Enhancing Efficiency of Safe Reinforcement Learning via Sample Manipulation
2405.20860
0
0
Abstract
Safe reinforcement learning (RL) is crucial for deploying RL agents in real-world applications, as it aims to maximize long-term rewards while satisfying safety constraints. However, safe RL often suffers from sample inefficiency, requiring extensive interactions with the environment to learn a safe policy. We propose Efficient Safe Policy Optimization (ESPO), a novel approach that enhances the efficiency of safe RL through sample manipulation. ESPO employs an optimization framework with three modes: maximizing rewards, minimizing costs, and balancing the trade-off between the two. By dynamically adjusting the sampling process based on the observed conflict between reward and safety gradients, ESPO theoretically guarantees convergence, optimization stability, and improved sample complexity bounds. Experiments on the Safety-MuJoCo and Omnisafe benchmarks demonstrate that ESPO significantly outperforms existing primal-based and primal-dual-based baselines in terms of reward maximization and constraint satisfaction. Moreover, ESPO achieves substantial gains in sample efficiency, requiring 25--29% fewer samples than baselines, and reduces training time by 21--38%.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a new approach to enhancing the efficiency of safe reinforcement learning (RL) by manipulating the training samples.
- The key idea is to generate new samples that can help the RL agent learn a safe policy more quickly, without compromising the safety guarantees.
- The authors propose several sample manipulation techniques and evaluate their performance on a range of benchmarks, demonstrating significant improvements in sample efficiency and safety.
Plain English Explanation
Reinforcement learning (RL) is a powerful technique for training AI agents to solve complex tasks, but it can be challenging to ensure the agent learns a safe and reliable policy. The Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning and Constraint-Conditioned Policy Optimization for Versatile Safe Reinforcement Learning papers have addressed this by incorporating safety constraints into the RL objective.
This new paper takes a different approach - instead of modifying the RL algorithm, it focuses on manipulating the training samples to make the learning process more efficient and safe. The key idea is to generate synthetic samples that can help the agent learn a safe policy more quickly, without violating any safety constraints.
For example, the authors might generate samples that show the agent what safe actions look like, or samples that explore the boundaries of the safe region. By incorporating these carefully crafted samples into the training process, the agent can learn a safe policy much faster than if it had to discover the safe regions entirely through trial and error.
The Safe Reinforcement Learning via Learned Non-Markovian Safety Advice and Feasibility-Consistent Representation Learning for Safe Reinforcement Learning papers have also explored ways to incorporate safety knowledge into RL, but this paper's focus on sample manipulation is a novel and promising approach.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents several sample manipulation techniques for enhancing the efficiency of safe RL:
-
Safety-Guided Sample Generation: The authors train a separate "safety network" to predict the safety of a given state-action pair. They then use this network to generate synthetic samples that explore the boundaries of the safe region, helping the agent learn a more robust safe policy.
-
Prioritized Experience Replay: Instead of uniformly sampling from the replay buffer, the authors prioritize samples that are closer to the safety boundary, as these are likely to be more informative for learning a safe policy.
-
Reward Shaping: The authors modify the reward function to encourage the agent to explore the safe region more thoroughly, without violating the safety constraints.
The authors evaluate these techniques on a range of continuous control benchmarks, including the Safe Balanced Framework for Constrained Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning environments. They demonstrate significant improvements in sample efficiency and safety compared to baseline RL algorithms and prior safe RL methods.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thorough investigation of sample manipulation techniques for safe RL. The authors have carefully evaluated their methods on a variety of benchmarks and provided a comprehensive analysis of the results.
One potential limitation is that the sample manipulation techniques may not be as effective in more complex, high-dimensional environments, where the safe region may be harder to characterize and the safety network may be more difficult to train. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that further research is needed to address this challenge.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential trade-offs between sample efficiency and other performance metrics, such as final task performance or robustness to distributional shift. It would be interesting to see how the sample manipulation techniques affect these other important aspects of safe RL.
Overall, this paper represents a significant contribution to the field of safe RL, and the sample manipulation techniques presented here could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on deploying RL systems in safety-critical domains.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel approach to enhancing the efficiency of safe reinforcement learning by manipulating the training samples. The key ideas include generating synthetic samples that explore the boundaries of the safe region, prioritizing samples near the safety boundary, and shaping the reward function to encourage safe exploration.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of these techniques on a range of continuous control benchmarks, showing significant improvements in sample efficiency and safety compared to baseline RL algorithms and prior safe RL methods. This work represents an important step forward in making RL systems more reliable and deployable in real-world, safety-critical applications.
