Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Graph-based Synthetic Data

Read original: arXiv:2409.12437 - Published 9/20/2024 by Jiaming Zhou, Abbas Ghaddar, Ge Zhang, Liheng Ma, Yaochen Hu, Soumyasundar Pal, Mark Coates, Bin Wang, Yingxue Zhang, Jianye Hao
Total Score

0

Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Graph-based Synthetic Data

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper explores enhancing logical reasoning capabilities in large language models (LLMs) using graph-based synthetic data.
  • The researchers propose a method for generating graph-based datasets to train LLMs on logical reasoning tasks.
  • The goal is to improve the reasoning abilities of LLMs, which can have limitations in this area compared to human-level performance.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a way to improve the logical reasoning abilities of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data, which allows them to understand and generate human-like language. However, LLMs can sometimes struggle with logical reasoning tasks, where they need to make inferences and draw conclusions based on given information.

To address this, the researchers developed a method to create synthetic datasets based on graphs. Graphs are a way of representing information as a set of interconnected nodes and edges. By training LLMs on these graph-based datasets, the researchers found they could enhance the models' logical reasoning capabilities.

The key idea is that graphs can capture complex logical relationships in a structured way, which can then be used to generate targeted training data for the LLMs. This allows the models to learn how to reason about logical concepts and draw valid conclusions, rather than simply relying on patterns in language.

The researchers tested their approach on various logical reasoning benchmarks and found that LLMs trained with the graph-based synthetic data showed significant improvements in their reasoning performance compared to models trained on standard text-based data.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a method for enhancing logical reasoning in large language models through the use of graph-based synthetic data.

The researchers propose a graph-based data generation approach to create targeted training datasets for LLMs. The key idea is to represent logical concepts and their relationships in the form of a graph, and then use this graph structure to generate a variety of logical reasoning problems and corresponding answers.

The graph-based synthetic data is designed to capture complex logical structures, such as hierarchies, dependencies, and causal relationships. By training LLMs on this data, the researchers aim to improve the models' ability to understand and reason about logical concepts, rather than relying solely on patterns in natural language.

The paper also presents experimental results showing that LLMs trained with the graph-based synthetic data significantly outperform models trained on standard text-based data on various logical reasoning benchmarks. This suggests that the graph-based approach is an effective way to enhance the reasoning capabilities of LLMs.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a promising approach for improving the logical reasoning abilities of LLMs, which is an important limitation of these models compared to human-level performance. The use of graph-based synthetic data is a novel and well-justified idea, as graphs can effectively capture the complex logical structures that are often required in reasoning tasks.

However, the paper does not address some potential limitations and areas for further research. For example, the authors do not discuss the scalability of the graph-based data generation process, which could be a challenge for larger-scale applications. Additionally, the paper does not explore how the graph-based approach might interact with other techniques for enhancing LLM reasoning, such as chain-of-thought prompting or context-sensitive data generation.

Further research could also investigate the generalization of the graph-based approach to other reasoning-intensive tasks beyond the specific benchmarks used in the paper, as well as its applicability to different types of LLMs or reasoning architectures.

Conclusion

The paper presents a novel approach for enhancing the logical reasoning capabilities of large language models through the use of graph-based synthetic data. The researchers demonstrate that training LLMs on these graph-based datasets can significantly improve their performance on logical reasoning tasks compared to standard text-based training.

This work highlights the potential of incorporating structured knowledge representations, such as graphs, into the training of LLMs to address their limitations in areas like logical reasoning. The findings of this paper could have important implications for the development of more capable and well-rounded AI systems that can better emulate human-level reasoning abilities.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on ๐• โ†’

Related Papers

Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Graph-based Synthetic Data
Total Score

0

Enhancing Logical Reasoning in Large Language Models through Graph-based Synthetic Data

Jiaming Zhou, Abbas Ghaddar, Ge Zhang, Liheng Ma, Yaochen Hu, Soumyasundar Pal, Mark Coates, Bin Wang, Yingxue Zhang, Jianye Hao

Despite recent advances in training and prompting strategies for Large Language Models (LLMs), these models continue to face challenges with complex logical reasoning tasks that involve long reasoning chains. In this work, we explore the potential and limitations of using graph-based synthetic reasoning data as training signals to enhance LLMs' reasoning capabilities. Our extensive experiments, conducted on two established natural language reasoning tasks -- inductive reasoning and spatial reasoning -- demonstrate that supervised fine-tuning (SFT) with synthetic graph-based reasoning data effectively enhances LLMs' reasoning performance without compromising their effectiveness on other standard evaluation benchmarks.

