On The Expressive Power of Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods

Read original: arXiv:2407.16326 - Published 7/29/2024 by Jiexing Gao, Dmitry Rodin, Vasily Motolygin, Denis Zaytsev
Total Score

0

On The Expressive Power of Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper examines the expressive power of knowledge graph embedding methods.
  • Knowledge graph embedding is a technique used to represent entities and relationships in a knowledge graph as dense, low-dimensional vectors.
  • The authors investigate the capability of various embedding methods to capture different types of relationships and logical constraints in the knowledge graph.

Plain English Explanation

Knowledge graphs are digital representations of real-world information, with entities (like people, places, or things) connected by different types of relationships (like "located in," "works for," or "is a part of"). Knowledge graph embedding is a way to convert this complex graph structure into simpler numerical vectors that can be more easily processed by machine learning algorithms.

The researchers in this paper wanted to understand how well different embedding methods can capture the nuanced relationships and logical rules present in knowledge graphs. They examined the capabilities of various embedding techniques to represent things like hierarchies, symmetries, and other structural properties of the data.

By analyzing the expressiveness of these embedding methods, the authors aimed to provide guidance on which techniques might be most suitable for different knowledge graph applications and tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper evaluates the expressive power of several prominent knowledge graph embedding methods, including TransE, RotatE, and ComplEx. The authors investigate the ability of these models to capture various types of relationships, such as subsumption (hierarchical), symmetry, inversion, and composition.

The researchers formulate a set of logical constraints that represent these different relationship patterns. They then analyze the theoretical capability of each embedding method to satisfy these constraints by deriving the necessary and sufficient conditions for the model parameters.

Through this analysis, the paper shows that more expressive embedding models, like RotatE and ComplEx, have greater flexibility in representing a wider range of logical structures within the knowledge graph. In contrast, simpler models like TransE are more limited in the types of relationships they can effectively capture.

The technical insights from this work can help practitioners choose the most appropriate embedding method for their specific knowledge graph application and requirements.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a valuable theoretical analysis of the expressive power of knowledge graph embedding techniques. By focusing on the ability of these models to satisfy logical constraints, the authors offer a rigorous framework for evaluating and comparing the capabilities of different embedding methods.

One potential limitation of the research is that the analysis is primarily theoretical and does not extensively validate the findings through empirical experiments. While the authors do provide some illustrative examples, a more comprehensive evaluation on real-world knowledge graphs could further strengthen the conclusions.

Additionally, the paper does not consider the potential trade-offs between expressive power and other desirable properties, such as computational efficiency or generalization ability. In practice, the choice of embedding method may involve balancing multiple factors beyond just the representational capacity.

Further research could explore the practical implications of the expressive power analysis, such as investigating the relationship between a model's theoretical constraints and its performance on downstream tasks like link prediction or entity classification.

Conclusion

This paper offers a detailed examination of the expressive power of knowledge graph embedding methods, shedding light on their ability to capture various types of logical relationships and constraints present in knowledge graphs.

The insights from this work can guide practitioners in selecting the most appropriate embedding technique for their specific application requirements, informed by the model's theoretical capabilities and limitations. By understanding the representational power of these embedding methods, researchers and developers can make more informed decisions when designing knowledge graph-based systems.

The findings also suggest potential avenues for future research, such as exploring the practical implications of expressive power in real-world scenarios and investigating the trade-offs between representational capacity and other desirable model properties.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

On The Expressive Power of Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods
Total Score

0

On The Expressive Power of Knowledge Graph Embedding Methods

Jiexing Gao, Dmitry Rodin, Vasily Motolygin, Denis Zaytsev

Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) is a popular approach, which aims to represent entities and relations of a knowledge graph in latent spaces. Their representations are known as embeddings. To measure the plausibility of triplets, score functions are defined over embedding spaces. Despite wide dissemination of KGE in various tasks, KGE methods have limitations in reasoning abilities. In this paper we propose a mathematical framework to compare reasoning abilities of KGE methods. We show that STransE has a higher capability than TransComplEx, and then present new STransCoRe method, which improves the STransE by combining it with the TransCoRe insights, which can reduce the STransE space complexity.

