Evaluating Uncertainty-based Failure Detection for Closed-Loop LLM Planners
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper evaluates the use of uncertainty-based failure detection for closed-loop large language model (LLM) planners, which are AI systems that plan and execute tasks in the real world.
- The researchers explore how well LLM planners can detect when their plans are likely to fail, using the uncertainty estimates provided by the language model.
- They conduct experiments on various simulated tasks to assess the performance of this uncertainty-based failure detection approach.
Plain English Explanation
The paper looks at a way to help AI systems that plan and carry out tasks in the real world become more reliable. These AI systems, called "closed-loop LLM planners," use large language models to understand the world, make plans, and take actions. The researchers wanted to see if these systems could use the uncertainty estimates from the language model to figure out when their plans are likely to fail.
Harnessing the Power of Large Language Model Uncertainty for Aware and Benchmarking LLMs via Uncertainty Quantification have explored using uncertainty estimates from language models in various ways. This paper builds on that work by applying it specifically to task planning systems.
The researchers ran experiments in simulated environments to test how well the uncertainty-based failure detection worked. They looked at things like how often the system could correctly identify when a plan was going to fail, and how that affected the overall performance of the planning system.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an approach for using uncertainty estimates from a large language model to detect when a closed-loop planner is likely to fail at executing a plan. The researchers conducted experiments in simulated environments to evaluate the performance of this uncertainty-based failure detection.
The closed-loop planner consists of a language model that is used to understand the world state, reason about possible actions, and generate plans. The language model also provides uncertainty estimates for its predictions, which the researchers use as the basis for failure detection.
Uncertainty Estimation and Quantification for LLMs: A Simple Supervised Approach and Learning from Mistakes: A Weakly Supervised Method for Mitigating have explored methods for estimating and using uncertainty from language models.
In the experiments, the researchers tested the planner's ability to detect and recover from potential failures across a range of simulated tasks. They compared the performance of the uncertainty-based failure detection approach to a baseline planner without any failure detection.
The results show that the uncertainty-based failure detection can significantly improve the overall task completion rate and efficiency of the closed-loop planner, by allowing it to avoid executing plans that are likely to fail.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough evaluation of the uncertainty-based failure detection approach, but there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research:
- The experiments were conducted in simulated environments, so it's unclear how well the approach would generalize to real-world tasks and environments, which may be more complex and unpredictable.
- The paper does not explore how the uncertainty-based failure detection would perform in the presence of adversarial inputs or other forms of distribution shift, which could be a concern for real-world deployment.
- While the experiments demonstrate the benefits of the uncertainty-based approach, the paper does not provide a deep analysis of the types of failures that the system is able to detect and recover from.
Self-Corrected Multimodal Large Language Model for End explores some related ideas around using language models for error detection and self-correction, which could be a useful avenue for further research in this area.
Conclusion
This paper presents a promising approach for using uncertainty estimates from large language models to improve the reliability of closed-loop planning systems. The experiments demonstrate that uncertainty-based failure detection can significantly enhance the task completion rate and efficiency of these AI systems.
While there are some limitations to the current work, the findings suggest that further research in this direction could lead to more robust and trustworthy AI planners that can be safely deployed in real-world applications. As language models continue to advance, integrating uncertainty-aware capabilities like this could be an important step towards building more reliable and capable AI systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Evaluating Uncertainty-based Failure Detection for Closed-Loop LLM Planners
Zhi Zheng, Qian Feng, Hang Li, Alois Knoll, Jianxiang Feng
Recently, Large Language Models (LLMs) have witnessed remarkable performance as zero-shot task planners for robotic manipulation tasks. However, the open-loop nature of previous works makes LLM-based planning error-prone and fragile. On the other hand, failure detection approaches for closed-loop planning are often limited by task-specific heuristics or following an unrealistic assumption that the prediction is trustworthy all the time. As a general-purpose reasoning machine, LLMs or Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are promising for detecting failures. However, However, the appropriateness of the aforementioned assumption diminishes due to the notorious hullucination problem. In this work, we attempt to mitigate these issues by introducing a framework for closed-loop LLM-based planning called KnowLoop, backed by an uncertainty-based MLLMs failure detector, which is agnostic to any used MLLMs or LLMs. Specifically, we evaluate three different ways for quantifying the uncertainty of MLLMs, namely token probability, entropy, and self-explained confidence as primary metrics based on three carefully designed representative prompting strategies. With a self-collected dataset including various manipulation tasks and an LLM-based robot system, our experiments demonstrate that token probability and entropy are more reflective compared to self-explained confidence. By setting an appropriate threshold to filter out uncertain predictions and seek human help actively, the accuracy of failure detection can be significantly enhanced. This improvement boosts the effectiveness of closed-loop planning and the overall success rate of tasks.
