An Empirical Study into Clustering of Unseen Datasets with Self-Supervised Encoders
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents an empirical study on the ability of self-supervised encoders to cluster unseen datasets.
- The researchers investigate how well self-supervised encoders, which are trained on one dataset, can be used to cluster data from completely different, unseen datasets.
- They compare the performance of various self-supervised learning methods and find that they can outperform traditional clustering approaches on certain unseen datasets.
Plain English Explanation
Self-supervised learning is a type of machine learning where the model learns useful representations of data without being explicitly told the answers. These learned representations can then be used for a variety of tasks, like clustering data into groups.
In this study, the researchers wanted to see how well self-supervised encoders, which are models trained using self-supervised learning, could cluster datasets that the models had never seen before. They compared the performance of different self-supervised learning methods on this task and found that in some cases, the self-supervised encoders were better at clustering the unseen data than traditional clustering algorithms.
The key insight is that self-supervised learning can capture general patterns in data that are useful for tasks like clustering, even when the data is quite different from what the model was trained on originally. This suggests that self-supervised encoders could be a powerful tool for working with new, unknown datasets, since they can adapt to find meaningful structure without needing to be retrained from scratch.
Technical Explanation
The paper evaluates the ability of self-supervised encoders, trained on one dataset, to cluster data from completely different, "unseen" datasets. The researchers compare the performance of various self-supervised learning methods, including SimCLR, BYOL, and SwAV, against traditional clustering approaches.
The key experimental design involves training self-supervised encoders on one dataset, such as ImageNet, and then evaluating their ability to cluster data from other datasets, like CIFAR-10 or STL-10, without any fine-tuning. The paper provides detailed comparisons of the clustering performance using metrics like Normalized Mutual Information (NMI) and Adjusted Rand Index (ARI).
The results show that in many cases, the self-supervised encoders are able to outperform standard clustering methods like K-Means on the unseen datasets. The researchers attribute this to the self-supervised models' ability to learn general data representations that are transferable to new domains. This aligns with insights from other work on the benefits of self-supervised learning and its applications in low-data regimes.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough empirical evaluation of self-supervised encoders for clustering unseen datasets, but there are a few areas that could use further exploration:
- The study is limited to image datasets, and it would be valuable to see how the findings extend to other data modalities, such as text or audio.
- The paper does not delve into the underlying reasons why certain self-supervised methods outperform others on the unseen clustering task. A review of discriminative self-supervised learning methods could provide additional insights on this.
- While the results are promising, the paper does not address the computational and memory requirements of the self-supervised encoders, which could be a practical concern for real-world deployment.
Overall, this study offers valuable evidence for the versatility of self-supervised learning and its potential applications in working with new, unknown datasets. However, further research is needed to fully understand the limits and tradeoffs of this approach.
Conclusion
This paper presents an empirical investigation into the ability of self-supervised encoders to cluster unseen datasets. The key finding is that self-supervised learning methods can often outperform traditional clustering approaches when applied to datasets that are completely different from the one used to train the original model.
This suggests that self-supervised encoders can learn general data representations that are transferable to new domains, making them a potentially powerful tool for working with unknown or novel datasets. While the study is limited to image data, the insights could have broader implications for how we approach machine learning tasks in data-scarce or constantly evolving environments.
As self-supervised learning continues to advance, this type of cross-domain clustering ability could become increasingly valuable, allowing us to gain insights from data without the need for extensive manual labeling or retraining. Overall, this research contributes to our understanding of the capabilities and potential applications of self-supervised learning.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
An Empirical Study into Clustering of Unseen Datasets with Self-Supervised Encoders
Scott C. Lowe, Joakim Bruslund Haurum, Sageev Oore, Thomas B. Moeslund, Graham W. Taylor
Can pretrained models generalize to new datasets without any retraining? We deploy pretrained image models on datasets they were not trained for, and investigate whether their embeddings form meaningful clusters. Our suite of benchmarking experiments use encoders pretrained solely on ImageNet-1k with either supervised or self-supervised training techniques, deployed on image datasets that were not seen during training, and clustered with conventional clustering algorithms. This evaluation provides new insights into the embeddings of self-supervised models, which prioritize different features to supervised models. Supervised encoders typically offer more utility than SSL encoders within the training domain, and vice-versa far outside of it, however, fine-tuned encoders demonstrate the opposite trend. Clustering provides a way to evaluate the utility of self-supervised learned representations orthogonal to existing methods such as kNN. Additionally, we find the silhouette score when measured in a UMAP-reduced space is highly correlated with clustering performance, and can therefore be used as a proxy for clustering performance on data with no ground truth labels. Our code implementation is available at url{https://github.com/scottclowe/zs-ssl-clustering/}.