Read more

7/29/2024

Croppable Knowledge Graph Embedding
Total Score

0

Croppable Knowledge Graph Embedding

Yushan Zhu, Wen Zhang, Zhiqiang Liu, Mingyang Chen, Lei Liang, Huajun Chen

Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE) is a common method for Knowledge Graphs (KGs) to serve various artificial intelligence tasks. The suitable dimensions of the embeddings depend on the storage and computing conditions of the specific application scenarios. Once a new dimension is required, a new KGE model needs to be trained from scratch, which greatly increases the training cost and limits the efficiency and flexibility of KGE in serving various scenarios. In this work, we propose a novel KGE training framework MED, through which we could train once to get a croppable KGE model applicable to multiple scenarios with different dimensional requirements, sub-models of the required dimensions can be cropped out of it and used directly without any additional training. In MED, we propose a mutual learning mechanism to improve the low-dimensional sub-models performance and make the high-dimensional sub-models retain the capacity that low-dimensional sub-models have, an evolutionary improvement mechanism to promote the high-dimensional sub-models to master the knowledge that the low-dimensional sub-models can not learn, and a dynamic loss weight to balance the multiple losses adaptively. Experiments on 3 KGE models over 4 standard KG completion datasets, 3 real application scenarios over a real-world large-scale KG, and the experiments of extending MED to the language model BERT show the effectiveness, high efficiency, and flexible extensibility of MED.

Read more

7/4/2024

CL4KGE: A Curriculum Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Embedding
Total Score

0

CL4KGE: A Curriculum Learning Method for Knowledge Graph Embedding

Yang Liu, Chuan Zhou, Peng Zhang, Yanan Cao, Yongchao Liu, Zhao Li, Hongyang Chen

Knowledge graph embedding (KGE) constitutes a foundational task, directed towards learning representations for entities and relations within knowledge graphs (KGs), with the objective of crafting representations comprehensive enough to approximate the logical and symbolic interconnections among entities. In this paper, we define a metric Z-counts to measure the difficulty of training each triple ($$) in KGs with theoretical analysis. Based on this metric, we propose textbf{CL4KGE}, an efficient textbf{C}urriculum textbf{L}earning based training strategy for textbf{KGE}. This method includes a difficulty measurer and a training scheduler that aids in the training of KGE models. Our approach possesses the flexibility to act as a plugin within a wide range of KGE models, with the added advantage of adaptability to the majority of KGs in existence. The proposed method has been evaluated on popular KGE models, and the results demonstrate that it enhances the state-of-the-art methods. The use of Z-counts as a metric has enabled the identification of challenging triples in KGs, which helps in devising effective training strategies.

Read more

9/10/2024

Sharing Parameter by Conjugation for Knowledge Graph Embeddings in Complex Space
Total Score

0

Sharing Parameter by Conjugation for Knowledge Graph Embeddings in Complex Space

Xincan Feng, Zhi Qu, Yuchang Cheng, Taro Watanabe, Nobuhiro Yugami

A Knowledge Graph (KG) is the directed graphical representation of entities and relations in the real world. KG can be applied in diverse Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks where knowledge is required. The need to scale up and complete KG automatically yields Knowledge Graph Embedding (KGE), a shallow machine learning model that is suffering from memory and training time consumption issues. To mitigate the computational load, we propose a parameter-sharing method, i.e., using conjugate parameters for complex numbers employed in KGE models. Our method improves memory efficiency by 2x in relation embedding while achieving comparable performance to the state-of-the-art non-conjugate models, with faster, or at least comparable, training time. We demonstrated the generalizability of our method on two best-performing KGE models $5^{bigstar}mathrm{E}$ and $mathrm{ComplEx}$ on five benchmark datasets.

Read more

4/19/2024