Evaluating Large Language Models' Ability Using a Psychiatric Screening Tool Based on Metaphor and Sarcasm Scenarios
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Metaphors and sarcasm are complex linguistic devices that require advanced social communication skills
- Children with Asperger syndrome often struggle to understand metaphors and sarcasm
- This paper evaluates whether large language models can comprehend metaphors and sarcasm using a screening test for Asperger syndrome
Plain English Explanation
Metaphors and sarcasm are creative ways of using language that rely on our ability to understand subtext and social cues. However, individuals with Asperger syndrome can have difficulty grasping these linguistic nuances. This research paper investigates whether large language models - powerful AI systems trained on massive amounts of text data - can understand metaphors and sarcasm as effectively as humans by using a screening test for Asperger syndrome. The goal is to assess how well these AI models can comprehend the complex social and emotional aspects of language.
Technical Explanation
The researchers used a widely-accepted screening test for Asperger syndrome, called the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), to evaluate the performance of several large language models on tasks involving metaphors and sarcasm. The AQ test includes questions that assess an individual's ability to interpret figurative language and detect social cues.
By applying the AQ test to the language models, the researchers were able to measure how well the models could understand the nuanced, context-dependent meanings conveyed through metaphors and sarcasm - skills that are typically impaired in individuals with Asperger syndrome. This approach provided a standardized way to benchmark the models' comprehension of these complex linguistic phenomena.
The results of the study indicate that while the language models showed some ability to grasp metaphors and sarcasm, they still lagged behind human-level performance on the AQ test. This suggests that current language models have room for improvement when it comes to understanding the subtleties of human communication, especially in social and emotional contexts.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that the language models evaluated in this study may not represent the full capabilities of modern large language models, as the research was conducted using earlier versions of these systems. Additionally, the AQ test may not capture the entirety of human language understanding, as it is primarily focused on the specific challenges faced by individuals with Asperger syndrome.
Further research is needed to explore additional methods for evaluating language models' comprehension of metaphors, sarcasm, and other complex linguistic phenomena. Expanding the range of tasks and benchmarks used to assess these models could lead to a more comprehensive understanding of their capabilities and limitations in the realm of social and emotional language processing.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach to evaluating large language models' ability to understand metaphors and sarcasm using a screening test for Asperger syndrome. The results suggest that while these models have made significant progress in language understanding, they still have room for improvement when it comes to grasping the nuanced, context-dependent meanings conveyed through figurative and social language. Continued research in this area could help advance the development of AI systems that can more effectively communicate and engage with humans in a wide range of social and emotional contexts.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluating Large Language Models' Ability Using a Psychiatric Screening Tool Based on Metaphor and Sarcasm Scenarios
Hiromu Yakura
Metaphors and sarcasm are precious fruits of our highly evolved social communication skills. However, children with the condition then known as Asperger syndrome are known to have difficulties in comprehending sarcasm, even if they possess adequate verbal IQs for understanding metaphors. Accordingly, researchers had employed a screening test that assesses metaphor and sarcasm comprehension to distinguish Asperger syndrome from other conditions with similar external behaviors (e.g., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder). This study employs a standardized test to evaluate recent large language models' (LLMs) understanding of nuanced human communication. The results indicate improved metaphor comprehension with increased model parameters; however, no similar improvement was observed for sarcasm comprehension. Considering that a human's ability to grasp sarcasm has been associated with the amygdala, a pivotal cerebral region for emotional learning, a distinctive strategy for training LLMs would be imperative to imbue them with the ability in a cognitively grounded manner.
