Text and Audio Simplification: Human vs. ChatGPT

Overview

• The paper evaluates the text simplification performance of ChatGPT, a large language model, and compares it to human-simplified texts.
• They used 14 metrics to assess text difficulty across 12 corpora, including 6 text, 1 audio, and 5 ChatGPT-simplified corpora.
• The researchers also had a medical domain expert evaluate the ChatGPT-simplified texts and compare them to human-simplified versions.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers wanted to see how well ChatGPT, a popular AI language model, can simplify text to make it easier for people to understand. They looked at 12 different collections of text, some that were simplified by humans and others that were simplified by ChatGPT. They used 14 different measures to judge how difficult the texts were to read, like the length of words and sentences, the complexity of vocabulary, and other factors.

The researchers found that the texts simplified by humans were generally easier to read than the ones simplified by ChatGPT. However, the ChatGPT-simplified texts were still better than the original, unsimplified versions. The medical expert who reviewed the texts said they preferred the style of the ChatGPT-simplified versions, but thought the content was not as well retained compared to the human-simplified texts.

Overall, the research shows that while ChatGPT can simplify text to make it more understandable, human-simplified texts are still better at preserving the meaning and key information. But ChatGPT could still be a useful tool, especially for quickly simplifying text in areas like healthcare, where making information accessible is important.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a systematic comparison of the text simplification performance of ChatGPT, a large language model, against human-simplified texts. They used 14 different metrics to assess text difficulty, including factors like word and sentence length, vocabulary complexity, and readability scores.

The researchers evaluated 12 corpora in total: 6 text corpora, 1 audio corpus, and 5 corpora where the original texts were simplified using ChatGPT. They compared these to texts that had been simplified and verified by humans in a prior user study.

Additionally, a medical domain expert reviewed the ChatGPT-simplified texts as well as 5 new ChatGPT-simplified versions, and provided their assessment of the content retention and overall quality compared to the human-simplified texts.

The results showed that the simple corpora (i.e., those simplified by humans) had higher similarity to the human-simplified texts across the 14 metrics. However, the ChatGPT simplification did move the metrics in the desired direction, making the texts easier to read.

The medical expert evaluation found a preference for the ChatGPT style, but the content retention was rated lower compared to the human-simplified versions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable comparison of ChatGPT's text simplification capabilities against human-simplified texts, which is an important step in understanding the strengths and limitations of this powerful language model.

One limitation mentioned in the paper is the relatively small number of corpora evaluated, particularly for the ChatGPT-simplified texts. Expanding the dataset could lead to more robust and generalizable findings.

Additionally, the researchers note that the medical expert evaluation was limited to a small number of texts. Conducting a larger-scale user study with a diverse set of participants could provide more comprehensive insights into the real-world usability and comprehension of the simplified texts.

It would also be interesting to see how ChatGPT's simplification performance compares to other text simplification approaches, such as traditional readability formulas or other AI-driven techniques. This could help situate ChatGPT's capabilities within the broader landscape of text simplification tools.

Overall, this research contributes valuable empirical evidence on the strengths and limitations of ChatGPT's text simplification, which could inform the development of more effective language models and text simplification techniques, especially in domains like healthcare where clear communication is critical.

Conclusion

This paper provides a detailed evaluation of ChatGPT's text simplification performance compared to human-simplified texts. The researchers found that while ChatGPT can simplify text in a way that makes it more readable, human-simplified texts still outperform in terms of content retention and overall quality.

The insights from this study could inform the development of more effective text simplification tools, including ways to leverage the strengths of both human and AI-driven approaches. As large language models like ChatGPT continue to advance, understanding their capabilities and limitations in specific applications, such as healthcare communication, will be crucial for ensuring they are used responsibly and effectively.