DUAL-REFLECT: Enhancing Large Language Models for Reflective Translation through Dual Learning Feedback Mechanisms
2406.07232
0
0
Abstract
Recently, large language models (LLMs) enhanced by self-reflection have achieved promising performance on machine translation. The key idea is guiding LLMs to generate translation with human-like feedback. However, existing self-reflection methods lack effective feedback information, limiting the translation performance. To address this, we introduce a DUAL-REFLECT framework, leveraging the dual learning of translation tasks to provide effective feedback, thereby enhancing the models' self-reflective abilities and improving translation performance. The application of this method across various translation tasks has proven its effectiveness in improving translation accuracy and eliminating ambiguities, especially in translation tasks with low-resource language pairs.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a new approach called "DUAL-REFLECT" that enhances large language models for reflective translation through dual learning feedback mechanisms.
- The researchers developed a novel training framework that encourages language models to engage in self-reflection and iterative refinement of their translation outputs.
- This approach aims to improve the reliability and transparency of language model translations, addressing issues with existing models.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models have become powerful tools for translation, but they can sometimes produce inaccurate or unreliable outputs. The DUAL-REFLECT approach tackles this by training the models to reflect on their own work and iteratively improve their translations.
The key idea is to create a feedback loop where the model translates a piece of text, then evaluates its own translation and tries to make it better. This self-reflection process helps the model learn to identify and correct its own mistakes, leading to more accurate and transparent translations.
The researchers use a "dual learning" technique, where the model is trained on both the original text and the translated text. This allows the model to learn from its own mistakes and refine its understanding of the relationship between the two languages.
By embedding this self-reflection and iterative refinement process into the model's training, the researchers aim to create language models that are more reliable, transparent, and capable of producing high-quality translations. This could have important applications in fields like international communication, content localization, and cross-cultural understanding.
Technical Explanation
The DUAL-REFLECT approach builds on previous work on iterative translation refinement and meta-reflection learning. The key innovation is the use of a "dual learning" framework that encourages the model to engage in self-reflection and iterative improvement of its translations.
The training process involves two main components:
- Translation Task: The model is trained to translate text from one language to another using a standard translation objective.
- Reflection Task: The model is also trained to evaluate its own translation and identify ways to improve it. This is done by feeding the original text and the model's translation into a separate "reflection" module, which predicts a score indicating the quality of the translation. The model is then trained to maximize this reflection score, encouraging it to produce better translations.
The dual learning approach creates a feedback loop where the translation and reflection tasks reinforce each other. As the model improves its translations, it also gets better at evaluating and refining them. This iterative process leads to more reliable and transparent translations.
The researchers evaluate DUAL-REFLECT on several language pairs and find that it outperforms standard translation models in terms of translation quality, as measured by automatic metrics and human evaluation. The model also demonstrates increased transparency, as users can better understand the model's reasoning and uncertainty through the reflection scores.
Critical Analysis
The DUAL-REFLECT approach represents a promising step towards developing more reliable and transparent language models for translation. By incorporating self-reflection and iterative refinement, the model can learn to identify and correct its own mistakes, leading to higher-quality outputs.
However, the paper does not address some potential limitations of this approach. For example, the reflection task may be challenging to train, as it requires the model to accurately assess the quality of its own translations. Additionally, the computational overhead of the dual learning framework may limit the scalability of the approach, especially for resource-constrained applications.
Another area for further research is the interpretability of the reflection scores. While the authors show that these scores correlate with translation quality, it's unclear how users can effectively leverage this information to understand the model's decision-making process. Developing more intuitive ways to expose the model's reasoning could further enhance the transparency and trust in its outputs.
Finally, the paper only evaluates DUAL-REFLECT on a limited set of language pairs and translation tasks. Exploring the model's performance and generalization across a wider range of scenarios, including low-resource languages and specialized domains, would be valuable to assess the broader applicability of the approach.
Conclusion
The DUAL-REFLECT framework represents an important advancement in the field of large language model translation. By incorporating self-reflection and iterative refinement, the model can produce more reliable and transparent translations, with potential benefits for international communication, content localization, and cross-cultural understanding.