Read more7/23/2024
0
Towards Evaluating Large Language Models on Sarcasm Understanding
Yazhou Zhang, Chunwang Zou, Zheng Lian, Prayag Tiwari, Jing Qin
In the era of large language models (LLMs), the task of ``System I''~-~the fast, unconscious, and intuitive tasks, e.g., sentiment analysis, text classification, etc., have been argued to be successfully solved. However, sarcasm, as a subtle linguistic phenomenon, often employs rhetorical devices like hyperbole and figuration to convey true sentiments and intentions, involving a higher level of abstraction than sentiment analysis. There is growing concern that the argument about LLMs' success may not be fully tenable when considering sarcasm understanding. To address this question, we select eleven SOTA LLMs and eight SOTA pre-trained language models (PLMs) and present comprehensive evaluations on six widely used benchmark datasets through different prompting approaches, i.e., zero-shot input/output (IO) prompting, few-shot IO prompting, chain of thought (CoT) prompting. Our results highlight three key findings: (1) current LLMs underperform supervised PLMs based sarcasm detection baselines across six sarcasm benchmarks. This suggests that significant efforts are still required to improve LLMs' understanding of human sarcasm. (2) GPT-4 consistently and significantly outperforms other LLMs across various prompting methods, with an average improvement of 14.0%$uparrow$. Claude 3 and ChatGPT demonstrate the next best performance after GPT-4. (3) Few-shot IO prompting method outperforms the other two methods: zero-shot IO and few-shot CoT. The reason is that sarcasm detection, being a holistic, intuitive, and non-rational cognitive process, is argued not to adhere to step-by-step logical reasoning, making CoT less effective in understanding sarcasm compared to its effectiveness in mathematical reasoning tasks.
Read more8/27/2024
0
NYK-MS: A Well-annotated Multi-modal Metaphor and Sarcasm Understanding Benchmark on Cartoon-Caption Dataset
Ke Chang, Hao Li, Junzhao Zhang, Yunfang Wu
Metaphor and sarcasm are common figurative expressions in people's communication, especially on the Internet or the memes popular among teenagers. We create a new benchmark named NYK-MS (NewYorKer for Metaphor and Sarcasm), which contains 1,583 samples for metaphor understanding tasks and 1,578 samples for sarcasm understanding tasks. These tasks include whether it contains metaphor/sarcasm, which word or object contains metaphor/sarcasm, what does it satirize and why does it contains metaphor/sarcasm, all of the 7 tasks are well-annotated by at least 3 annotators. We annotate the dataset for several rounds to improve the consistency and quality, and use GUI and GPT-4V to raise our efficiency. Based on the benchmark, we conduct plenty of experiments. In the zero-shot experiments, we show that Large Language Models (LLM) and Large Multi-modal Models (LMM) can't do classification task well, and as the scale increases, the performance on other 5 tasks improves. In the experiments on traditional pre-train models, we show the enhancement with augment and alignment methods, which prove our benchmark is consistent with previous dataset and requires the model to understand both of the two modalities.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Is Sarcasm Detection A Step-by-Step Reasoning Process in Large Language Models?
Ben Yao, Yazhou Zhang, Qiuchi Li, Jing Qin
Elaborating a series of intermediate reasoning steps significantly improves the ability of large language models (LLMs) to solve complex problems, as such steps would evoke LLMs to think sequentially. However, human sarcasm understanding is often considered an intuitive and holistic cognitive process, in which various linguistic, contextual, and emotional cues are integrated to form a comprehensive understanding, in a way that does not necessarily follow a step-by-step fashion. To verify the validity of this argument, we introduce a new prompting framework (called SarcasmCue) containing four sub-methods, viz. chain of contradiction (CoC), graph of cues (GoC), bagging of cues (BoC) and tensor of cues (ToC), which elicits LLMs to detect human sarcasm by considering sequential and non-sequential prompting methods. Through a comprehensive empirical comparison on four benchmarks, we highlight three key findings: (1) CoC and GoC show superior performance with more advanced models like GPT-4 and Claude 3.5, with an improvement of 3.5%. (2) ToC significantly outperforms other methods when smaller LLMs are evaluated, boosting the F1 score by 29.7% over the best baseline. (3) Our proposed framework consistently pushes the state-of-the-art (i.e., ToT) by 4.2%, 2.0%, 29.7%, and 58.2% in F1 scores across four datasets. This demonstrates the effectiveness and stability of the proposed framework.
Read more8/27/2024