OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI

Read original: arXiv:2406.12753 - Published 6/19/2024 by Zhen Huang, Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Ruijie Xu, Run-Ze Fan, Lyumanshan Ye, Ethan Chern, Yixin Ye and 18 others

Overview

This paper introduces the OlympicArena, a new benchmark for evaluating the multi-discipline cognitive reasoning capabilities of superintelligent AI systems.
The benchmark aims to challenge AI models across a diverse range of tasks, including language, reasoning, problem-solving, and physical/spatial cognition.
The researchers hope the OlympicArena will serve as a rigorous and comprehensive test bed for assessing the progress of AI systems towards artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Plain English Explanation

The OlympicArena is a new benchmark designed to test the advanced cognitive abilities of superintelligent AI systems. Rather than focusing on a single skill like language or image recognition, this benchmark challenges AI models across a wide variety of disciplines, from language and logic to physical reasoning and problem-solving.

The goal is to create a more comprehensive assessment of an AI system's general intelligence, mimicking the diversity of tasks that humans must excel at to be considered truly intelligent. By putting these powerful AI systems through their paces in the OlympicArena, researchers aim to gauge how close we are to achieving artificial general intelligence (AGI) - AI with human-level abilities across the board.

Just as human Olympians must demonstrate mastery in multiple events to win the coveted gold medal, the OlympicArena will separate the capable AI contenders from the truly exceptional ones. This benchmark could become an important milestone in the quest to develop AI systems that can match or even surpass human intelligence in its breadth and flexibility.

Technical Explanation

The OlympicArena benchmark is designed to assess the multi-discipline cognitive reasoning capabilities of advanced AI models. It consists of a diverse set of tasks spanning language, reasoning, problem-solving, and physical/spatial cognition, inspired by the various events at the Olympic Games.

Some example tasks include:

GameBench: Evaluating strategic reasoning abilities through game-playing challenges
M3GIC: Assessing multilingual and multimodal general intelligence
CEBIR: Benchmarking image reasoning and description abilities
Competitive-Level Problems: Evaluating large language model performance on challenging, competition-level problems

By combining these diverse cognitive tasks into a single benchmark, the researchers aim to create a more comprehensive assessment of an AI system's general intelligence compared to traditional single-task evaluations. The OlympicArena is intended to serve as a rigorous test bed for accelerating progress towards artificial general intelligence (AGI).

Critical Analysis

The OlympicArena benchmark represents an ambitious and well-designed effort to push the boundaries of AI evaluation. By incorporating a wide range of cognitive tasks, the researchers are attempting to move beyond narrow, specialized capabilities and toward a more holistic measure of general intelligence.

However, the paper acknowledges several limitations and challenges that must be addressed. For example, the benchmark may still favor certain types of reasoning or modalities over others, and it remains to be seen whether the individual tasks are truly representative of real-world human intelligence. Additionally, the scoring and aggregation methods used to assess overall performance will be crucial in ensuring the benchmark provides meaningful and actionable insights.

Furthermore, the researchers note that the OlympicArena is intended to be a continuous, evolving benchmark, with new tasks and challenges added over time to keep pace with advancements in AI. Maintaining the integrity and relevance of the benchmark as the field progresses will be an ongoing challenge.

Despite these considerations, the OlympicArena represents a significant step forward in the quest to develop more comprehensive and rigorous evaluations of artificial general intelligence. By pushing the boundaries of what current AI systems are capable of, this benchmark could accelerate progress towards the development of truly intelligent machines that can match or even surpass human-level abilities across a wide range of domains.

Conclusion

The OlympicArena benchmark introduces a novel approach to evaluating the multi-discipline cognitive reasoning capabilities of superintelligent AI systems. By challenging models across a diverse range of tasks, the researchers aim to create a more comprehensive assessment of general intelligence that could serve as a crucial milestone in the pursuit of artificial general intelligence (AGI).

While the benchmark faces some limitations and challenges, it represents an important step forward in the field of AI evaluation. By pushing the boundaries of what current systems can do, the OlympicArena could help drive progress towards the development of AI with human-level abilities across a wide range of domains, ultimately transforming the way we interact with and rely on intelligent machines.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

OlympicArena: Benchmarking Multi-discipline Cognitive Reasoning for Superintelligent AI

Zhen Huang, Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Xuefeng Li, Haoyang Zou, Ruijie Xu, Run-Ze Fan, Lyumanshan Ye, Ethan Chern, Yixin Ye, Yikai Zhang, Yuqing Yang, Ting Wu, Binjie Wang, Shichao Sun, Yang Xiao, Yiyuan Li, Fan Zhou, Steffi Chern, Yiwei Qin, Yan Ma, Jiadi Su, Yixiu Liu, Yuxiang Zheng, Shaoting Zhang, Dahua Lin, Yu Qiao, Pengfei Liu

The evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been significantly accelerated by advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), gradually showcasing potential cognitive reasoning abilities in problem-solving and scientific discovery (i.e., AI4Science) once exclusive to human intellect. To comprehensively evaluate current models' performance in cognitive reasoning abilities, we introduce OlympicArena, which includes 11,163 bilingual problems across both text-only and interleaved text-image modalities. These challenges encompass a wide range of disciplines spanning seven fields and 62 international Olympic competitions, rigorously examined for data leakage. We argue that the challenges in Olympic competition problems are ideal for evaluating AI's cognitive reasoning due to their complexity and interdisciplinary nature, which are essential for tackling complex scientific challenges and facilitating discoveries. Beyond evaluating performance across various disciplines using answer-only criteria, we conduct detailed experiments and analyses from multiple perspectives. We delve into the models' cognitive reasoning abilities, their performance across different modalities, and their outcomes in process-level evaluations, which are vital for tasks requiring complex reasoning with lengthy solutions. Our extensive evaluations reveal that even advanced models like GPT-4o only achieve a 39.97% overall accuracy, illustrating current AI limitations in complex reasoning and multimodal integration. Through the OlympicArena, we aim to advance AI towards superintelligence, equipping it to address more complex challenges in science and beyond. We also provide a comprehensive set of resources to support AI research, including a benchmark dataset, an open-source annotation platform, a detailed evaluation tool, and a leaderboard with automatic submission features.

6/19/2024

OlympiadBench: A Challenging Benchmark for Promoting AGI with Olympiad-Level Bilingual Multimodal Scientific Problems

Chaoqun He, Renjie Luo, Yuzhuo Bai, Shengding Hu, Zhen Leng Thai, Junhao Shen, Jinyi Hu, Xu Han, Yujie Huang, Yuxiang Zhang, Jie Liu, Lei Qi, Zhiyuan Liu, Maosong Sun

Recent advancements have seen Large Language Models (LLMs) and Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) surpassing general human capabilities in various tasks, approaching the proficiency level of human experts across multiple domains. With traditional benchmarks becoming less challenging for these models, new rigorous challenges are essential to gauge their advanced abilities. In this work, we present OlympiadBench, an Olympiad-level bilingual multimodal scientific benchmark, featuring 8,476 problems from Olympiad-level mathematics and physics competitions, including the Chinese college entrance exam. Each problem is detailed with expert-level annotations for step-by-step reasoning. Evaluating top-tier models on OlympiadBench, we implement a comprehensive assessment methodology to accurately evaluate model responses. Notably, the best-performing model, GPT-4V, attains an average score of 17.97% on OlympiadBench, with a mere 10.74% in physics, highlighting the benchmark rigor and the intricacy of physical reasoning. Our analysis orienting GPT-4V points out prevalent issues with hallucinations, knowledge omissions, and logical fallacies. We hope that our challenging benchmark can serve as a valuable resource for helping future AGI research endeavors. The data and evaluation code are available at url{https://github.com/OpenBMB/OlympiadBench}

6/7/2024

🤖

OlympicArena Medal Ranks: Who Is the Most Intelligent AI So Far?

Zhen Huang, Zengzhi Wang, Shijie Xia, Pengfei Liu

In this report, we pose the following question: Who is the most intelligent AI model to date, as measured by the OlympicArena (an Olympic-level, multi-discipline, multi-modal benchmark for superintelligent AI)? We specifically focus on the most recently released models: Claude-3.5-Sonnet, Gemini-1.5-Pro, and GPT-4o. For the first time, we propose using an Olympic medal Table approach to rank AI models based on their comprehensive performance across various disciplines. Empirical results reveal: (1) Claude-3.5-Sonnet shows highly competitive overall performance over GPT-4o, even surpassing GPT-4o on a few subjects (i.e., Physics, Chemistry, and Biology). (2) Gemini-1.5-Pro and GPT-4V are ranked consecutively just behind GPT-4o and Claude-3.5-Sonnet, but with a clear performance gap between them. (3) The performance of AI models from the open-source community significantly lags behind these proprietary models. (4) The performance of these models on this benchmark has been less than satisfactory, indicating that we still have a long way to go before achieving superintelligence. We remain committed to continuously tracking and evaluating the performance of the latest powerful models on this benchmark (available at https://github.com/GAIR-NLP/OlympicArena).

6/27/2024

GameBench: Evaluating Strategic Reasoning Abilities of LLM Agents

Anthony Costarelli, Mat Allen, Roman Hauksson, Grace Sodunke, Suhas Hariharan, Carlson Cheng, Wenjie Li, Joshua Clymer, Arjun Yadav

Large language models have demonstrated remarkable few-shot performance on many natural language understanding tasks. Despite several demonstrations of using large language models in complex, strategic scenarios, there lacks a comprehensive framework for evaluating agents' performance across various types of reasoning found in games. To address this gap, we introduce GameBench, a cross-domain benchmark for evaluating strategic reasoning abilities of LLM agents. We focus on 9 different game environments, where each covers at least one axis of key reasoning skill identified in strategy games, and select games for which strategy explanations are unlikely to form a significant portion of models' pretraining corpuses. Our evaluations use GPT-3 and GPT-4 in their base form along with two scaffolding frameworks designed to enhance strategic reasoning ability: Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting and Reasoning Via Planning (RAP). Our results show that none of the tested models match human performance, and at worst GPT-4 performs worse than random action. CoT and RAP both improve scores but not comparable to human levels.

7/23/2024