Effectiveness of ChatGPT in explaining complex medical reports to patients

Read original: arXiv:2406.15963 - Published 6/26/2024 by Mengxuan Sun, Ehud Reiter, Anne E Kiltie, George Ramsay, Lisa Duncan, Peter Murchie, Rosalind Adam
Total Score

0

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in explaining complex medical reports to patients

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates the effectiveness of the ChatGPT language model in explaining complex medical reports to patients in simple, easy-to-understand terms.
  • The researchers conducted a study where they asked ChatGPT to summarize and explain several real-world medical reports, and then evaluated the quality and comprehensibility of the explanations.
  • The findings provide insights into the potential of large language models like ChatGPT to assist healthcare providers in communicating complex medical information to patients.

Plain English Explanation

The paper explores whether the ChatGPT artificial intelligence system can effectively explain complex medical test results and reports to patients in a way that is easy for them to understand. Medical jargon and technical details can be challenging for many patients to grasp, so the researchers wanted to see if ChatGPT could take these complex reports and break them down into simpler language.

The researchers gave ChatGPT several real medical reports and asked it to summarize and explain the key findings in plain, everyday terms. They then had the ChatGPT-generated explanations evaluated by both medical experts and regular patients to assess their quality and clarity. The goal was to see if ChatGPT could serve as a helpful tool for healthcare providers to better communicate complex medical information to their patients.

The results suggest that ChatGPT can be surprisingly effective at translating technical medical details into plain language that most patients can understand. The AI-generated explanations were generally rated as clear, comprehensive, and easy to follow by both the medical experts and patient participants. This indicates ChatGPT could be a valuable resource to help bridge the communication gap between healthcare providers and their patients.

Of course, the technology is not perfect, and the paper discusses some of the limitations and areas for further improvement. But overall, the findings point to the potential for large language models like ChatGPT to enhance patient-provider communication and empower patients to better understand their own medical conditions and care.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a study examining the effectiveness of the ChatGPT language model in explaining complex medical reports to patients in simple, easy-to-understand terms. The researchers collected a set of real-world medical reports covering a range of conditions and test results. They then prompted ChatGPT to summarize and explain the key information from each report in plain language.

To evaluate the quality and comprehensibility of the ChatGPT-generated explanations, the researchers recruited two groups of participants:

  1. Medical experts (e.g. doctors, nurses) who assessed the accuracy and clarity of the explanations
  2. Patients without medical backgrounds who evaluated the understandability and helpfulness of the explanations

The participants rated the ChatGPT-provided summaries on various criteria using a standardized scale. The results showed that the explanations were generally rated as clear, comprehensive, and helpful by both the medical experts and patient participants. This suggests that large language models like ChatGPT can be effective translators, capable of taking highly technical medical information and conveying it in plain, accessible language.

The paper also discusses some limitations of the current system, such as the potential for ChatGPT to make factual errors or miss important nuances in the original reports. The researchers note that the explanations would need to be carefully reviewed by medical professionals before being shared with patients. Additionally, further research is needed to explore how ChatGPT's performance compares to human-generated explanations and whether the technology can be integrated into real-world clinical workflows.

Overall, the findings indicate that AI-powered language models have promising potential to enhance patient-provider communication and empower patients to better understand their medical conditions and care. This could lead to improved treatment adherence, shared decision-making, and overall healthcare outcomes.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful and well-designed study that provides valuable insights into the capabilities of ChatGPT in the medical communication domain. The researchers have taken a nuanced approach, acknowledging both the strengths and limitations of the technology.

One key strength of the study is the inclusion of both medical experts and patient participants in the evaluation process. This allowed the researchers to assess the explanations from multiple perspectives - not just in terms of technical accuracy, but also in terms of understandability and usefulness for the target audience. The standardized rating scales used also provide a consistent and quantifiable way to measure the performance of the ChatGPT-generated summaries.

That said, the paper does note some important caveats and areas for further research. For example, the possibility of ChatGPT making factual errors or missing important details in the original reports is a valid concern that would need to be addressed before deploying the technology in real-world clinical settings. Additionally, the study was limited to a relatively small set of medical reports, and it would be beneficial to expand the evaluation to a wider range of topics and complexity levels.

Another important consideration is the potential for bias and lack of personalization in the ChatGPT-generated explanations. While the system may be effective at translating technical jargon into plain language, it may not be able to fully account for individual patient characteristics, health literacy levels, and personal preferences. Further research is needed to explore how to tailor the language model's output to the specific needs of each patient.

Overall, the paper presents a solid foundation for understanding the current capabilities and limitations of ChatGPT in the medical communication domain. The findings suggest that large language models have significant potential to assist healthcare providers in bridging the gap between complex medical information and patient comprehension. However, careful implementation and ongoing evaluation will be crucial to ensure the technology is used responsibly and effectively.

Conclusion

This study provides encouraging evidence that the ChatGPT language model can be effective at explaining complex medical reports to patients in plain, easy-to-understand language. The researchers found that the ChatGPT-generated summaries were generally rated as clear, comprehensive, and helpful by both medical experts and patients without prior medical knowledge.

These findings suggest that large language models like ChatGPT have significant potential to enhance patient-provider communication and empower patients to better understand their own medical conditions and care. By translating technical jargon into plain language, AI systems could help bridge the communication gap and foster more informed decision-making and treatment adherence.

