Dynamic Online Ensembles of Basis Expansions

Read original: arXiv:2405.01365 - Published 5/3/2024 by Daniel Waxman, Petar M. Djuri'c
Total Score

0

🎯

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • Practical Bayesian learning often requires online inference, dynamic models, and ensembling multiple models.
  • Recent advances have shown how to use random feature approximations for scalable, online ensembling of Gaussian processes with desirable theoretical properties and useful applications.
  • A key to these methods' success is the inclusion of a random walk on the model parameters, which makes the models dynamic.
  • These methods can be generalized to any basis expansion model, and using alternative basis expansions like Hilbert space Gaussian processes often improves performance.
  • The method's generality also allows ensembling of entirely different models, like a Gaussian process and polynomial regression.
  • A novel method is proposed to ensemble static and dynamic models together.

Plain English Explanation

Bayesian learning is a powerful approach that allows models to learn and adapt over time. However, putting this into practice often requires some tricky technical steps, like doing inference in an online (real-time) way, using dynamic models that can change over time, and combining multiple different models together.

Recent research has shown how to use a clever technique called "random feature approximations" to make this process much more scalable and efficient. The key is that they include a random walk on the model parameters, which allows the models to be dynamic and adapt over time. This works not just for Gaussian processes, but can be generalized to many different types of models.

One benefit is that you can easily combine multiple very different models, like a Gaussian process and a polynomial regression model. This "ensembling" of models can often lead to better overall performance. The researchers also propose a new way to combine static (fixed) and dynamic models together.

The overall result is a flexible and powerful framework for doing practical Bayesian learning that can handle a wide variety of real-world situations. By making models dynamic and allowing model combination, it opens up new possibilities for adaptive and high-performing machine learning systems.

Technical Explanation

The paper describes advances in techniques for Gaussian process ensembling that enable scalable, online Bayesian inference with desirable theoretical properties and useful applications.

A key innovation is the inclusion of a random walk on the model parameters, which makes the Gaussian process models dynamic and able to adapt over time. This is in contrast to traditional static Gaussian process models. The authors show how this technique can be generalized beyond just Gaussian processes to any basis expansion model.

By using random feature approximations, the models can be trained and updated efficiently in an online fashion. This allows the system to handle streaming data and adapt to changing environments. The authors demonstrate how this can be used to ensemble multiple Gaussian process models, as well as entirely different model types like Gaussian processes and polynomial regression.

Experiments show that using alternative basis expansions, such as Hilbert space Gaussian processes, often leads to improved performance compared to the standard Gaussian process formulation. The paper also proposes a novel method to ensemble static and dynamic models together, further expanding the flexibility of the approach.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling framework for scalable and adaptive Bayesian learning, with clear theoretical grounding and promising empirical results. However, a few potential limitations or areas for further research are worth noting:

  • The paper focuses on Gaussian processes and basis expansion models. It would be interesting to see how the techniques generalize to other model families, such as neural networks or deep learning models.
  • The experiments are conducted on relatively simple regression tasks. Applying the methods to more complex, high-dimensional problems could uncover additional challenges or opportunities.
  • While the ensembling of static and dynamic models is a novel contribution, the specific tradeoffs and optimal combination strategies are not explored in depth. Further research may be needed to fully understand this aspect.
  • The theoretical analysis centers on desired properties like consistency and regret bounds. Investigating the empirical calibration and uncertainty quantification of the models could provide additional insights.

Overall, this research represents an important step forward in Bayesian inference for overparameterized nonlinear regression, opening up new possibilities for adaptive and high-performing machine learning systems. Further exploration of the method's broader applicability and refinements to the ensembling approach could yield valuable advancements.

Conclusion

This paper presents a significant advancement in the field of practical Bayesian learning, introducing techniques that enable scalable, online inference with dynamic models and flexible model ensembling. By incorporating a random walk on model parameters, the authors show how Gaussian processes and other basis expansion models can be made adaptable to changing environments and data streams.

The ability to easily combine different model types, such as Gaussian processes and polynomial regression, is a particularly powerful feature that can lead to improved overall performance. The proposed method for ensembling static and dynamic models is a novel contribution that further expands the flexibility of the approach.

While the current experiments focus on regression tasks, the general framework has the potential for broader applications in areas like classification, time series analysis, and reinforcement learning. Extending the techniques to handle more complex, high-dimensional problems could uncover additional challenges and opportunities for continued research and development.