Read more6/5/2024
0
Label-free Monitoring of Self-Supervised Learning Progress
Isaac Xu, Scott Lowe, Thomas Trappenberg
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is an effective method for exploiting unlabelled data to learn a high-level embedding space that can be used for various downstream tasks. However, existing methods to monitor the quality of the encoder -- either during training for one model or to compare several trained models -- still rely on access to annotated data. When SSL methodologies are applied to new data domains, a sufficiently large labelled dataset may not always be available. In this study, we propose several evaluation metrics which can be applied on the embeddings of unlabelled data and investigate their viability by comparing them to linear probe accuracy (a common metric which utilizes an annotated dataset). In particular, we apply $k$-means clustering and measure the clustering quality with the silhouette score and clustering agreement. We also measure the entropy of the embedding distribution. We find that while the clusters did correspond better to the ground truth annotations as training of the network progressed, label-free clustering metrics correlated with the linear probe accuracy only when training with SSL methods SimCLR and MoCo-v2, but not with SimSiam. Additionally, although entropy did not always have strong correlations with LP accuracy, this appears to be due to instability arising from early training, with the metric stabilizing and becoming more reliable at later stages of learning. Furthermore, while entropy generally decreases as learning progresses, this trend reverses for SimSiam. More research is required to establish the cause for this unexpected behaviour. Lastly, we find that while clustering based approaches are likely only viable for same-architecture comparisons, entropy may be architecture-independent.
Read more9/11/2024
0
A Closer Look at Benchmarking Self-Supervised Pre-training with Image Classification
Markus Marks, Manuel Knott, Neehar Kondapaneni, Elijah Cole, Thijs Defraeye, Fernando Perez-Cruz, Pietro Perona
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a machine learning approach where the data itself provides supervision, eliminating the need for external labels. The model is forced to learn about the data structure or context by solving a pretext task. With SSL, models can learn from abundant and cheap unlabeled data, significantly reducing the cost of training models where labels are expensive or inaccessible. In Computer Vision, SSL is widely used as pre-training followed by a downstream task, such as supervised transfer, few-shot learning on smaller labeled data sets, and/or unsupervised clustering. Unfortunately, it is infeasible to evaluate SSL methods on all possible downstream tasks and objectively measure the quality of the learned representation. Instead, SSL methods are evaluated using in-domain evaluation protocols, such as fine-tuning, linear probing, and k-nearest neighbors (kNN). However, it is not well understood how well these evaluation protocols estimate the representation quality of a pre-trained model for different downstream tasks under different conditions, such as dataset, metric, and model architecture. We study how classification-based evaluation protocols for SSL correlate and how well they predict downstream performance on different dataset types. Our study includes eleven common image datasets and 26 models that were pre-trained with different SSL methods or have different model backbones. We find that in-domain linear/kNN probing protocols are, on average, the best general predictors for out-of-domain performance. We further investigate the importance of batch normalization and evaluate how robust correlations are for different kinds of dataset domain shifts. We challenge assumptions about the relationship between discriminative and generative self-supervised methods, finding that most of their performance differences can be explained by changes to model backbones.
Read more7/19/2024
0
Image Clustering Algorithm Based on Self-Supervised Pretrained Models and Latent Feature Distribution Optimization
Qiuyu Zhu, Liheng Hu, Sijin Wang
In the face of complex natural images, existing deep clustering algorithms fall significantly short in terms of clustering accuracy when compared to supervised classification methods, making them less practical. This paper introduces an image clustering algorithm based on self-supervised pretrained models and latent feature distribution optimization, substantially enhancing clustering performance. It is found that: (1) For complex natural images, we effectively enhance the discriminative power of latent features by leveraging self-supervised pretrained models and their fine-tuning, resulting in improved clustering performance. (2) In the latent feature space, by searching for k-nearest neighbor images for each training sample and shortening the distance between the training sample and its nearest neighbor, the discriminative power of latent features can be further enhanced, and clustering performance can be improved. (3) In the latent feature space, reducing the distance between sample features and the nearest predefined cluster centroids can optimize the distribution of latent features, therefore further improving clustering performance. Through experiments on multiple datasets, our approach outperforms the latest clustering algorithms and achieves state-of-the-art clustering results. When the number of categories in the datasets is small, such as CIFAR-10 and STL-10, and there are significant differences between categories, our clustering algorithm has similar accuracy to supervised methods without using pretrained models, slightly lower than supervised methods using pre-trained models. The code linked algorithm is https://github.com/LihengHu/semi.
Read more8/13/2024