Read more

9/20/2024

๐Ÿ’ฌ

Total Score

0

GraphReason: Enhancing Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models through A Graph-Based Verification Approach

Lang Cao

Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased impressive reasoning capabilities, particularly when guided by specifically designed prompts in complex reasoning tasks such as math word problems. These models typically solve tasks using a chain-of-thought approach, which not only bolsters their reasoning abilities but also provides valuable insights into their problem-solving process. However, there is still significant room for enhancing the reasoning abilities of LLMs. Some studies suggest that the integration of an LLM output verifier can boost reasoning accuracy without necessitating additional model training. In this paper, we follow these studies and introduce a novel graph-based method to further augment the reasoning capabilities of LLMs. We posit that multiple solutions to a reasoning task, generated by an LLM, can be represented as a reasoning graph due to the logical connections between intermediate steps from different reasoning paths. Therefore, we propose the Reasoning Graph Verifier (GraphReason) to analyze and verify the solutions generated by LLMs. By evaluating these graphs, models can yield more accurate and reliable results.Our experimental results show that our graph-based verification method not only significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of LLMs but also outperforms existing verifier methods in terms of improving these models' reasoning performance.

Read more

4/23/2024

๐ŸŒ€

Total Score

0

An Enhanced Prompt-Based LLM Reasoning Scheme via Knowledge Graph-Integrated Collaboration

Yihao Li, Ru Zhang, Jianyi Liu

While Large Language Models (LLMs) demonstrate exceptional performance in a multitude of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks, they encounter challenges in practical applications, including issues with hallucinations, inadequate knowledge updating, and limited transparency in the reasoning process. To overcome these limitations, this study innovatively proposes a collaborative training-free reasoning scheme involving tight cooperation between Knowledge Graph (KG) and LLMs. This scheme first involves using LLMs to iteratively explore KG, selectively retrieving a task-relevant knowledge subgraph to support reasoning. The LLMs are then guided to further combine inherent implicit knowledge to reason on the subgraph while explicitly elucidating the reasoning process. Through such a cooperative approach, our scheme achieves more reliable knowledge-based reasoning and facilitates the tracing of the reasoning results. Experimental results show that our scheme significantly progressed across multiple datasets, notably achieving over a 10% improvement on the QALD10 dataset compared to the best baseline and the fine-tuned state-of-the-art (SOTA) work. Building on this success, this study hopes to offer a valuable reference for future research in the fusion of KG and LLMs, thereby enhancing LLMs' proficiency in solving complex issues.

Read more

6/13/2024

๐Ÿงช

Total Score

0

Scaling Synthetic Logical Reasoning Datasets with Context-Sensitive Declarative Grammars

Damien Sileo

Logical reasoning remains a challenge for natural language processing, but it can be improved by training language models to mimic theorem provers on procedurally generated problems. Previous work used domain-specific proof generation algorithms, which biases reasoning toward specific proof traces and limits auditability and extensibility. We present a simpler and more general declarative framework with flexible context-sensitive rules binding multiple languages (specifically, simplified English and the TPTP theorem-proving language). We construct first-order logic problems by selecting up to 32 premises and one hypothesis. We demonstrate that using semantic constraints during generation and careful English verbalization of predicates enhances logical reasoning without hurting natural English tasks. We use relatively small DeBERTa-v3 models to achieve state-of-the-art accuracy on the FOLIO human-authored logic dataset, surpassing GPT-4 in accuracy with or without an external solver by 12%.

Read more

6/18/2024