Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI
0
🏷️
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This study comprehensively evaluates the performance of OpenAI's large language model, o1-preview, across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks.
- The model demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance in areas ranging from coding challenges to scientific reasoning and from language processing to creative problem-solving.
- Key findings include high success rates in solving complex programming problems, generating accurate radiology reports, solving high school-level math problems, and excelling in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers tested a powerful artificial intelligence (AI) model, called o1-preview, created by OpenAI, to see how well it could handle a wide range of challenging tasks. They wanted to understand the model's capabilities and how it compared to human performance.
The results were quite impressive. The o1-preview model was able to solve complex programming problems, generate detailed and accurate medical reports, solve high school-level math problems, and demonstrate advanced language understanding and reasoning skills across diverse fields like science, engineering, and finance.
In many cases, the model's performance was on par with or even better than that of human experts. For example, it had an 83.3% success rate in solving difficult competitive programming problems, surpassing many human programmers. It also outperformed other AI models in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports.
The model's strength seemed to lie in its ability to integrate knowledge and apply complex reasoning to solve intricate problems. While it did have some limitations, such as occasional errors on simpler tasks or challenges with highly specialized concepts, the overall results suggest significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence, which is the goal of creating AI systems that can match or exceed human-level performance across a wide range of cognitive abilities.
Technical Explanation
The researchers conducted a comprehensive evaluation of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model, assessing its performance across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks. These tasks spanned multiple domains, including computer science, mathematics, natural sciences, medicine, linguistics, and social sciences.
Through rigorous testing, the researchers found that the o1-preview model demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance. For example, the model achieved an 83.3% success rate in solving complex competitive programming problems, surpassing many human experts. It also showed superior ability in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports, outperforming other evaluated models.
In the domain of mathematics, the o1-preview model demonstrated 100% accuracy in high school-level reasoning tasks, providing detailed step-by-step solutions. The researchers also found the model to have advanced natural language inference capabilities across general and specialized domains, such as medicine.
The model's performance was particularly impressive in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields. It excelled in chip design tasks, outperforming specialized models in areas like EDA script generation and bug analysis. The model also demonstrated remarkable proficiency in anthropology, geology, and quantitative investing, showcasing its comprehensive knowledge and statistical modeling skills.
Additionally, the o1-preview model exhibited effective performance in social media analysis, including sentiment analysis and emotion recognition.
While the researchers did observe some limitations, such as occasional errors on simpler problems and challenges with certain highly specialized concepts, the overall results indicate significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge that the o1-preview model does have some limitations. For instance, it occasionally made errors on simpler problems and faced challenges with certain highly specialized concepts. Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the model's weaknesses or potential biases.
Further research is needed to better understand the model's limitations and potential issues, particularly in areas where it may struggle or produce biased or inaccurate results. The researchers should also consider evaluating the model's performance on a wider range of tasks and in more diverse real-world scenarios to fully assess its capabilities and limitations.
Despite these caveats, the study's findings are undoubtedly impressive and suggest significant progress towards the development of artificial general intelligence. The model's ability to excel in such a wide range of complex reasoning tasks, often surpassing human-level performance, is a remarkable achievement and a promising step forward in the field of AI.
Conclusion
This comprehensive study provides a detailed evaluation of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model, demonstrating its impressive capabilities across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks. The model's remarkable performance, often exceeding human-level abilities, suggests significant advancements towards the goal of artificial general intelligence.
While the researchers acknowledge some limitations, the overall findings highlight the model's potential to revolutionize various industries and domains, from computer science and medicine to finance and social sciences. As the field of AI continues to evolve, studies like this one serve as important milestones, pushing the boundaries of what is possible and inspiring further research and development in the pursuit of truly intelligent systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🏷️
0
Evaluation of OpenAI o1: Opportunities and Challenges of AGI
Tianyang Zhong, Zhengliang Liu, Yi Pan, Yutong Zhang, Yifan Zhou, Shizhe Liang, Zihao Wu, Yanjun Lyu, Peng Shu, Xiaowei Yu, Chao Cao, Hanqi Jiang, Hanxu Chen, Yiwei Li, Junhao Chen, Huawen Hu, Yihen Liu, Huaqin Zhao, Shaochen Xu, Haixing Dai, Lin Zhao, Ruidong Zhang, Wei Zhao, Zhenyuan Yang, Jingyuan Chen, Peilong Wang, Wei Ruan, Hui Wang, Huan Zhao, Jing Zhang, Yiming Ren, Shihuan Qin, Tong Chen, Jiaxi Li, Arif Hassan Zidan, Afrar Jahin, Minheng Chen, Sichen Xia, Jason Holmes, Yan Zhuang, Jiaqi Wang, Bochen Xu, Weiran Xia, Jichao Yu, Kaibo Tang, Yaxuan Yang, Bolun Sun, Tao Yang, Guoyu Lu, Xianqiao Wang, Lilong Chai, He Li, Jin Lu, Lichao Sun, Xin Zhang, Bao Ge, Xintao Hu, Lian Zhang, Hua Zhou, Lu Zhang, Shu Zhang, Ninghao Liu, Bei Jiang, Linglong Kong, Zhen Xiang, Yudan Ren, Jun Liu, Xi Jiang, Yu Bao, Wei Zhang, Xiang Li, Gang Li, Wei Liu, Dinggang Shen, Andrea Sikora, Xiaoming Zhai, Dajiang Zhu, Tianming Liu
This comprehensive study evaluates the performance of OpenAI's o1-preview large language model across a diverse array of complex reasoning tasks, spanning multiple domains, including computer science, mathematics, natural sciences, medicine, linguistics, and social sciences. Through rigorous testing, o1-preview demonstrated remarkable capabilities, often achieving human-level or superior performance in areas ranging from coding challenges to scientific reasoning and from language processing to creative problem-solving. Key findings include: -83.3% success rate in solving complex competitive programming problems, surpassing many human experts. -Superior ability in generating coherent and accurate radiology reports, outperforming other evaluated models. -100% accuracy in high school-level mathematical reasoning tasks, providing detailed step-by-step solutions. -Advanced natural language inference capabilities across general and specialized domains like medicine. -Impressive performance in chip design tasks, outperforming specialized models in areas such as EDA script generation and bug analysis. -Remarkable proficiency in anthropology and geology, demonstrating deep understanding and reasoning in these specialized fields. -Strong capabilities in quantitative investing. O1 has comprehensive financial knowledge and statistical modeling skills. -Effective performance in social media analysis, including sentiment analysis and emotion recognition. The model excelled particularly in tasks requiring intricate reasoning and knowledge integration across various fields. While some limitations were observed, including occasional errors on simpler problems and challenges with certain highly specialized concepts, the overall results indicate significant progress towards artificial general intelligence.