Read more6/4/2024
0
Cycles of Thought: Measuring LLM Confidence through Stable Explanations
Evan Becker, Stefano Soatto
In many high-risk machine learning applications it is essential for a model to indicate when it is uncertain about a prediction. While large language models (LLMs) can reach and even surpass human-level accuracy on a variety of benchmarks, their overconfidence in incorrect responses is still a well-documented failure mode. Traditional methods for ML uncertainty quantification can be difficult to directly adapt to LLMs due to the computational cost of implementation and closed-source nature of many models. A variety of black-box methods have recently been proposed, but these often rely on heuristics such as self-verbalized confidence. We instead propose a framework for measuring an LLM's uncertainty with respect to the distribution of generated explanations for an answer. While utilizing explanations is not a new idea in and of itself, by interpreting each possible model+explanation pair as a test-time classifier we can calculate a posterior answer distribution over the most likely of these classifiers. We demonstrate how a specific instance of this framework using explanation entailment as our classifier likelihood improves confidence score metrics (in particular AURC and AUROC) over baselines across five different datasets. We believe these results indicate that our framework is both a well-principled and effective way of quantifying uncertainty in LLMs.
Read more6/6/2024
📶
0
Grounding LLMs For Robot Task Planning Using Closed-loop State Feedback
Vineet Bhat, Ali Umut Kaypak, Prashanth Krishnamurthy, Ramesh Karri, Farshad Khorrami
Planning algorithms decompose complex problems into intermediate steps that can be sequentially executed by robots to complete tasks. Recent works have employed Large Language Models (LLMs) for task planning, using natural language to generate robot policies in both simulation and real-world environments. LLMs like GPT-4 have shown promising results in generalizing to unseen tasks, but their applicability is limited due to hallucinations caused by insufficient grounding in the robot environment. The robustness of LLMs in task planning can be enhanced with environmental state information and feedback. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach to task planning that utilizes two separate LLMs for high-level planning and low-level control, improving task-related success rates and goal condition recall. Our algorithm, textit{BrainBody-LLM}, draws inspiration from the human neural system, emulating its brain-body architecture by dividing planning across two LLMs in a structured, hierarchical manner. BrainBody-LLM implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism, enabling learning from simulator errors to resolve execution errors in complex settings. We demonstrate the successful application of BrainBody-LLM in the VirtualHome simulation environment, achieving a 29% improvement in task-oriented success rates over competitive baselines with the GPT-4 backend. Additionally, we evaluate our algorithm on seven complex tasks using a realistic physics simulator and the Franka Research 3 robotic arm, comparing it with various state-of-the-art LLMs. Our results show advancements in the reasoning capabilities of recent LLMs, which enable them to learn from raw simulator/controller errors to correct plans, making them highly effective in robotic task planning.
Read more8/19/2024
0
Introspective Planning: Aligning Robots' Uncertainty with Inherent Task Ambiguity
Kaiqu Liang, Zixu Zhang, Jaime Fern'andez Fisac
Large language models (LLMs) exhibit advanced reasoning skills, enabling robots to comprehend natural language instructions and strategically plan high-level actions through proper grounding. However, LLM hallucination may result in robots confidently executing plans that are misaligned with user goals or, in extreme cases, unsafe. Additionally, inherent ambiguity in natural language instructions can induce task uncertainty, particularly in situations where multiple valid options exist. To address this issue, LLMs must identify such uncertainty and proactively seek clarification. This paper explores the concept of introspective planning as a systematic method for guiding LLMs in forming uncertainty--aware plans for robotic task execution without the need for fine-tuning. We investigate uncertainty quantification in task-level robot planning and demonstrate that introspection significantly improves both success rates and safety compared to state-of-the-art LLM-based planning approaches. Furthermore, we assess the effectiveness of introspective planning in conjunction with conformal prediction, revealing that this combination yields tighter confidence bounds, thereby maintaining statistical success guarantees with fewer superfluous user clarification queries. Code is available at https://github.com/kevinliang888/IntroPlan.
Read more6/5/2024