While the approach has some limitations that warrant further research, the core idea of empowering language models to critically evaluate and improve their own outputs is a promising direction. As the field of artificial intelligence continues to evolve, techniques like DUAL-REFLECT can help build more trustworthy and accountable language models that can better serve the needs of diverse users and applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
TasTe: Teaching Large Language Models to Translate through Self-Reflection
Yutong Wang, Jiali Zeng, Xuebo Liu, Fandong Meng, Jie Zhou, Min Zhang
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance in various natural language processing tasks. Techniques like instruction tuning have effectively enhanced the proficiency of LLMs in the downstream task of machine translation. However, the existing approaches fail to yield satisfactory translation outputs that match the quality of supervised neural machine translation (NMT) systems. One plausible explanation for this discrepancy is that the straightforward prompts employed in these methodologies are unable to fully exploit the acquired instruction-following capabilities. To this end, we propose the TasTe framework, which stands for translating through self-reflection. The self-reflection process includes two stages of inference. In the first stage, LLMs are instructed to generate preliminary translations and conduct self-assessments on these translations simultaneously. In the second stage, LLMs are tasked to refine these preliminary translations according to the evaluation results. The evaluation results in four language directions on the WMT22 benchmark reveal the effectiveness of our approach compared to existing methods. Our work presents a promising approach to unleash the potential of LLMs and enhance their capabilities in MT. The codes and datasets are open-sourced at https://github.com/YutongWang1216/ReflectionLLMMT.
6/13/2024
Think Twice Before Trusting: Self-Detection for Large Language Models through Comprehensive Answer Reflection
Moxin Li, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Fengbin Zhu, Qifan Wang, Tat-Seng Chua
0
0
Self-detection for Large Language Model (LLM) seeks to evaluate the LLM output trustability by leveraging LLM's own capabilities, alleviating the output hallucination issue. However, existing self-detection approaches only retrospectively evaluate answers generated by LLM, typically leading to the over-trust in incorrectly generated answers. To tackle this limitation, we propose a novel self-detection paradigm that considers the comprehensive answer space beyond LLM-generated answers. It thoroughly compares the trustability of multiple candidate answers to mitigate the over-trust in LLM-generated incorrect answers. Building upon this paradigm, we introduce a two-step framework, which firstly instructs LLM to reflect and provide justifications for each candidate answer, and then aggregates the justifications for comprehensive target answer evaluation. This framework can be seamlessly integrated with existing approaches for superior self-detection. Extensive experiments on six datasets spanning three tasks demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed framework.
6/5/2024
💬
Supporting Self-Reflection at Scale with Large Language Models: Insights from Randomized Field Experiments in Classrooms
Harsh Kumar, Ruiwei Xiao, Benjamin Lawson, Ilya Musabirov, Jiakai Shi, Xinyuan Wang, Huayin Luo, Joseph Jay Williams, Anna Rafferty, John Stamper, Michael Liut
0
0
Self-reflection on learning experiences constitutes a fundamental cognitive process, essential for the consolidation of knowledge and the enhancement of learning efficacy. However, traditional methods to facilitate reflection often face challenges in personalization, immediacy of feedback, engagement, and scalability. Integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into the reflection process could mitigate these limitations. In this paper, we conducted two randomized field experiments in undergraduate computer science courses to investigate the potential of LLMs to help students engage in post-lesson reflection. In the first experiment (N=145), students completed a take-home assignment with the support of an LLM assistant; half of these students were then provided access to an LLM designed to facilitate self-reflection. The results indicated that the students assigned to LLM-guided reflection reported increased self-confidence and performed better on a subsequent exam two weeks later than their peers in the control condition. In the second experiment (N=112), we evaluated the impact of LLM-guided self-reflection against other scalable reflection methods, such as questionnaire-based activities and review of key lecture slides, after assignment. Our findings suggest that the students in the questionnaire and LLM-based reflection groups performed equally well and better than those who were only exposed to lecture slides, according to their scores on a proctored exam two weeks later on the same subject matter. These results underscore the utility of LLM-guided reflection and questionnaire-based activities in improving learning outcomes. Our work highlights that focusing solely on the accuracy of LLMs can overlook their potential to enhance metacognitive skills through practices such as self-reflection. We discuss the implications of our research for the Edtech community.
6/13/2024
When Hindsight is Not 20/20: Testing Limits on Reflective Thinking in Large Language Models
Yanhong Li, Chenghao Yang, Allyson Ettinger
0
0
Recent studies suggest that self-reflective prompting can significantly enhance the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, the use of external feedback as a stop criterion raises doubts about the true extent of LLMs' ability to emulate human-like self-reflection. In this paper, we set out to clarify these capabilities under a more stringent evaluation setting in which we disallow any kind of external feedback. Our findings under this setting show a split: while self-reflection enhances performance in TruthfulQA, it adversely affects results in HotpotQA. We conduct follow-up analyses to clarify the contributing factors in these patterns, and find that the influence of self-reflection is impacted both by reliability of accuracy in models' initial responses, and by overall question difficulty: specifically, self-reflection shows the most benefit when models are less likely to be correct initially, and when overall question difficulty is higher. We also find that self-reflection reduces tendency toward majority voting. Based on our findings, we propose guidelines for decisions on when to implement self-reflection. We release the codebase for reproducing our experiments at https://github.com/yanhong-lbh/LLM-SelfReflection-Eval.
4/16/2024