Enhancing the Code Debugging Ability of LLMs via Communicative Agent Based Data Refinement
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores methods to enhance the code debugging ability of large language models (LLMs).
- The authors propose a communicative agent-based data refinement approach to improve LLM performance on code debugging tasks.
- The key idea is to have LLMs collaborate with a specialized agent that can provide targeted feedback and guidance to refine the model's code understanding.
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on improving the ability of large language models to debug code. The researchers developed a system where the language model works together with a specialized "agent" that can provide feedback and guidance to help the model better understand and fix code issues.
The main insight is that language models, while powerful, may struggle with certain technical tasks like code debugging. By having the model collaborate with a dedicated agent that understands code more deeply, the researchers were able to enhance the model's code debugging capabilities. The agent can analyze the code, identify problems, and provide targeted suggestions to the language model to improve its performance.
This collaborative approach aims to leverage the strengths of both the language model (natural language understanding) and the specialized agent (code expertise) to create a more effective code debugging system. The key is the back-and-forth interaction between the two, with the agent refining the model's knowledge to help it better tackle code-related challenges.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a communicative agent-based data refinement approach to enhance the code debugging capabilities of LLMs. The core idea is to have the LLM collaborate with a specialized agent that can provide targeted feedback and guidance to refine the model's understanding of code.
The system consists of two main components:
- LLM: The large language model responsible for natural language understanding and generation tasks related to code debugging.
- Communicative Agent: A dedicated agent that can analyze code, identify issues, and provide detailed feedback to the LLM to help improve its code debugging abilities.
During the refinement process, the LLM and the agent engage in a back-and-forth communication loop. The LLM first attempts to debug a given code snippet, and the agent then analyzes the LLM's response. The agent provides targeted feedback to the LLM, highlighting areas where its understanding can be improved. The LLM then incorporates this feedback to refine its code debugging abilities, and the cycle continues.
The authors evaluate their approach on a range of code debugging tasks and demonstrate significant performance improvements compared to standalone LLMs. The communicative agent-based data refinement method allows the LLM to gradually learn from the agent's expertise, leading to enhanced code debugging capabilities.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach to improving the code debugging abilities of LLMs. The key strength of the proposed method is its ability to leverage the complementary strengths of the language model and the specialized agent.
However, the authors acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:
-
Scalability: The effectiveness of the communicative agent-based approach may be constrained by the scalability of the specialized agent component. As the complexity of code debugging tasks increases, the agent's ability to provide comprehensive and accurate feedback could become a bottleneck.
-
Generalization: The paper focuses on evaluating the system's performance on a specific set of code debugging tasks. It remains to be seen how well the approach can generalize to a broader range of code-related challenges, such as code editing or code generation.
-
Interpretability: The paper does not delve into the interpretability of the LLM's code debugging process. Understanding the model's reasoning and decision-making would be crucial for developers to trust and effectively utilize the system.
Future research could explore ways to address these limitations, such as developing more scalable and generalizable agent architectures or incorporating interpretability mechanisms into the model.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to enhancing the code debugging capabilities of large language models by leveraging a communicative agent-based data refinement system. The key insight is to have the LLM collaborate with a specialized agent that can provide targeted feedback and guidance to improve the model's understanding of code.
The proposed method demonstrates significant performance improvements on code debugging tasks, suggesting that the synergistic interaction between the language model and the code-aware agent can be a fruitful direction for advancing the field of code-related AI capabilities. As the applications of LLMs continue to expand, developing techniques to enhance their technical skills, such as code debugging, will be crucial for unlocking their full potential in real-world software engineering and development scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Enhancing the Code Debugging Ability of LLMs via Communicative Agent Based Data Refinement
Weiqing Yang, Hanbin Wang, Zhenghao Liu, Xinze Li, Yukun Yan, Shuo Wang, Yu Gu, Minghe Yu, Zhiyuan Liu, Ge Yu
Debugging is a vital aspect of software development, yet the debugging capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) remain largely unexplored. This paper first introduces DEBUGEVAL, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the debugging capabilities of LLMs. DEBUGEVAL collects data from existing high-quality datasets and designs four different tasks to evaluate the debugging effectiveness, including BUG Localization, BUG Identification, Code Review, and Code Repair. Additionally, to enhance the code debugging ability of LLMs, this paper proposes a CoMmunicative Agent BaSed DaTa REfinement FRamework (MASTER), which generates the refined code debugging data for supervised finetuning. Specifically, MASTER employs the Code Quizzer to generate refined data according to the defined tasks of DEBUGEVAL. Then the Code Learner acts as a critic and reserves the generated problems that it can not solve. Finally, the Code Teacher provides a detailed Chain-of-Thought based solution to deal with the generated problem. We collect the synthesized data and finetune the Code Learner to enhance the debugging ability and conduct the NeuDebugger model. Our experiments evaluate various LLMs and NeuDebugger in the zero-shot setting on DEBUGEVAL. Experimental results demonstrate that these 7B-scale LLMs have weaker debugging capabilities, even these code-oriented LLMs. On the contrary, these larger models (over 70B) show convincing debugging ability. Our further analyses illustrate that MASTER is an effective method to enhance the code debugging ability by synthesizing data for Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) LLMs.