Read more9/30/2024
1
A Preliminary Study of o1 in Medicine: Are We Closer to an AI Doctor?
Yunfei Xie, Juncheng Wu, Haoqin Tu, Siwei Yang, Bingchen Zhao, Yongshuo Zong, Qiao Jin, Cihang Xie, Yuyin Zhou
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities across various domains and tasks, pushing the boundaries of our knowledge in learning and cognition. The latest model, OpenAI's o1, stands out as the first LLM with an internalized chain-of-thought technique using reinforcement learning strategies. While it has demonstrated surprisingly strong capabilities on various general language tasks, its performance in specialized fields such as medicine remains unknown. To this end, this report provides a comprehensive exploration of o1 on different medical scenarios, examining 3 key aspects: understanding, reasoning, and multilinguality. Specifically, our evaluation encompasses 6 tasks using data from 37 medical datasets, including two newly constructed and more challenging question-answering (QA) tasks based on professional medical quizzes from the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) and The Lancet. These datasets offer greater clinical relevance compared to standard medical QA benchmarks such as MedQA, translating more effectively into real-world clinical utility. Our analysis of o1 suggests that the enhanced reasoning ability of LLMs may (significantly) benefit their capability to understand various medical instructions and reason through complex clinical scenarios. Notably, o1 surpasses the previous GPT-4 in accuracy by an average of 6.2% and 6.6% across 19 datasets and two newly created complex QA scenarios. But meanwhile, we identify several weaknesses in both the model capability and the existing evaluation protocols, including hallucination, inconsistent multilingual ability, and discrepant metrics for evaluation. We release our raw data and model outputs at https://ucsc-vlaa.github.io/o1_medicine/ for future research.
Read more9/24/2024
0
New!On The Planning Abilities of OpenAI's o1 Models: Feasibility, Optimality, and Generalizability
Kevin Wang, Junbo Li, Neel P. Bhatt, Yihan Xi, Qiang Liu, Ufuk Topcu, Zhangyang Wang
Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased their ability to perform complex reasoning tasks, but their effectiveness in planning remains underexplored. In this study, we evaluate the planning capabilities of OpenAI's o1 models across a variety of benchmark tasks, focusing on three key aspects: feasibility, optimality, and generalizability. Through empirical evaluations on constraint-heavy tasks (e.g., $textit{Barman}$, $textit{Tyreworld}$) and spatially complex environments (e.g., $textit{Termes}$, $textit{Floortile}$), we highlight o1-preview's strengths in self-evaluation and constraint-following, while also identifying bottlenecks in decision-making and memory management, particularly in tasks requiring robust spatial reasoning. Our results reveal that o1-preview outperforms GPT-4 in adhering to task constraints and managing state transitions in structured environments. However, the model often generates suboptimal solutions with redundant actions and struggles to generalize effectively in spatially complex tasks. This pilot study provides foundational insights into the planning limitations of LLMs, offering key directions for future research on improving memory management, decision-making, and generalization in LLM-based planning.
Read more10/2/2024
0
OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI
Zhen Huang, Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Ruijie Xu, Run-Ze Fan, Lyumanshan Ye, Ethan Chern, Yixin Ye, Yikai Zhang, Yuqing Yang, Ting Wu, Binjie Wang, Shichao Sun, Yang Xiao, Yiyuan Li, Fan Zhou, Steffi Chern, Yiwei Qin, Yan Ma, Jiadi Su, Yixiu Liu, Yuxiang Zheng, Shaoting Zhang, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao, Pengfei Liu
The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been significantly accelerated by advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), gradually showcasing potential cognitive reasoning abilities in problem-solving and scientific discovery (i.e., AI4Science) once exclusive to human intellect. To comprehensively evaluate current models' performance in cognitive reasoning abilities, we introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities. These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage. We argue that the challenges in Olympic competition problems are ideal for evaluating AI's cognitive reasoning due to their complexity and interdisciplinary nature, which are essential for tackling complex scientific challenges and facilitating discoveries. Beyond evaluating performance across various disciplines using answer-only criteria, we conduct detailed experiments and analyses from multiple perspectives. We delve into the models' cognitive reasoning abilities, their performance across different modalities, and their outcomes in process-level evaluations, which are vital for tasks requiring complex reasoning with lengthy solutions. Our extensive evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration. Through the OlympicArena, we aim to advance AI towards superintelligence, equipping it to address more complex challenges in science and beyond. We also provide a comprehensive set of resources to support AI research, including a benchmark dataset, an open-source annotation platform, a detailed evaluation tool, and a leaderboard with automatic submission features.
Read more6/19/2024