DORY: Deliberative Prompt Recovery for LLM
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces DORY, a novel technique for recovering the prompts used to generate text with large language models (LLMs).
- DORY leverages a "deliberative" approach, where the model iteratively refines its understanding of the original prompt through a series of prompting and output analysis steps.
- The goal is to enable better understanding, control, and safe deployment of LLMs by allowing users to extract the original prompts that generated specific model outputs.
Plain English Explanation
DORY is a new method for figuring out the original instructions (called "prompts") that were used to get a large language model to generate a particular piece of text. Large language models are AI systems that can write human-like text on a wide range of topics. However, it's often difficult to know exactly what prompts were used to get the model to produce a certain output.
The DORY technique works by having the model go through a back-and-forth process to gradually refine its understanding of the original prompt. It does this by analyzing the generated text, making guesses about the prompt, and then testing those guesses by having the model try to reproduce the original output. This iterative approach allows DORY to accurately recover the prompts used, which can be important for understanding how the model is being used and ensuring it is being deployed safely.
Technical Explanation
The core of the DORY technique is a "deliberative" process where the model iterates between generating text based on a hypothesized prompt and analyzing the generated output to refine its understanding of the original prompt. This is in contrast to prior work on prompt extraction and prompt regression, which used more direct inversion or optimization approaches.
DORY works by first having the model generate text based on an initial prompt guess. It then analyzes the generated text to evaluate how well the guess matched the original prompt. Based on this analysis, DORY iteratively refines the prompt guess, generating new text and analyzing it until the model converges on a prompt that can reliably reproduce the original output.
The authors demonstrate DORY's effectiveness on a variety of language models and prompts, showing that it can accurately recover prompts in most cases. They also discuss how DORY could be used for applications like prompt-driven safeguarding and prompt representation learning.
Critical Analysis
The DORY technique represents a significant advance in the ability to recover prompts used with large language models. By taking a more deliberative and iterative approach, it is able to overcome limitations of prior work that relied on more direct inversion or optimization.
That said, the authors acknowledge that DORY is not perfect and may struggle with certain types of prompts, especially those that are highly contextual or require significant world knowledge. There is also the potential for DORY to be used in adversarial ways, such as to extract sensitive information from language models.
Overall, the DORY technique is a valuable contribution to the emerging field of prompt engineering and is likely to have important implications for the responsible development and deployment of large language models.
Conclusion
The DORY technique introduced in this paper represents a significant step forward in the ability to recover the prompts used to generate text with large language models. By taking a deliberative, iterative approach, DORY can accurately uncover the original prompts in most cases, which could enable better understanding, control, and safe deployment of these powerful AI systems. While DORY is not perfect and raises some potential misuse concerns, it is an important advancement that is likely to have wide-ranging impacts on the field of language model research and application.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
DORY: Deliberative Prompt Recovery for LLM
Lirong Gao, Ru Peng, Yiming Zhang, Junbo Zhao
Prompt recovery in large language models (LLMs) is crucial for understanding how LLMs work and addressing concerns regarding privacy, copyright, etc. The trend towards inference-only APIs complicates this task by restricting access to essential outputs for recovery. To tackle this challenge, we extract prompt-related information from limited outputs and identify a strong(negative) correlation between output probability-based uncertainty and the success of prompt recovery. This finding led to the development of Deliberative PrOmpt RecoverY (DORY), our novel approach that leverages uncertainty to recover prompts accurately. DORY involves reconstructing drafts from outputs, refining these with hints, and filtering out noise based on uncertainty. Our evaluation across diverse LLMs and prompt benchmarks shows that DORY outperforms existing baselines, improving performance by approximately 10.82% and establishing a new state-of-the-art record in prompt recovery tasks. Significantly, DORY operates using a single LLM without any external resources or model, offering a cost-effective, user-friendly prompt recovery solution.
Read more6/10/2024
0
Uncovering Hidden Intentions: Exploring Prompt Recovery for Deeper Insights into Generated Texts
Louis Give, Timo Zaoral, Maria Antonietta Bruno
Today, the detection of AI-generated content is receiving more and more attention. Our idea is to go beyond detection and try to recover the prompt used to generate a text. This paper, to the best of our knowledge, introduces the first investigation in this particular domain without a closed set of tasks. Our goal is to study if this approach is promising. We experiment with zero-shot and few-shot in-context learning but also with LoRA fine-tuning. After that, we evaluate the benefits of using a semi-synthetic dataset. For this first study, we limit ourselves to text generated by a single model. The results show that it is possible to recover the original prompt with a reasonable degree of accuracy.
Read more6/26/2024
💬
0
On Prompt-Driven Safeguarding for Large Language Models
Chujie Zheng, Fan Yin, Hao Zhou, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Kai-Wei Chang, Minlie Huang, Nanyun Peng
Prepending model inputs with safety prompts is a common practice for safeguarding large language models (LLMs) against queries with harmful intents. However, the underlying working mechanisms of safety prompts have not been unraveled yet, restricting the possibility of automatically optimizing them to improve LLM safety. In this work, we investigate how LLMs' behavior (i.e., complying with or refusing user queries) is affected by safety prompts from the perspective of model representation. We find that in the representation space, the input queries are typically moved by safety prompts in a higher-refusal direction, in which models become more prone to refusing to provide assistance, even when the queries are harmless. On the other hand, LLMs are naturally capable of distinguishing harmful and harmless queries without safety prompts. Inspired by these findings, we propose a method for safety prompt optimization, namely DRO (Directed Representation Optimization). Treating a safety prompt as continuous, trainable embeddings, DRO learns to move the queries' representations along or opposite the refusal direction, depending on their harmfulness. Experiments with eight LLMs on out-of-domain and jailbreak benchmarks demonstrate that DRO remarkably improves the safeguarding performance of human-crafted safety prompts, without compromising the models' general performance.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Prompt Recursive Search: A Living Framework with Adaptive Growth in LLM Auto-Prompting
Xiangyu Zhao, Chengqian Ma
Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit remarkable proficiency in addressing a diverse array of tasks within the Natural Language Processing (NLP) domain, with various prompt design strategies significantly augmenting their capabilities. However, these prompts, while beneficial, each possess inherent limitations. The primary prompt design methodologies are twofold: The first, exemplified by the Chain of Thought (CoT), involves manually crafting prompts specific to individual datasets, hence termed Expert-Designed Prompts (EDPs). Once these prompts are established, they are unalterable, and their effectiveness is capped by the expertise of the human designers. When applied to LLMs, the static nature of EDPs results in a uniform approach to both simple and complex problems within the same dataset, leading to the inefficient use of tokens for straightforward issues. The second method involves prompts autonomously generated by the LLM, known as LLM-Derived Prompts (LDPs), which provide tailored solutions to specific problems, mitigating the limitations of EDPs. However, LDPs may encounter a decline in performance when tackling complex problems due to the potential for error accumulation during the solution planning process. To address these challenges, we have conceived a novel Prompt Recursive Search (PRS) framework that leverages the LLM to generate solutions specific to the problem, thereby conserving tokens. The framework incorporates an assessment of problem complexity and an adjustable structure, ensuring a reduction in the likelihood of errors. We have substantiated the efficacy of PRS framework through extensive experiments using LLMs with different numbers of parameters across a spectrum of datasets in various domains. Compared to the CoT method, the PRS method has increased the accuracy on the BBH dataset by 8% using Llama3-7B model, achieving a 22% improvement.
Read more8/6/2024