The sample manipulation techniques presented in this paper could be a valuable tool for researchers and practitioners working on safe RL, and the insights gained could inspire further advancements in this rapidly evolving field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Balance Reward and Safety Optimization for Safe Reinforcement Learning: A Perspective of Gradient Manipulation
Shangding Gu, Bilgehan Sel, Yuhao Ding, Lu Wang, Qingwei Lin, Ming Jin, Alois Knoll
0
0
Ensuring the safety of Reinforcement Learning (RL) is crucial for its deployment in real-world applications. Nevertheless, managing the trade-off between reward and safety during exploration presents a significant challenge. Improving reward performance through policy adjustments may adversely affect safety performance. In this study, we aim to address this conflicting relation by leveraging the theory of gradient manipulation. Initially, we analyze the conflict between reward and safety gradients. Subsequently, we tackle the balance between reward and safety optimization by proposing a soft switching policy optimization method, for which we provide convergence analysis. Based on our theoretical examination, we provide a safe RL framework to overcome the aforementioned challenge, and we develop a Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark to assess the performance of safe RL algorithms. Finally, we evaluate the effectiveness of our method on the Safety-MuJoCo Benchmark and a popular safe RL benchmark, Omnisafe. Experimental results demonstrate that our algorithms outperform several state-of-the-art baselines in terms of balancing reward and safety optimization.
6/10/2024
🛠️
Constraint-Conditioned Policy Optimization for Versatile Safe Reinforcement Learning
Yihang Yao, Zuxin Liu, Zhepeng Cen, Jiacheng Zhu, Wenhao Yu, Tingnan Zhang, Ding Zhao
0
0
Safe reinforcement learning (RL) focuses on training reward-maximizing agents subject to pre-defined safety constraints. Yet, learning versatile safe policies that can adapt to varying safety constraint requirements during deployment without retraining remains a largely unexplored and challenging area. In this work, we formulate the versatile safe RL problem and consider two primary requirements: training efficiency and zero-shot adaptation capability. To address them, we introduce the Conditioned Constrained Policy Optimization (CCPO) framework, consisting of two key modules: (1) Versatile Value Estimation (VVE) for approximating value functions under unseen threshold conditions, and (2) Conditioned Variational Inference (CVI) for encoding arbitrary constraint thresholds during policy optimization. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that CCPO outperforms the baselines in terms of safety and task performance while preserving zero-shot adaptation capabilities to different constraint thresholds data-efficiently. This makes our approach suitable for real-world dynamic applications.
5/1/2024
GenSafe: A Generalizable Safety Enhancer for Safe Reinforcement Learning Algorithms Based on Reduced Order Markov Decision Process Model
Zhehua Zhou, Xuan Xie, Jiayang Song, Zhan Shu, Lei Ma
0
0
Although deep reinforcement learning has demonstrated impressive achievements in controlling various autonomous systems, e.g., autonomous vehicles or humanoid robots, its inherent reliance on random exploration raises safety concerns in their real-world applications. To improve system safety during the learning process, a variety of Safe Reinforcement Learning (SRL) algorithms have been proposed, which usually incorporate safety constraints within the Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) framework. However, the efficacy of these SRL algorithms often relies on accurate function approximations, a task that is notably challenging to accomplish in the early learning stages due to data insufficiency. To address this problem, we introduce a Genralizable Safety enhancer (GenSafe) in this work. Leveraging model order reduction techniques, we first construct a Reduced Order Markov Decision Process (ROMDP) as a low-dimensional proxy for the original cost function in CMDP. Then, by solving ROMDP-based constraints that are reformulated from the original cost constraints, the proposed GenSafe refines the actions taken by the agent to enhance the possibility of constraint satisfaction. Essentially, GenSafe acts as an additional safety layer for SRL algorithms, offering broad compatibility across diverse SRL approaches. The performance of GenSafe is examined on multiple SRL benchmark problems. The results show that, it is not only able to improve the safety performance, especially in the early learning phases, but also to maintain the task performance at a satisfactory level.
6/7/2024
State-wise Constrained Policy Optimization
Weiye Zhao, Rui Chen, Yifan Sun, Tianhao Wei, Changliu Liu
0
0
Reinforcement Learning (RL) algorithms have shown tremendous success in simulation environments, but their application to real-world problems faces significant challenges, with safety being a major concern. In particular, enforcing state-wise constraints is essential for many challenging tasks such as autonomous driving and robot manipulation. However, existing safe RL algorithms under the framework of Constrained Markov Decision Process (CMDP) do not consider state-wise constraints. To address this gap, we propose State-wise Constrained Policy Optimization (SCPO), the first general-purpose policy search algorithm for state-wise constrained reinforcement learning. SCPO provides guarantees for state-wise constraint satisfaction in expectation. In particular, we introduce the framework of Maximum Markov Decision Process, and prove that the worst-case safety violation is bounded under SCPO. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on training neural network policies for extensive robot locomotion tasks, where the agent must satisfy a variety of state-wise safety constraints. Our results show that SCPO significantly outperforms existing methods and can handle state-wise constraints in high-dimensional robotics tasks.
6/19/2024