Overall, this work represents a significant step forward in making Bayesian learning more practical and accessible for real-world machine learning problems. The insights and methods presented here have the potential to drive further advancements in adaptive and high-performing AI systems.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🎯

Total Score

0

Dynamic Online Ensembles of Basis Expansions

Daniel Waxman, Petar M. Djuri'c

Practical Bayesian learning often requires (1) online inference, (2) dynamic models, and (3) ensembling over multiple different models. Recent advances have shown how to use random feature approximations to achieve scalable, online ensembling of Gaussian processes with desirable theoretical properties and fruitful applications. One key to these methods' success is the inclusion of a random walk on the model parameters, which makes models dynamic. We show that these methods can be generalized easily to any basis expansion model and that using alternative basis expansions, such as Hilbert space Gaussian processes, often results in better performance. To simplify the process of choosing a specific basis expansion, our method's generality also allows the ensembling of several entirely different models, for example, a Gaussian process and polynomial regression. Finally, we propose a novel method to ensemble static and dynamic models together.

Read more

5/3/2024

📶

Total Score

0

Sequential Bayesian Neural Subnetwork Ensembles

Sanket Jantre, Shrijita Bhattacharya, Nathan M. Urban, Byung-Jun Yoon, Tapabrata Maiti, Prasanna Balaprakash, Sandeep Madireddy

Deep ensembles have emerged as a powerful technique for improving predictive performance and enhancing model robustness across various applications by leveraging model diversity. However, traditional deep ensemble methods are often computationally expensive and rely on deterministic models, which may limit their flexibility. Additionally, while sparse subnetworks of dense models have shown promise in matching the performance of their dense counterparts and even enhancing robustness, existing methods for inducing sparsity typically incur training costs comparable to those of training a single dense model, as they either gradually prune the network during training or apply thresholding post-training. In light of these challenges, we propose an approach for sequential ensembling of dynamic Bayesian neural subnetworks that consistently maintains reduced model complexity throughout the training process while generating diverse ensembles in a single forward pass. Our approach involves an initial exploration phase to identify high-performing regions within the parameter space, followed by multiple exploitation phases that take advantage of the compactness of the sparse model. These exploitation phases quickly converge to different minima in the energy landscape, corresponding to high-performing subnetworks that together form a diverse and robust ensemble. We empirically demonstrate that our proposed approach outperforms traditional dense and sparse deterministic and Bayesian ensemble models in terms of prediction accuracy, uncertainty estimation, out-of-distribution detection, and adversarial robustness.

Read more

8/21/2024

🤯

Total Score

0

Gaussian Ensemble Belief Propagation for Efficient Inference in High-Dimensional Systems

Dan MacKinlay, Russell Tsuchida, Dan Pagendam, Petra Kuhnert

Efficient inference in high-dimensional models remains a central challenge in machine learning. This paper introduces the Gaussian Ensemble Belief Propagation (GEnBP) algorithm, a fusion of the Ensemble Kalman filter and Gaussian Belief Propagation (GaBP) methods. GEnBP updates ensembles by passing low-rank local messages over a graphical model. This combination inherits favourable qualities from each method. Ensemble techniques allow GEnBP to handle high-dimensional states, parameters and intricate, noisy, black-box generation processes. The use of local messages in a graphical model structure ensures that the approach can efficiently handle complex dependence structures. GEnBP is advantageous when the ensemble size may be considerably smaller than the inference dimension. This scenario often arises in fields such as spatiotemporal modelling, image processing and physical model inversion. GEnBP can be applied to general problem structures, including data assimilation, system identification and hierarchical models. Supporting code is available at https://github.com/danmackinlay/GEnBP

Read more

5/24/2024

Model Ensembling for Constrained Optimization
Total Score

0

Model Ensembling for Constrained Optimization

Ira Globus-Harris, Varun Gupta, Michael Kearns, Aaron Roth

There is a long history in machine learning of model ensembling, beginning with boosting and bagging and continuing to the present day. Much of this history has focused on combining models for classification and regression, but recently there is interest in more complex settings such as ensembling policies in reinforcement learning. Strong connections have also emerged between ensembling and multicalibration techniques. In this work, we further investigate these themes by considering a setting in which we wish to ensemble models for multidimensional output predictions that are in turn used for downstream optimization. More precisely, we imagine we are given a number of models mapping a state space to multidimensional real-valued predictions. These predictions form the coefficients of a linear objective that we would like to optimize under specified constraints. The fundamental question we address is how to improve and combine such models in a way that outperforms the best of them in the downstream optimization problem. We apply multicalibration techniques that lead to two provably efficient and convergent algorithms. The first of these (the white box approach) requires being given models that map states to output predictions, while the second (the emph{black box} approach) requires only policies (mappings from states to solutions to the optimization problem). For both, we provide convergence and utility guarantees. We conclude by investigating the performance and behavior of the two algorithms in a controlled experimental setting.

Read more

5/28/2024