Read more8/12/2024
💬
0
DebugBench: Evaluating Debugging Capability of Large Language Models
Runchu Tian, Yining Ye, Yujia Qin, Xin Cong, Yankai Lin, Yinxu Pan, Yesai Wu, Haotian Hui, Weichuan Liu, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional coding capability. However, as another critical component of programming proficiency, the debugging capability of LLMs remains relatively unexplored. Previous evaluations of LLMs' debugging ability are significantly limited by the risk of data leakage, the scale of the dataset, and the variety of tested bugs. To overcome these deficiencies, we introduce `DebugBench', an LLM debugging benchmark consisting of 4,253 instances. It covers four major bug categories and 18 minor types in C++, Java, and Python. To construct DebugBench, we collect code snippets from the LeetCode community, implant bugs into source data with GPT-4, and assure rigorous quality checks. We evaluate two commercial and four open-source models in a zero-shot scenario. We find that (1) while closed-source models exhibit inferior debugging performance compared to humans, open-source models relatively lower pass rate scores; (2) the complexity of debugging notably fluctuates depending on the bug category; (3) incorporating runtime feedback has a clear impact on debugging performance which is not always helpful. As an extension, we also compare LLM debugging and code generation, revealing a strong correlation between them for closed-source models. These findings will benefit the development of LLMs in debugging.
Read more6/7/2024
0
Training LLMs to Better Self-Debug and Explain Code
Nan Jiang, Xiaopeng Li, Shiqi Wang, Qiang Zhou, Soneya Binta Hossain, Baishakhi Ray, Varun Kumar, Xiaofei Ma, Anoop Deoras
In the domain of code generation, self-debugging is crucial. It allows LLMs to refine their generated code based on execution feedback. This is particularly important because generating correct solutions in one attempt proves challenging for complex tasks. Prior works on self-debugging mostly focus on prompting methods by providing LLMs with few-shot examples, which work poorly on small open-sourced LLMs. In this work, we propose a training framework that significantly improves self-debugging capability of LLMs. Intuitively, we observe that a chain of explanations on the wrong code followed by code refinement helps LLMs better analyze the wrong code and do refinement. We thus propose an automated pipeline to collect a high-quality dataset for code explanation and refinement by generating a number of explanations and refinement trajectories and filtering via execution verification. We perform supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and further reinforcement learning (RL) on both success and failure trajectories with a novel reward design considering code explanation and refinement quality. SFT improves the pass@1 by up to 15.92% and pass@10 by 9.30% over four benchmarks. RL training brings additional up to 3.54% improvement on pass@1 and 2.55% improvement on pass@10. The trained LLMs show iterative refinement ability, and can keep refining code continuously. Lastly, our human evaluation shows that the LLMs trained with our framework generate more useful code explanations and help developers better understand bugs in source code.
Read more5/30/2024
0
LDB: A Large Language Model Debugger via Verifying Runtime Execution Step-by-step
Lily Zhong, Zilong Wang, Jingbo Shang
Large language models (LLMs) are leading significant progress in code generation. Beyond one-pass code generation, recent works further integrate unit tests and program verifiers into LLMs to iteratively refine the generated programs. However, these works consider the generated programs as an indivisible entity, which falls short for LLMs in debugging the programs, especially when the programs contain complex logic flows and data operations. In contrast, when human developers debug programs, they typically set breakpoints and selectively examine runtime execution information. The execution flow and the intermediate variables play a crucial role in the debugging process, yet they are underutilized in the existing literature on code generation. In this study, we introduce Large Language Model Debugger (LDB), a novel debugging framework that enables LLMs to refine their generated programs with the runtime execution information. Specifically, LDB segments the programs into basic blocks and tracks the values of intermediate variables after each block throughout the runtime execution. This allows LLMs to concentrate on simpler code units within the overall execution flow, verify their correctness against the task description block by block, and efficiently pinpoint any potential errors. Experiments demonstrate that LDB consistently enhances the baseline performance by up to 9.8% across the HumanEval, MBPP, and TransCoder benchmarks, archiving new state-of-the-art performance in code debugging for various LLM selections.
Read more6/5/2024