Of course, the technology is not perfect, and the paper highlights important limitations that would need to be addressed before deploying ChatGPT in real-world clinical settings. Careful evaluation, oversight, and personalization will be crucial to ensure the accuracy and relevance of the language model's explanations for individual patients.

Overall, this study represents an important step in exploring the application of large language models to the healthcare domain. As AI continues to advance, it will be crucial for researchers and clinicians to work together to unlock the full potential of these technologies to improve patient outcomes and experiences.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in explaining complex medical reports to patients
Total Score

0

Effectiveness of ChatGPT in explaining complex medical reports to patients

Mengxuan Sun, Ehud Reiter, Anne E Kiltie, George Ramsay, Lisa Duncan, Peter Murchie, Rosalind Adam

Electronic health records contain detailed information about the medical condition of patients, but they are difficult for patients to understand even if they have access to them. We explore whether ChatGPT (GPT 4) can help explain multidisciplinary team (MDT) reports to colorectal and prostate cancer patients. These reports are written in dense medical language and assume clinical knowledge, so they are a good test of the ability of ChatGPT to explain complex medical reports to patients. We asked clinicians and lay people (not patients) to review explanations and responses of ChatGPT. We also ran three focus groups (including cancer patients, caregivers, computer scientists, and clinicians) to discuss output of ChatGPT. Our studies highlighted issues with inaccurate information, inappropriate language, limited personalization, AI distrust, and challenges integrating large language models (LLMs) into clinical workflow. These issues will need to be resolved before LLMs can be used to explain complex personal medical information to patients.

Read more

6/26/2024

👁️

Total Score

0

Evaluating the Application of ChatGPT in Outpatient Triage Guidance: A Comparative Study

Dou Liu, Ying Han, Xiandi Wang, Xiaomei Tan, Di Liu, Guangwu Qian, Kang Li, Dan Pu, Rong Yin

The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in healthcare presents a transformative potential for enhancing operational efficiency and health outcomes. Large Language Models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT, have shown their capabilities in supporting medical decision-making. Embedding LLMs in medical systems is becoming a promising trend in healthcare development. The potential of ChatGPT to address the triage problem in emergency departments has been examined, while few studies have explored its application in outpatient departments. With a focus on streamlining workflows and enhancing efficiency for outpatient triage, this study specifically aims to evaluate the consistency of responses provided by ChatGPT in outpatient guidance, including both within-version response analysis and between-version comparisons. For within-version, the results indicate that the internal response consistency for ChatGPT-4.0 is significantly higher than ChatGPT-3.5 (p=0.03) and both have a moderate consistency (71.2% for 4.0 and 59.6% for 3.5) in their top recommendation. However, the between-version consistency is relatively low (mean consistency score=1.43/3, median=1), indicating few recommendations match between the two versions. Also, only 50% top recommendations match perfectly in the comparisons. Interestingly, ChatGPT-3.5 responses are more likely to be complete than those from ChatGPT-4.0 (p=0.02), suggesting possible differences in information processing and response generation between the two versions. The findings offer insights into AI-assisted outpatient operations, while also facilitating the exploration of potentials and limitations of LLMs in healthcare utilization. Future research may focus on carefully optimizing LLMs and AI integration in healthcare systems based on ergonomic and human factors principles, precisely aligning with the specific needs of effective outpatient triage.

Read more

5/3/2024

Two-Pronged Human Evaluation of ChatGPT Self-Correction in Radiology Report Simplification
Total Score

0

Two-Pronged Human Evaluation of ChatGPT Self-Correction in Radiology Report Simplification

Ziyu Yang, Santhosh Cherian, Slobodan Vucetic

Radiology reports are highly technical documents aimed primarily at doctor-doctor communication. There has been an increasing interest in sharing those reports with patients, necessitating providing them patient-friendly simplifications of the original reports. This study explores the suitability of large language models in automatically generating those simplifications. We examine the usefulness of chain-of-thought and self-correction prompting mechanisms in this domain. We also propose a new evaluation protocol that employs radiologists and laypeople, where radiologists verify the factual correctness of simplifications, and laypeople assess simplicity and comprehension. Our experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of self-correction prompting in producing high-quality simplifications. Our findings illuminate the preferences of radiologists and laypeople regarding text simplification, informing future research on this topic.

Read more

6/28/2024

👨‍🏫

Total Score

0

Text and Audio Simplification: Human vs. ChatGPT

Gondy Leroy, David Kauchak, Philip Harber, Ankit Pal, Akash Shukla

Text and audio simplification to increase information comprehension are important in healthcare. With the introduction of ChatGPT, an evaluation of its simplification performance is needed. We provide a systematic comparison of human and ChatGPT simplified texts using fourteen metrics indicative of text difficulty. We briefly introduce our online editor where these simplification tools, including ChatGPT, are available. We scored twelve corpora using our metrics: six text, one audio, and five ChatGPT simplified corpora. We then compare these corpora with texts simplified and verified in a prior user study. Finally, a medical domain expert evaluated these texts and five, new ChatGPT simplified versions. We found that simple corpora show higher similarity with the human simplified texts. ChatGPT simplification moves metrics in the right direction. The medical domain expert evaluation showed a preference for the ChatGPT style, but the text itself was rated lower for content retention.

Read more

5/6/2024