hypothesize that it is beneficial to expose LLMs to QA pairs before continued pre-training on documents so that the process of encoding knowledge from complex documents takes into account how this knowledge is accessed through questions. Based on this, we propose pre-instruction-tuning (PIT), a method that instruction-tunes on questions prior to training on documents. This contrasts with standard instruction-tuning, which learns how to extract knowledge after training on documents. Extensive experiments and ablation studies demonstrate that pre-instruction-tuning significantly enhances the ability of LLMs to absorb knowledge from new documents, outperforming standard instruction-tuning by 17.8%.
5/28/2024